Skip to content
You can now search across every topic, entity and event.What's new
2026 FIFA World Cup
25JUL

Iran coaches from across the border

3 min read
11:57UTC

Iran's 26-man squad landed in Tijuana at 5am on 8 June and will cross into the US only on match days, with 14 staff still locked out.

SportDeveloping
Key takeaway

Iran runs its World Cup from a Mexican base camp after the host barred its federation chief.

Iran's full 26-man squad landed in Tijuana at about 5am on Monday 8 June after an overnight flight from Antalya, and will cross into the United States only on match days . The squad is now based in Mexico, a co-host, while fourteen support staff remain denied US entry, among them FFIRI (Football Federation of the Islamic Republic of Iran) secretary-general Hedayat Mombeini and vice-president Mehdi Mohammad Nabi 1. Federation president Mehdi Taj, identified in Iranian and Canadian reporting as a former commander of the IRGC (Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps), has been refused entry to North America twice since April.

The arrangement is the end-state of a standoff that built through the spring. Iran flew out of Antalya without US visas for its staff after a self-set deadline passed , and an earlier landing in Tijuana already counted denied officials before this confirmed base-camp operation . The number of cleared staff has not risen since. Iranian outlets frame the blocks as the host obstructing the team; FIFA again points to host-government discretion over entry.

Gianni Infantino, FIFA president, has said "there is no Plan B, because there is no replacement squad" 2, language that closes off any contingency and commits FIFA to Iran's participation as it stands. The practical result two days out is a federation managing its World Cup from a Mexican border city, coordinating with Tehran, and crossing a frontier each time it has a match to play. FIFA recognises federations and host governments as its counterparties, which routes the entry dispute away from Zurich by design.

Deep Analysis

In plain English

Iran qualified for the 2026 World Cup but faces a complication: the US government has refused to allow several of its football federation's staff to enter the country. The players themselves got US visas, but 14 support staff, including the federation's secretary-general and vice-president, were denied. FFIRI president Mehdi Taj, who is identified in media reports as a former commander of Iran's Revolutionary Guard (the IRGC, a powerful military force the US designates as a terrorist organisation), has been blocked from entering North America twice since April. To manage this, Iran's players flew to Tijuana, a Mexican city right on the US border south of San Diego. They live and train in Mexico, then cross into the United States only on the days they play their group matches, returning to Tijuana immediately after. FIFA's president Infantino said there is no backup plan: if Iran cannot participate under these conditions, there is no replacement squad. No other World Cup team is operating this way.

Deep Analysis
Root Causes

The core structural constraint is the US Treasury and State Department's IRGC-designation framework. After the US designated the IRGC a Foreign Terrorist Organisation in 2019, any individual with documented prior IRGC service faces an automatic hold in the non-immigrant visa and admissibility systems.

Mehdi Taj's reported former IRGC commander role puts him in the hardest category for any administrative waiver; Secretary of State Marco Rubio stated publicly that players are welcome but IRGC-linked personnel will not be admitted.

FIFA's force-majeure and host-agreement architecture creates the second constraint. Article 6 of the 2026 World Cup Regulations gives FIFA sole discretion over withdrawal consequences, but FFIRI has not invoked the exit clause. A federation that has not formally triggered force majeure is, in FIFA's reading, a federation that has chosen to play. That reading locks Iran into participation under degraded conditions with no contractual leverage to demand that FIFA compel the US to admit its staff.

The Tijuana arrangement reflects a third structural factor: Mexico's co-host status. Because the tournament's infrastructure spans three countries, Iran can base itself on Mexican soil where its full delegation has access, crossing only for matches. Without that co-host arrangement, Iran would face a starker choice between participation with all staff blocked or withdrawal.

What could happen next?
  • Consequence

    Iran's players will have no access to their full technical staff, including the federation secretary-general, during any training day of the tournament, reducing coaching coordination between Tijuana sessions and match-day execution.

    Immediate · Assessed
  • Risk

    If a player requires medical or administrative attention by a staff member denied US entry during a match, Iran's on-field delegation may lack personnel authorised to act on behalf of the federation.

    Immediate · Reported
  • Precedent

    The Tijuana split-camp model establishes that a World Cup participant can operate from a co-host nation's territory while competing entirely in a third nation, a template relevant for future multi-nation tournaments.

    Long term · Assessed
First Reported In

Update #17 · Host turns back a World Cup referee

The National· 9 Jun 2026
Read original
Different Perspectives
Real Madrid
Real Madrid
Operating internally on the basis Rodri joins, according to David Ornstein's reporting, despite no talks having taken place with Manchester City. The gap between internal planning and actual negotiation is itself notable.
Manchester City
Manchester City
Unwilling to sell Rodri, with manager Enzo Maresca stating he returns to the club after back surgery. No club-to-club talks with Real Madrid are taking place, contradicting the framing of a deal in motion.
CONMEBOL
CONMEBOL
Backs the move to a 64-team 2030 tournament co-hosted across South America. Has not engaged publicly with FIFPRO's workload or heat-threshold objections drawn from this tournament's data.
FIFA
FIFA
Points to its 30 June technical and officiating reviews as the authoritative account of the tournament's football, including Collina's rejection of bias claims. Has not publicly responded to the renewed compensation call or disputed FIFPRO's heat-threshold figures.
FIFPRO
FIFPRO
Measures a four-degree gap between its own 28C postponement threshold and FIFA's 32C cooling-break trigger, breached in 19% of matches played. Cites a 70-83 match workload projection to oppose the 64-team 2030 format.
Human Rights Watch
Human Rights Watch
Documents 54 immigration-custody deaths before kickoff and two since, and revives the compensation duty FIFA's own advisers identified after Qatar 2022 and never acted on. Treats the pattern as unresolved FIFA liability, not a closed file.