1OCT

Judge dismisses DOJ's Georgia voter suit

2 min read

15:11UTC

Judge Victoria Marie Calvert threw out the Justice Department's demand for Georgia's unredacted voter list on 30 September, holding that a 1960 civil-rights law does not override the state's privacy rules.

← Back to Bulk voter citizenship checks are back Jump to analysis ↓

PoliticsAssessed

Key takeaway

A federal judge ruled that Georgia's privacy law shields its voter data from the Justice Department.

Judge Victoria Marie Calvert of the Northern District of Georgia, the federal trial court in Atlanta, dismissed the Department of Justice's suit for Georgia's unredacted voter list on 30 September, without leave to amend, so the department cannot file a revised complaint in the case⁠¹. United States v. Raffensperger is one of the department's suits against about 30 states and the District of Columbia for full voter lists. Calvert held that Title III of the Civil Rights Act of 1960 does not preempt Georgia's voter-privacy law.

Secretary of State Brad Raffensperger, a Republican, need not hand over dates of birth, Social Security numbers or driver licence numbers. Footnote 17 sets out why. Georgia law releases confidential voter data to a federal agency only if it is used solely to identify the voter and kept confidential, and the Court found the department "has disavowed that its purpose is limited to identifying the elector in its database and has not agreed that the information would remain confidential".

The department's refusal to accept those limits, more than any federal supremacy argument, kept the data under Georgia law. Democracy Docket, a litigation tracker founded by Democratic lawyer Marc Elias, counts the ruling as the department's 26th straight loss in these suits, one more than the Washington dismissal of 23 September⁠².

Deep Analysis

In plain English

Every state keeps a list of registered voters. The US Justice Department has sued about 30 states and Washington, DC, for their full lists, including private details such as dates of birth and Social Security numbers. Georgia's Secretary of State, Brad Raffensperger, is a Republican. He sent a version with those private details removed, citing Georgia's privacy law. On 30 September Judge Victoria Marie Calvert, in Atlanta, said Georgia was right to do so. The judge dismissed the case without leave to amend, so the department cannot simply fix its complaint and refile in her court. It can still appeal.

Deep Analysis

Root Causes

Georgia law lets confidential voter data go to a federal agency only if the agency uses it solely to identify voters and keeps it confidential. Raffensperger had already sent a redacted list after his letter of 8 December 2025. The department wanted the withheld fields: dates of birth, Social Security numbers and driver licence numbers.

The department first sued in Georgia's Middle District, lost on jurisdiction in January 2026 and refiled with a single Title III claim. That narrowed the case to one question, whether a 1960 records statute overrides a state privacy law, and Judge Calvert answered no.

Georgia already shares data with ERIC, the multi-state list-checking group, through one-way hashing. the Court found that consistent with state law, which shows the state has a lawful route for cross-checks that does not hand over raw numbers.

What could happen next?

Precedent
A Republican-run election office has now beaten the department's voter-list demand, so the losing run no longer divides along party lines.
Risk
An appeal to the 11th Circuit would put Title III's reach over state voter-privacy laws before a second tier of judges.

Source Landscape

This story draws on neutral-leaning sources

Primary parallel: In Kennedy v. Lynd in 1962 the 5th Circuit upheld the Justice Department's Title III demand for voting records in Forrest County, Mississippi, where Black residents were being refused registration. The law was built to expose discrimination by local registrars, and the courts enforced it for that purpose.

Counter-parallel: In 2017 the Presidential Advisory Commission on Election Integrity asked every state for its voter file, including partial Social Security numbers. Many states refused the sensitive fields, and the commission disbanded in January 2018 without a national list.

Consensus view: Judge Calvert found that Title III of the Civil Rights Act of 1960 does not preempt Georgia's privacy statute, O.C.G.A. 21-2-225(b), in any of the three ways preemption can work. Her footnote 17 records the decisive fact: the department 'has disavowed that its purpose is limited to identifying the elector' and would not agree to keep the data confidential.

Counter-view: The department reads Title III as a federal power to inspect election records that a state statute cannot narrow. Its losing run, now including the Washington dismissal of 23 September, shows district judges rejecting that reading in state after state.

Key tension: Whether the department wants the data to check rolls or to build a national file. Its refusal to limit its own use, on the record in Georgia, is what kept the state's law in force.

First Reported In

Update #19 · Bulk voter citizenship checks are back

US District Court for the Northern District of Georgia· 1 Oct 2026

Read original →

Causes and effects

Caused by

Dhillon plans 1,000 DOJ poll monitors

The Georgia dismissal extended DOJ's losing run one past the 23 September Washington dismissal.

Occurred 22 Sept 2026

Read story →

This Event

Judge dismisses DOJ's Georgia voter suit

The Justice Department's drive for states' full voter lists has now lost even against a Republican-run election office, and in Georgia it cannot refile.

Different Perspectives

Judge Mary Geiger Lewis, US District Court for the District of South Carolina

Lewis dismissed on standing, without prejudice, the challenge by the South Carolina NAACP and three voters with disabilities to limits on who may help voters. The limits, including a cap of five voters per assistant, stand for the 3 November Senate election.

Judge Victoria Marie Calvert, US District Court for the Northern District of Georgia

Calvert dismissed the Justice Department's suit for Georgia's unredacted voter list on 30 September, holding that the 1960 Civil Rights Act does not override state privacy law. Secretary of State Brad Raffensperger need not hand over birth dates, Social Security numbers or licence numbers.

Chad Bianco, Riverside County Sheriff

Bianco, ordered by the state supreme court on 24 September to return about 650,000 Proposition 50 ballots, called his seizure a lawful investigation. He told CalMatters he would appeal to the federal courts.

Fairshake network, through Defend American Jobs

Fairshake, the crypto-industry super PAC, has said it will spend $30 million against Sherrod Brown, and Defend American Jobs, which the Washington Times places in its network, filed $11.46 million in Ohio. The Washington Times reports that the ads do not mention cryptocurrency.

Texas PAC

The super PAC reported $61.41 million of new spending on 30 September, its two largest lines opposing James Talarico and supporting Ken Paxton. Its race total of $131.53 million is the largest outside effort in any Senate contest this week, with donors undisclosed until 15 October.

Sabato's Crystal Ball

Sabato moved three Virginia seats on 29 September, putting Jen Kiggans's 2nd District at Leans Democratic and the 1st at Toss-up. It wrote that a Democratic win in the 5th, now Leans Republican, would fit a 2006-style wave.