Skip to content
Welcome, thoughtbot's Giant Robots listeners!Start here
AI: Jobs, Power & Money
6NOV

US cloud giants double capex in Q3

3 min read
11:10UTC

Amazon, Alphabet and Microsoft each roughly doubled quarterly spending on data centres and chips; Amazon and Alphabet added staff, while Microsoft gave no headcount.

EconomicAssessed
Key takeaway

Three hyperscalers doubled capex in one quarter while their headcounts moved in different directions.

Amazon, Alphabet and Microsoft each roughly doubled their capital expenditure (capex: spending on data centres, chips and buildings) in the three months to September, in results published on 28 and 29 October, and only two of them reported more staff. Amazon spent $77.3bn on property and equipment against $35.1bn a year earlier, and its workforce rose by 43,000 in the quarter to 1,638,000⁠1. Alphabet spent $51.4bn against $24.0bn and ended September with 204,757 staff, 5,824 more than in June⁠2.

Microsoft's additions to property and equipment rose to $39.4bn from $19.4bn on revenue of $92.3bn, and its 28 October results gave no headcount⁠3. Press reports say it offered voluntary exit packages (severance paid to staff who agree to leave) to about 60,000 staff from 26 October, about 27% of the 223,000 it employed in June, with staff to decide in early December⁠4. Microsoft has filed nothing and has not confirmed the figure.

Meta, which reported on 21 October, cut headcount 15% on the year to 66,775 while spending $34.9bn⁠5. Together the four spent about $203bn in one quarter, more than twice Microsoft's revenue for the same three months. Per employee, Meta spent about $523,000, Alphabet $251,000 and Amazon $47,000. The split the four showed in the summer holds, and Alphabet's gain extends the growth it reported in July.

Amazon's 43,000 are mostly warehouse and delivery workers, so its count says little about office jobs. A large share of the $203bn pays for cloud capacity the companies rent to other firms, so the sum tracks the scale of the AI boom more than any one company's wish to replace its own staff. Meta had the highest spend per head of the four and was the only one to report fewer staff. Meta gave no AI reason for the cut.

Deep Analysis

In plain English

Amazon, Google's parent Alphabet, and Microsoft run the giant data centres that power AI services. Each reports every three months how much it spends and how many people it employs. In the quarter to September, all three roughly doubled their spending on buildings and equipment compared with a year earlier. Amazon and Alphabet hired more people. Microsoft did not say how many people it employs, and news reports say it offered tens of thousands of staff money to leave voluntarily. So heavy spending on AI does not mean the same thing for jobs at every company.

Deep Analysis
Root Causes

Hyperscalers sell computing capacity to other companies, so their capex follows customer demand for AI services more than their own wish to automate. A firm can double spending on servers while its own staff count rises.

Payroll pressure comes from the cash cost of that spending. Servers and buildings must be paid for up front, and salaries are the largest cost a firm can cut quickly without slowing construction.

The firms report headcount differently. Amazon's figure is dominated by warehouse and delivery staff, and Microsoft did not publish one this quarter, so the four counts do not measure the same kind of work.

What could happen next?
  • Meaning

    Doubling capex has not produced a single direction in headcount across the largest AI spenders.

    Immediate · Assessed
  • Risk

    If press reports are right, Microsoft's offer reaches about a quarter of its June workforce, far more staff than the 8,750 eligible for its April retirement programme.

    Short term · Suggested
  • Consequence

    Layoff tallies that count only announced cuts will miss staff reductions made through voluntary exits.

    Short term · Assessed
First Reported In

Update #22 · Central banks see AI before payrolls do

Amazon.com / SEC EDGAR· 6 Nov 2026
Read original →
Different Perspectives
Korea's four largest banks, as reported by News1
Korea's four largest banks, as reported by News1
KB Kookmin, Shinhan, Hana and Woori rehired 1,013 retirees last year, equal to 79.1% of their graduate intake, according to News1. Graduates face a smaller entry intake while returners take fixed-term credit-screening roles at lower pay, News1 reports.
High Court of Justice of Madrid
High Court of Justice of Madrid
The court's employment chamber ruled in judgment 864/2026, dated 8 October and made public in early November, that introducing AI is not on its own a ground for dismissal. Employers must prove AI's effect through the four causes the Workers' Statute already lists.
Singapore Ministry of Manpower
Singapore Ministry of Manpower
The Singapore Ministry of Manpower put third-quarter retrenchments at 4,800, concentrated in information and communications, financial services and manufacturing, with business reorganisation the main driver. Its release does not mention AI.
Challenger, Gray & Christmas
Challenger, Gray & Christmas
Challenger reported on 5 November that market and economic conditions overtook AI as the leading stated reason for 2026's US job cuts, at 130,531 against 121,401. AI was cited for 1,265 cuts in October, its lowest month of the year.
Office for Budget Responsibility
Office for Budget Responsibility
The OBR's 28 October outlook showed output per worker in information and communication growing 7.6% a year, yet kept AI's boost to UK productivity at 0.2 percentage points a year. It does not attribute the faster growth to AI.
Central Bank of Ireland
Central Bank of Ireland
Governor Gabriel Makhlouf said on 2 November that AI investment has supported Irish activity and flagged the debt financing behind it as a financial-stability risk. On jobs, he named skills bottlenecks and mismatches, not job losses.

Written with AI from Lowdown's published reporting. Not individually reviewed by an editor. Editorial standards.