Skip to content
You can now search across every topic, entity and event.What's new
GPT-5.5
ProductUS

GPT-5.5

OpenAI model; matched Mythos on the 32-step attack benchmark; cited by Anthropic in June 2026 export-control dispute.

Last refreshed: 13 June 2026 · Appears in 2 active topics

Key Question

Is GPT-5.5 the second AI that can carry out a full corporate cyberattack without human help?

Timeline for GPT-5.5

#1312 Jun
#96 May

Cleared AISI's 32-step autonomous attack chain benchmark, becoming second model to do so

AI: Jobs, Power & Money: GPT-5.5 clears 32-step attack chain; two models in five days
View full timeline →
Common Questions
What is GPT-5.5 and what did it achieve on the AISI benchmark?
GPT-5.5 is an OpenAI model that scored 71.4% on AISI expert-level cybersecurity tasks and became the second model to complete AISI's 32-step 'The Last Ones' autonomous enterprise network attack benchmark on 1 May 2026.Source: UK AI Security Institute evaluation, 1 May 2026
What is the AISI 32-step 'The Last Ones' benchmark?
It is a UK AI Security Institute test that simulates autonomous traversal of a corporate network from initial access to data exfiltration across 32 steps. AISI estimates a full pass represents roughly 20 hours of trained-human autonomous work.Source: UK AI Security Institute
Which AI models have passed the AISI autonomous cyberattack benchmark?
Two models have completed the 32-step 'The Last Ones' benchmark: Anthropic's Claude Mythos Preview (first) and OpenAI's GPT-5.5 (second, evaluated 1 May 2026).Source: UK AI Security Institute evaluation, May 2026

Background

GPT-5.5 is an AI model released by OpenAI. On 1 May 2026, the UK AI Security Institute (AISI) published an evaluation in which GPT-5.5 scored 71.4% on expert-level capture-the-flag cybersecurity tasks, with 73% on the Mythos benchmark, and became only the second model to complete AISI's 32-step "The Last Ones" enterprise network attack range end-to-end. The first model to pass this benchmark was Anthropic's Claude Mythos Preview.

The 32-step benchmark simulates autonomous traversal of a corporate network, from initial access through lateral movement to data exfiltration. AISI estimated the capability demonstrated is equivalent to approximately 20 hours of trained-human work performed autonomously. The benchmark's completion by a second model signals that advanced autonomous cyberattack capability is no longer exclusive to one frontier AI laboratory.

On 12 June 2026, GPT-5.5's presence in the market became directly relevant to the first US government suspension of a commercial AI product. When Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick issued a directive forcing Anthropic to disable Claude Fable 5 and Claude Mythos 5 over a claimed jailbreak, Anthropic publicly cited GPT-5.5 as evidence that the capability is widely available: the same jailbreak vector was assessed to be present in GPT-5.5, which remained on sale and was not subject to any equivalent directive. The discrepancy raised immediate questions about the consistency of the export-control framework and whether Anthropic was being treated differently from its primary commercial rival.

More questions
Why does GPT-5.5 passing an attack benchmark matter for AI safety?
It marks the point at which advanced autonomous cyberattack capability is no longer exclusive to one frontier lab. Two commercially-linked models can now execute complex, multi-stage network attacks without human guidance, raising pressure for regulatory deployment thresholds.Source: AISI evaluation commentary, May 2026
Why was GPT-5.5 not banned when Anthropic models were?
When the US barred foreign nationals from Claude Fable 5 and Mythos 5 in June 2026, Anthropic argued that GPT-5.5 carries the same jailbreak vector and remained on sale. No equivalent directive was issued against OpenAI, raising questions about selective enforcement.Source: event