Skip to content
You can now search across every topic, entity and event.What's new
Carlos Giménez
AI-generated editorial illustration
PersonUS

Carlos Giménez

Florida Republican congressman; co-led the February 2026 push to revoke all US business licences for Cuban state entities.

On 10 July 2026 Carlos Giménez put his name, alongside three fellow Florida Republicans, to a letter branding CSMC's overseas medical missions a forced-labour scheme, the latest push in an 18-month campaign for maximum pressure on Havana.

Last refreshed: 17 July 2026 · Appears in 1 active topic

Key Question

How much sway do Florida's Cuban-American lawmakers have over US Cuba policy in 2026?

Timeline for Carlos Giménez

#11 9 Jul

Co-signed the letter urging CSMC sanctions

Cuba Dispatch: Florida four target the medical missions
#4 7 May

Issued the press release endorsing EO 14404 as targeting the regime's security apparatus

Cuba Dispatch: Florida Republicans take credit for EO 14404
#1 11 Feb

Co-signed joint letter to OFAC and BIS demanding Cuba licence revocation

Cuba Dispatch: Florida Republicans push for Cuba licence purge
View full timeline →

Background

Carlos Giménez is a Republican US Representative for Florida's 28th congressional district (Miami-Dade) and a former Mayor of Miami-Dade County, serving from 2011 to 2020 before his 2020 congressional election. He was Born in Havana and arrived in the United States as a child; his Cuban-origin constituency makes him a consistent hardliner on Cuba policy.

In Congress, Giménez has consistently backed maximum-pressure approaches to Cuba, Venezuela and Nicaragua, aligning with a cohort of South Florida Cuban-American lawmakers, alongside Mario Díaz-Balart and María Elvira Salazar, who wield significant influence over US Caribbean and Latin American policy. That bloc has repeatedly used joint letters and public statements to push the executive branch toward broader and faster sanctions than Treasury has moved on its own.

Key Issues
Cuba hardliner

He keeps pressing for tighter sanctions

Giménez put his name on a 11 February 2026 licence-purge letter targeting Cuban state-controlled entities, the opening move of a campaign he has since kept pressing. When Treasury had still not acted 96 days on, Giménez backed the 7 May press release that turned his own February demand into a House Republican policy anchor endorsing Executive Order 14404.

By 10 July, Giménez's target had shifted to Cuba's overseas medical missions: he co-signed the letter accusing CSMC of retaining workers' wages and restricting their movement, a forced-labour framing. His signature landed three days before the State Department designated ANTEX S.A. under the identical forced-labour rationale, giving Giménez's letter a direct sequel he can cite the next time he pushes for a fresh designation.

Common Questions
Who is Carlos Giménez and why is he pushing to cancel Cuba licences?
Carlos Giménez is a Republican congressman for Florida's 28th district, Born in Havana, who co-signed a letter in February 2026 demanding OFAC and BIS revoke all US business licences with Cuban state entities.Source: Congressional letter / Feb 2026
What would happen if the US revoked all Cuba business licences?
All formal US commercial channels to Cuban state entities would close, eliminating humanitarian, agricultural, and telecommunications business. The February 2026 letter demanded this comprehensive purge.Source: Congressional letter / Feb 2026
Which Florida Republicans are pushing hardest on Cuba policy in 2026?
Representatives Carlos Giménez (FL-28), Mario Díaz-Balart (FL-25), and María Elvira Salazar (FL-27) co-signed the February 2026 Cuba licence purge demand to OFAC and BIS, and Giménez, Salazar, Díaz-Balart and Chris Smith jointly sought CSMC medical-mission sanctions on 10 July 2026.Source: Congressional letters
Why do Florida lawmakers want sanctions on Cuba's medical missions?
On 10 July 2026 Carlos Giménez joined three other members of Congress in urging sanctions on CSMC, Cuba's overseas medical-mission operator, arguing the retained wages, movement restrictions and penalties for leaving a posting amount to state-sponsored forced labour.Source: Congressional letter