Skip to content
You can now search across every topic, entity and event.What's new
European Oil Markets
31JUL

ACER says the Russian-gas ban has not bitten

2 min read
09:33UTC

ACER's first phase-out monitoring report, published 1 July, found Russian gas still met roughly 12% of EU demand, with LNG imports up 17% since the March ban and only Strandzha-1 flows falling.

EconomicDeveloping
Key takeaway

The EU regulator has dated the ban's non-bite: Russian gas held 12% of demand and imports rose.

ACER, the EU agency coordinating national energy regulators, published its first mandated Russian-gas phase-out monitoring report on 1 July and found Russian gas still supplied roughly 12% of EU demand. Since the short-term import ban took effect on 18 March, Russian LNG imports have risen 17% year-on-year across the 18 March to 31 May window, and pipeline imports are up 5%. One route bucked the trend: flows through Turkiye's Strandzha-1 entry point fell 65%.

Frontloading ahead of the deadline, contract adjustments and retained transhipment cargoes kept Russian LNG volumes climbing even as the ban bound, the reverse of what its headline implied. This desk read the 17 June pipeline step-down as legal paperwork rather than a physical supply event , because the routes carrying the volume ran exempt and the Central European hub's ban premium compressed back toward flat within a day .

For a spreads desk the read is that the March measure moved prices, not barrels. ACER has now dated and sized that gap: the 12% share is a quarterly scorecard rather than a cut, and the regulator states plainly that the harder impacts land later, not now. Traders position against the number itself, updated each July, rather than against a diffuse policy fear.

Deep Analysis

In plain English

The EU banned new short-term deals to buy Russian gas back in March, hoping it would squeeze Moscow's export earnings. Four months on, a new report from ACER, the EU's energy regulator, found Russian gas still supplies roughly one in eight units of gas Europe burns. The reason is simple: the ban only covers new, short-term purchases. Older, long-term contracts, some signed a decade ago and running until 2027, were deliberately left alone. So the headline numbers barely moved, not because the ban failed, but because it was never meant to touch this gas yet.

Deep Analysis
Root Causes

Regulation (EU) 2026/261 bans short-term and spot Russian gas contracts, not the long-term agreements signed before the law existed; TurkStream's pipeline volumes and several LNG term contracts were negotiated years ahead of the 18 March cutoff and run on take-or-pay terms that would trigger penalty payments if Brussels forced early termination.

That grandfather structure, not enforcement failure, is why the 12% share held steady: the ban was drafted to bite in November 2027, when the exempted contracts expire, and was never designed to move the needle before then.

What could happen next?
  • Meaning

    The exemption architecture leaves near-term Russian gas volumes structurally insulated from the ban until the underlying contracts expire.

First Reported In

Update #23 · The EU's own regulator says the ban isn't biting

ACER· 3 Jul 2026
Read original
Different Perspectives
Sanctions compliance officer reviewing a Lukoil International GmbH bid
Sanctions compliance officer reviewing a Lukoil International GmbH bid
OFAC's amended FAQ 1224 gives a compliance desk its first published standard: full severance from Lukoil and a US-jurisdiction blocked account for sale proceeds. The conditions name neither ISAB nor Italy, so a Priolo Gargallo-linked bid answers a different question than a Neftochim Burgas or Petrotel Ploiesti one.
Managed-money funds on Brent Last Day
Managed-money funds on Brent Last Day
CFTC data for the week to 21 July showed managed money flipping 74,400 contracts to a net long of 15,665 against 1,410 short on the Brent Last Day contract, code 06765T. A fund that held that short through July has now covered it, and the spent short base raises the bar for the next leg higher.
Saudi crude exporters
Saudi crude exporters
Saudi-linked tanker transits through Bab el-Mandeb fell to about 7.5 a day after the 24 July underwriting withdrawal, pushing more barrels onto the longer route round the Cape or through the Yanbu terminal. Every diverted barrel ties up a ship for longer, and a fleet that turns slower charges more.
Tanker owners on the Bab el-Mandeb route
Tanker owners on the Bab el-Mandeb route
Lloyd's-market syndicates withdrew war-risk cover from Saudi-linked hulls on 24 July, leaving owners of that class of vessel to sail Bab el-Mandeb uninsured or not at all. Tanker transits on the route fell to roughly 7.5 a day, and cover, once withdrawn, does not return on a shipowner's timetable.
Eni
Eni
Eni's board approved second-quarter results on 29 July, swinging refining EBIT to a EUR0.08bn profit from a year-earlier loss even as group profit doubled, and named Red Sea freight cost as a cap on that improvement. A refiner absorbing higher shipping costs on Saudi-linked crude while its numbers improve treats the freight line as a drag, not a crisis.
Asian buyers (India, Japan, China, South Korea)
Asian buyers (India, Japan, China, South Korea)
Asian refiners are absorbing 62% of Yanbu's 3.75m b/d flow, the bulk of Saudi Arabia's rerouted crude now clearing east rather than into the Atlantic basin. That destination split leaves Asian buyers more exposed to any single Yanbu-specific disruption than under the kingdom's normal multi-terminal export pattern.