Skip to content
Welcome, thoughtbot's Giant Robots listeners!Start here
Data Centres: Boom and Backlash
22OCT

OpenAI heads to market losing money

4 min read
16:40UTC

OpenAI confirmed its IPO filing on 9 June, targeting a September listing above $1 trillion. Reported figures show roughly $2bn a month in revenue against a projected $14bn operating loss for 2026, with no positive cash flow expected until about 2030.

IndustryDeveloping
Key takeaway

OpenAI is chasing a $1 trillion listing while losing close to 58 cents on every dollar of revenue it earns.

OpenAI filed a confidential draft prospectus with US regulators around 22 May and confirmed it publicly on 9 June, aiming for a public listing, an initial public offering, as early as September with Goldman Sachs, Morgan Stanley and JPMorgan underwriting⁠1. OpenAI is the San Francisco company behind ChatGPT and the primary demand driver for global AI infrastructure spending; an IPO would be the first time it opens its accounts to public investors.

The figures reported around the filing describe a company taking in roughly $2bn a month, about $24bn annualised, against a projected operating loss near $14bn for 2026, with no positive cash flow expected until about 2030. The public-listing target sits above $1 trillion, against an $852bn valuation set by a roughly $122bn fundraising round in March, with Amazon, Nvidia and SoftBank among the backers. These are reported figures attached to a confidential filing, not numbers drawn from a public prospectus, so each should be read as projected pending the S-1.

If the reported numbers hold, the arithmetic sets the terms. A $14bn loss against $24bn of revenue runs close to 58 cents lost for every dollar earned, which makes the shortfall the running cost of staying open rather than a one-off. A $1 trillion target prices the 2030 breakeven as near-certain, leaving thin margin if training costs climb or enterprise demand softens.

The loop closes on its own product. The same model whose jailbreak triggered the Anthropic suspension, GPT-5.5, remains on sale under OpenAI even as the lab chases a public listing at a loss-making run-rate. The engine behind much of the displacement this desk has tracked all year does not yet pay for itself, and OpenAI is asking the public to carry the gap until it might.

Deep Analysis

In plain English

OpenAI is the American company behind ChatGPT, the AI chatbot that became the fastest-growing consumer product in history. The company has told investors it wants to sell shares to the public in September 2026, at a total value above one trillion dollars. On reported figures, OpenAI takes in about two billion dollars a month in revenue but projects a loss of about fourteen billion dollars for 2026, roughly 58 cents lost for every dollar earned, with no positive cash flow expected until around 2030. An IPO above one trillion dollars asks ordinary investors to fund those four years of losses in exchange for a stake in a company that does not yet pay for itself. Amazon ran a similar loss-funded model from its 1999 IPO through its first profitable quarter in late 2001; the difference here is the scale, with OpenAI's projected 2026 loss running roughly 19 times Amazon's 1999 shortfall.

What could happen next?
  • Risk

    If the S-1 discloses a 2030 breakeven that requires revenue tripling and training-cost halving simultaneously, public-market scrutiny may trigger a WeWork-style re-pricing of the private AI market, affecting not only OpenAI but every AI company that took funding at 2025-26 valuations.

    Short term · Suggested
  • Consequence

    A successful OpenAI listing above $1 trillion would pressure Anthropic, Mistral, and other private frontier labs to file their own IPOs or take structurally similar growth-funded loss positions, sustaining the AI infrastructure spending that drives the displacement cycle.

    Medium term · Suggested
  • Opportunity

    Public-market scrutiny of OpenAI's S-1 will, for the first time, subject the displacement thesis, specifically whether AI-generated productivity gains justify the job-cut rate, to investor due diligence and analyst coverage across Goldman Sachs, Morgan Stanley, and JPMorgan research divisions.

    Short term · Assessed
  • Precedent

    Goldman Sachs and JPMorgan, which underwrite the OpenAI IPO, have simultaneously published the leading AI-displacement research and, in JPMorgan's case, confirmed internal AI displacement of staff. Their underwriting of a loss-funded AI company while documenting its displacement effects sets a precedent for institutional finance funding the transition.

    Long term · Assessed
First Reported In

Update #13 · Washington pulls a live AI model

Fortune· 13 Jun 2026
Read original →
Different Perspectives
Mohsen Rezaei
Mohsen Rezaei
The senior Iranian security official and former IRGC commander told Press TV that US-linked technology infrastructure in the region could become a target if war resumes. He named the UAE and valued the assets at more than US$2 trillion, without a breakdown.
Mykhailo Shelemba
Mykhailo Shelemba
Datagroup's chief executive says the Kyiv data centre hit on the night of 18 to 19 October is beyond repair. Services continue from backup sites, and no staff were hurt.
Kristen Umstattd
Kristen Umstattd
The Loudoun supervisor voted against fast-tracking Amazon's rezoning of the Ashburn campus. She said there were no figures yet on homes, school or road costs.
Akishima residents' litigation group
Akishima residents' litigation group
The group formed on 18 October and plans to sue Nihon GLP by year-end to stop eight data-centre buildings. Its lawyers will argue rights to life, health, clean water and a natural environment after mediation failed in August.
Óscar López
Óscar López
Spain's Digital Transformation minister said on 22 October he could not confirm when the data-centre decree will be approved. He added that Google has always committed to investing in Spain.
Google
Google
Google said it would comply with LVV's order to stop preparatory works at Muhos and Kajaani until environmental assessments finish. A spokesperson conceded the company had fallen short.

Written with AI from Lowdown's published reporting. Not individually reviewed by an editor. Editorial standards.