Skip to content
Welcome, thoughtbot's Giant Robots listeners!Start here
US Midterms 2026
24SEP

Trump's voting order blocked for good

2 min read
11:45UTC

Judge Denise Casper in Boston turned her injunction of Trump's 31 March voting executive order into a permanent block, ruling the president has no authority over how states run elections.

PoliticsDeveloping
Key takeaway

A permanent injunction removes Trump's voting executive order as a route to his citizenship-check goal.

Judge Denise Casper, a federal district judge in Boston, converted her earlier injunction of Donald Trump's 31 March voting executive order into a permanent block on Wednesday 24 June, ruling that the president has no authority over how states run their elections⁠1. The order had sought to impose a documentary proof-of-citizenship requirement and other voting changes by executive fiat. Casper's ruling landed the same day the Sixth Circuit shut the litigation route to detailed voter files.

The executive order had already been largely blocked in the spring, when courts enjoined most of its provisions; Casper's ruling makes that block permanent and removes the order as a fallback. The White House has meanwhile stopped issuing new election-related executive orders, having signed none through the late-April window when its programme first stalled. Election policy has shifted instead into the courts, where The Administration keeps losing, and into Congress, where it is stuck.

Deep Analysis

In plain English

Back in March, Trump signed an executive order trying to change how states run elections, including a rule about proof of citizenship for voters. Judges in three different courts quickly blocked most of it, ruling that a president cannot rewrite election rules by decree because the Constitution gives that power to states and Congress instead. One judge, Denise Casper in Boston, had only paused the order temporarily while the case continued. She has now made that pause permanent, meaning this version of the order cannot come back into force unless a higher court reverses her.

What could happen next?
  • Consequence

    Trump's 31 March voting order cannot be reissued in its original form without a higher court reversing Casper, closing off the one provision, the DHS and DOGE voter-file review, that had continued operating.

First Reported In

Update #11 · Money uncapped, ballot rules untouched

ABC News· 1 Jul 2026
Read original →
Causes and effects
This Event
Trump's voting order blocked for good
The permanent block removes the executive order as a fallback route to the administration's proof-of-citizenship voting goal.
Different Perspectives
University of Florida Election Lab
University of Florida Election Lab
The lab, run by Michael McDonald, estimates about 124.3 million ballots, a raw midterm record, and turnout of about 49.4% of eligible voters, second to 2018's 50.05%. The raw record reflects population growth more than a record rate, so the late count is working through a near-2018 electorate.
Thune's critics on the right, including Senator Ron Johnson
Thune's critics on the right, including Senator Ron Johnson
Ron Johnson backed the failed 31-15 motion to delay Thune's re-election, after activists such as Mike Cernovich blamed the leader for the defeat. Their complaint is that Republicans could have passed the SAVE Act; in January it meets a Democratic Senate instead.
Senator John Thune
Senator John Thune
Thune was re-elected Senate Republican leader by acclamation on 10 November after a motion to delay failed 31-15. He kept the filibuster that stopped the SAVE Act, the choice his critics on the right blame for the defeat.
House Republicans under Jim Jordan
House Republicans under Jim Jordan
House Republicans elected Jordan minority leader by 106 votes to 73 over Steve Scalise on 10 November, after Speaker Mike Johnson declined to run. They replaced the leadership that lost the majority, while Senate Republicans kept theirs.
Donald Trump
Donald Trump
Trump asked on Truth Social on 9 November whether anybody believed the election "was honest" and blamed the machines, having told The New York Times on polling night he would accept the results. No Republican campaign had sued over a 2026 result by 10 November, so the claim has no case behind it.
Judge David O. Carter
Judge David O. Carter
Carter closed the Justice Department's suit over about 20,000 California mail ballots on 10 November after the department withdrew it, writing that the suit "attempted to disrupt an ongoing election". The closure leaves the department with no court order touching a 2026 California ballot.

Written with AI from Lowdown's published reporting. Not individually reviewed by an editor. Editorial standards.