Skip to content
Welcome, thoughtbot's Giant Robots listeners!Start here
US Midterms 2026
24SEP

Trump Economic Approval Drops to 31 Percent

2 min read
11:45UTC

Multiple polls show Trump's economic approval at 31-35%, with 56% of Republicans saying tariffs raise prices. Lower-income voters have shifted 7 points toward Democrats since January 2025.

PoliticsDeveloping
Key takeaway

A majority of Republicans now say tariffs raise prices, eroding the party's economic insulation.

A YouGov/Economist survey (20-23 March) found 35% approval for Trump's economic handling; CNN polling (26-30 March) found 31%⁠1. Quinnipiac polling shows 75% of Americans, including 56% of Republicans, believe tariffs are raising prices. Lower-income voters have shifted 7 points toward Democrats since January 2025.

The Republican-voter figure is the one that matters for midterm projections. When a majority of the president's own base agrees that his trade policy raises their costs, the political insulation that partisanship normally provides begins to erode. The 7-point shift among lower-income voters is the transmission mechanism: tariff costs concentrate in food, fuel, and imported consumer goods, the categories that consume the largest share of lower-income household budgets.

The Georgia 14th result provides a concrete test case. Shawn Harris campaigned on the price of feed, fertiliser, and petrol, not abstract policy, in a district where those costs dominate daily life. His historic overperformance occurred in precisely the demographic and geographic territory these polls describe. The generic ballot shift to D+5.5 may reflect a national average that masks larger swings in communities where tariff exposure is most direct.

Deep Analysis

In plain English

Cook Political Report and Sabato's Crystal Ball are the two most widely cited services that rate how competitive each congressional district is. They use a sliding scale from 'Safe Democrat' through 'Toss-up' to 'Safe Republican'. When districts move on these scales, it signals that expert forecasters think the seat has become more competitive. Pennsylvania's 8th District (around Scranton) moved from 'Lean Republican' , meaning Republicans were expected to win fairly comfortably , to 'Toss-up', meaning either party could win. Ohio's 1st District (Cincinnati area) moved even further, to 'Lean Democrat'. Both raters moved on the same day, after the Georgia and Wisconsin results. PA-08 is historically important because it has voted for the winning presidential candidate in every election since 2008. When it enters competitive territory, experienced forecasters treat it as an early warning signal for broader Republican vulnerability across the House.

Deep Analysis
Root Causes

Ratings services move when two independent conditions align: polling shifts and structural district vulnerability. PA-08's movement to Toss-up reflects both.

Structurally, PA-08 (northeastern Pennsylvania, Scranton area) is the working-class district with the highest density of union-household voters who have split between parties in consecutive cycles. It has a higher concentration of workers in tariff-sensitive industries , steel, manufacturing, logistics , than almost any other competitive district. The same input cost pressures that moved GA-14 are operating here, but through manufacturing supply chains rather than agricultural inputs.

The polling shift (Trump economic approval at 31-35%) translates directly to PA-08 because district-level retrospective economic voting is tightly correlated with presidential approval. A 30% presidential economic approval in a district where the president won by 3 points in 2024 effectively inverts the partisan lean.

What could happen next?
  • Consequence

    If PA-08 turns competitive and the D+5.5 model underestimates actual movement, districts currently rated Safe Republican begin entering the forecast model's competitive tier , expanding the total number of at-risk Republican seats beyond the current 12-20 projection.

  • Risk

    Coordinated dual-rater movement on the same day may signal polling methodology consensus rather than independent evidence, making the convergence vulnerable to the same systematic Republican-voter undercount that affected 2024 forecasts.

First Reported In

Update #2 · First votes exceed every forecast

YouGov/Economist· 12 Apr 2026
Read original →
Causes and effects
This Event
Trump Economic Approval Drops to 31 Percent
A bipartisan consensus that tariffs raise prices, combined with a 7-point lower-income voter shift, provides the economic mechanism beneath the electoral overperformance visible in Georgia and Wisconsin.
Different Perspectives
University of Florida Election Lab
University of Florida Election Lab
The lab, run by Michael McDonald, estimates about 124.3 million ballots, a raw midterm record, and turnout of about 49.4% of eligible voters, second to 2018's 50.05%. The raw record reflects population growth more than a record rate, so the late count is working through a near-2018 electorate.
Thune's critics on the right, including Senator Ron Johnson
Thune's critics on the right, including Senator Ron Johnson
Ron Johnson backed the failed 31-15 motion to delay Thune's re-election, after activists such as Mike Cernovich blamed the leader for the defeat. Their complaint is that Republicans could have passed the SAVE Act; in January it meets a Democratic Senate instead.
Senator John Thune
Senator John Thune
Thune was re-elected Senate Republican leader by acclamation on 10 November after a motion to delay failed 31-15. He kept the filibuster that stopped the SAVE Act, the choice his critics on the right blame for the defeat.
House Republicans under Jim Jordan
House Republicans under Jim Jordan
House Republicans elected Jordan minority leader by 106 votes to 73 over Steve Scalise on 10 November, after Speaker Mike Johnson declined to run. They replaced the leadership that lost the majority, while Senate Republicans kept theirs.
Donald Trump
Donald Trump
Trump asked on Truth Social on 9 November whether anybody believed the election "was honest" and blamed the machines, having told The New York Times on polling night he would accept the results. No Republican campaign had sued over a 2026 result by 10 November, so the claim has no case behind it.
Judge David O. Carter
Judge David O. Carter
Carter closed the Justice Department's suit over about 20,000 California mail ballots on 10 November after the department withdrew it, writing that the suit "attempted to disrupt an ongoing election". The closure leaves the department with no court order touching a 2026 California ballot.

Written with AI from Lowdown's published reporting. Not individually reviewed by an editor. Editorial standards.