Skip to content
You can now search across every topic, entity and event.What's new
European Oil Markets
31JUL

The squeeze is the LNG the ban misses

2 min read
09:33UTC

JKM printed USD 18.86/MMBtu on 12 June, more than doubling the arb against TTF to roughly USD 5.26/MMBtu and pulling Atlantic LNG cargoes east to Asia, away from Europe in injection season.

EconomicAssessed

The JKM-TTF arbitrage more than doubled, with JKM printing USD 18.86/MMBtu on Friday 12 June against a TTF equivalent near USD 13.6, up from a far narrower gap on 11 June 1. JKM, the Japan Korea Marker, is the Northeast Asian spot-LNG benchmark; the arb is the gap that decides whether a flexible Atlantic cargo sails east or west. The implied spread works out to roughly USD 5.26/MMBtu, a figure that should be read as approximate, because it converts the EUR-denominated TTF print into USD/MMBtu across a few-day date offset; the sourced anchor is JKM at USD 18.86 and the direction of the pull.

The arb had compressed to USD 1.225 in the week to 1 June before diverging from the flat prompt . At that compressed level a cargo sat near the round-trip threshold between basins. At roughly USD 5.26 the economics firmly favour Asia, and a flexible US or Atlantic Basin cargo routes east rather than discharging into Europe.

The direction is the opposite of what Europe needs in injection season, when terminals want every spare cargo. This is the genuine supply tightening in the briefing, and the 17 June ban does nothing about it, because the regulation covers pipeline gas, not seaborne LNG. The one force actually pulling molecules away from Europe sits entirely outside the measure's scope, which is why the prompt can fall through its floor in the same week a real tightening is underway.

Deep Analysis

In plain English

JKM is the Japanese-Korean Marker, the price tag on a cargo of liquefied natural gas (LNG) delivered to Japan or South Korea. It is set daily by S&P Global Platts, the same company that prices oil markets. When JKM is higher than the equivalent European gas price (TTF), ship operators load their gas cargoes in the US Gulf, Africa, or the Atlantic and sail east to Asia rather than west to Europe. On 12 June 2026, JKM printed USD 18.86 per million British thermal units while the equivalent European price was around USD 13.6. That USD 5.26 gap is more than enough to cover the extra voyage cost to Asia. So flexible cargoes that could have gone to European storage terminals during the summer injection season headed east instead. This is the market working exactly as designed, but the effect for Europe is reduced supply at a time when storage is already well below target.

Deep Analysis
Root Causes

Japan and South Korea entered mid-June with lower-than-seasonal LNG inventories after a cooler-than-average May that delayed the normal spring demand reduction. Chinese independent power producers simultaneously increased LNG spot procurement from mid-May as domestic coal prices stayed elevated, competing with Japanese utilities for the same Atlantic Basin spot pool. The combination pushed JKM to USD 18.86/MMBtu on 12 June from a base of roughly USD 15-16 in early June.

The Hormuz supply disruption since February 2026 removed Qatari long-term contract flexibility from the Atlantic spot market: LNG that previously appeared as spot supply to European terminals during periods of Asian demand softness now moves on restricted long-term routes. That structural reduction in Atlantic swing supply means the JKM arb threshold that pulls cargoes east is now lower, because the European buffer of spot Qatari supply that would have competed with Asian demand is absent.

What could happen next?
  • Risk

    JKM-TTF at USD 5.26/MMBtu on 12 June pulls every uncommitted Atlantic LNG cargo east for the remainder of the summer loading cycle, reducing spot LNG availability for European storage injection by an estimated 5-8 cargoes per month.

  • Consequence

    The arb widening compounds the EU storage deficit: Europe needs LNG most when the arb is highest and JKM incentivises eastward diversion, creating a structural supply-demand misalignment during the critical June-August injection window.

First Reported In

Update #18 · TTF breaks the floor into the import ban

Bloomberg· 15 Jun 2026
Read original
Causes and effects
This Event
The squeeze is the LNG the ban misses
The widening arb is the one genuine supply tightening in the window, and it is the LNG the pipeline ban does not cover.
Different Perspectives
Sanctions compliance officer reviewing a Lukoil International GmbH bid
Sanctions compliance officer reviewing a Lukoil International GmbH bid
OFAC's amended FAQ 1224 gives a compliance desk its first published standard: full severance from Lukoil and a US-jurisdiction blocked account for sale proceeds. The conditions name neither ISAB nor Italy, so a Priolo Gargallo-linked bid answers a different question than a Neftochim Burgas or Petrotel Ploiesti one.
Managed-money funds on Brent Last Day
Managed-money funds on Brent Last Day
CFTC data for the week to 21 July showed managed money flipping 74,400 contracts to a net long of 15,665 against 1,410 short on the Brent Last Day contract, code 06765T. A fund that held that short through July has now covered it, and the spent short base raises the bar for the next leg higher.
Saudi crude exporters
Saudi crude exporters
Saudi-linked tanker transits through Bab el-Mandeb fell to about 7.5 a day after the 24 July underwriting withdrawal, pushing more barrels onto the longer route round the Cape or through the Yanbu terminal. Every diverted barrel ties up a ship for longer, and a fleet that turns slower charges more.
Tanker owners on the Bab el-Mandeb route
Tanker owners on the Bab el-Mandeb route
Lloyd's-market syndicates withdrew war-risk cover from Saudi-linked hulls on 24 July, leaving owners of that class of vessel to sail Bab el-Mandeb uninsured or not at all. Tanker transits on the route fell to roughly 7.5 a day, and cover, once withdrawn, does not return on a shipowner's timetable.
Eni
Eni
Eni's board approved second-quarter results on 29 July, swinging refining EBIT to a EUR0.08bn profit from a year-earlier loss even as group profit doubled, and named Red Sea freight cost as a cap on that improvement. A refiner absorbing higher shipping costs on Saudi-linked crude while its numbers improve treats the freight line as a drag, not a crisis.
Asian buyers (India, Japan, China, South Korea)
Asian buyers (India, Japan, China, South Korea)
Asian refiners are absorbing 62% of Yanbu's 3.75m b/d flow, the bulk of Saudi Arabia's rerouted crude now clearing east rather than into the Atlantic basin. That destination split leaves Asian buyers more exposed to any single Yanbu-specific disruption than under the kingdom's normal multi-terminal export pattern.