11NOV

Two Dan Sullivans, one Alaska toss-up

1 min read

18:10UTC

Alaska's Supreme Court put a second Dan Sullivan back on the Senate primary ballot on 29 June, and Cook moved the race to Toss-up two days later.

← Back to Late ballots flip North Carolina's 3rd Jump to analysis ↓

PoliticsDeveloping

Key takeaway

A second Dan Sullivan on the ballot turned a safe Republican seat into a toss-up.

The Alaska Supreme Court reinstated Dan J. Sullivan of Petersburg to the 18 August Senate primary ballot on 29 June, overturning the state Division of Elections' disqualification of him for a bad-faith filing. the Court found the good-faith test the elections director had applied appears nowhere in Alaska's constitution, statute or regulation. Dan J. Sullivan shares no family tie with Senator Dan S. Sullivan.

He now runs against Republican Senator Dan S. Sullivan and Democratic recruit Mary Peltola under Alaska's top-four ranked-choice system, in which the four leading primary candidates advance and voters rank them in the general election. Two identically named Republicans on one ballot let a voter who means the senator rank the challenger first by mistake. Under ranked-choice counting, those stray first preferences can tip a close multi-round tally.

Cook Political Report moved Alaska Senate from Lean Republican to Toss-up on 1 July, citing that siphon risk directly. A seat the party had banked on holding now turns on ballot design rather than on any shift in what voters want. Alaska's Division of Elections has not said how it will distinguish the two names in August.

Deep Analysis

In plain English

Alaska's Supreme Court put a second candidate named Dan Sullivan back on the primary ballot, running against the sitting Republican senator, who is also named Dan Sullivan. Election officials had tried to keep the newcomer off the ballot over fears voters would be confused about which one they were voting for. Alaska uses ranked-choice voting, where voters rank candidates in order of preference, but that system was not built to solve name confusion. Cook Political Report has already moved the race from favouring the incumbent to a genuine toss-up.

Deep Analysis

Root Causes

Alaska's top-four ranked-choice primary was designed to prevent vote-splitting between similar candidates by letting voters rank every option. That design assumes voters can tell the candidates apart in the first place.

When two candidates share an identical name and party label, ranking both does not resolve the underlying problem: a voter who cannot identify which Sullivan is the incumbent may rank them interchangeably, diluting the incumbent's first-choice advantage regardless of how the ballot is structured. The reinstatement exploits a gap in RCV's anti-spoiler design rather than a flaw the system was built to catch.

Sources:Anchorage Daily News

Mentions:Alaska Supreme Court →Mary Peltola →Cook Political Report →Alaska →Sabato's Crystal Ball →Scott Kendall →Dan S. Sullivan →Dan J. Sullivan →Kyle Kondik →

First Reported In

Update #12 · Voter-data drive stalls; jobs turn soft

Anchorage Daily News· 9 Jul 2026

Read original →

Causes and effects

Caused by

Alaska blocks the second Dan Sullivan

The Alaska Supreme Court's reinstatement reversed the Division of Elections' 15 June disqualification.

Occurred 12 Jun 2026

Read story →

This Event

Two Dan Sullivans, one Alaska toss-up

A name-duplicate quirk under ranked-choice voting can shave a decisive few points from an incumbent without a single voter changing their mind.

Led to

Peltola leads Sullivan by 0.3 points

Dan J. Sullivan, reinstated to the ballot in June, holds part of the first choices the ranked-choice count will redistribute.

Occurred 4 Nov 2026

Read story →

Different Perspectives

University of Florida Election Lab

The lab, run by Michael McDonald, estimates about 124.3 million ballots, a raw midterm record, and turnout of about 49.4% of eligible voters, second to 2018's 50.05%. The raw record reflects population growth more than a record rate, so the late count is working through a near-2018 electorate.

Thune's critics on the right, including Senator Ron Johnson

Ron Johnson backed the failed 31-15 motion to delay Thune's re-election, after activists such as Mike Cernovich blamed the leader for the defeat. Their complaint is that Republicans could have passed the SAVE Act; in January it meets a Democratic Senate instead.

Senator John Thune

Thune was re-elected Senate Republican leader by acclamation on 10 November after a motion to delay failed 31-15. He kept the filibuster that stopped the SAVE Act, the choice his critics on the right blame for the defeat.

House Republicans under Jim Jordan

House Republicans elected Jordan minority leader by 106 votes to 73 over Steve Scalise on 10 November, after Speaker Mike Johnson declined to run. They replaced the leadership that lost the majority, while Senate Republicans kept theirs.

Donald Trump

Trump asked on Truth Social on 9 November whether anybody believed the election "was honest" and blamed the machines, having told The New York Times on polling night he would accept the results. No Republican campaign had sued over a 2026 result by 10 November, so the claim has no case behind it.

Judge David O. Carter

Carter closed the Justice Department's suit over about 20,000 California mail ballots on 10 November after the department withdrew it, writing that the suit "attempted to disrupt an ongoing election". The closure leaves the department with no court order touching a 2026 California ballot.

Written with AI from Lowdown's published reporting. Not individually reviewed by an editor. Editorial standards.