Skip to content
Welcome, thoughtbot's Giant Robots listeners!Start here
US Midterms 2026
15SEP

Sabato moves three races for governor

2 min read
14:21UTC

Sabato's Crystal Ball moved Florida toward the Democrats, Michigan toward the Democrats and New Mexico out of contention on 23 July, for three unrelated reasons.

PoliticsDeveloping
Key takeaway

Each rating change turns on local candidates and money, not on a shift in the national environment.

J. Miles Coleman, an analyst at Sabato's Crystal Ball, moved Florida's governor's race from Safe Republican to Likely Republican on 23 July, after a University of North Florida poll put Byron Donalds five points clear of David Jolly, 46% to 41%⁠1. Coleman set his own limit on the reading in the same piece, writing that "we would not call Florida truly competitive". Neither party defends an incumbent governor in Florida this November, and open seats tighten as polling day nears.

Michigan went from Toss-up to Leans Democratic. Mike Duggan, the Democrat turned independent whose candidacy had split the anti-Republican vote, left the race, and the straight two-way contest that remains favours Jocelyn Benson, the secretary of state and Democratic nominee⁠2. New Mexico moved to Safe Democratic, where Deb Haaland holds roughly a seven-to-one cash advantage over her Republican opponent and the state Republican party is fighting itself.

Ratings services relabelling their own categories is not news in the way a court ruling is, and one university poll is thin evidence. What makes the release worth reading is that the three rationales share nothing: a poll, a withdrawal, a bank balance. Sabato's Crystal Ball moved six House seats toward the Democrats in May while calling the national map close, and these three moves do not extend that. Florida's 24R-4D congressional map stands where the Florida Supreme Court left it in June, untouched by anything in the governor's numbers. Who is running, and how well a state party has organised behind them, is doing the work here.

Deep Analysis

In plain English

Election forecasters like Sabato's Crystal Ball sort races into categories such as Safe, Likely or Toss-up, based on how confident they are about who will win. On 23 July, the Crystal Ball moved three governor's races: Florida became slightly less safe for Republicans, Michigan became slightly more likely for Democrats, and New Mexico became very safe for Democrats. None of these three races has an incumbent running for re-election, which is why they can move more easily than a race where a sitting governor is on the ballot.

Deep Analysis
Root Causes

A ratings category like Safe, Likely or Toss-up measures a forecaster's confidence in the eventual winner, not a poll number by itself. Florida moved one notch because a single data point, the Donalds-Jolly poll, arrived alongside a change in candidate behaviour that forecasters read as informative.

Michigan and New Mexico moved for a different structural reason entirely: an open seat with no incumbent is inherently more volatile than one where an incumbent's approval rating anchors the outcome, so a single exit, Mike Duggan's, or a single fundraising gap, Deb Haaland's, can shift an open-seat rating in a way that would barely move an incumbent's.

What could happen next?
  • Meaning

    None of the three rating moves turns on the national political environment; each turns on candidate-specific factors, which is why they should not be read as evidence of a broader national swing.

First Reported In

Update #14 · 0-for-17 in court, and the map that held

Sabato's Crystal Ball, UVA Center for Politics· 26 Jul 2026
Read original →
Different Perspectives
Department of Justice (DOJ)
Department of Justice (DOJ)
DOJ appealed to the 9th Circuit after Judge David O. Carter did not rule by a noon deadline on 22 October that DOJ itself had set, seeking to have California set aside mail ballots from more than 20,000 listed voters. Its case is that ineligible votes cancel lawful ones; the panel dismissed the appeal 2-1 on 26 October.
Lower Costs Now
Lower Costs Now
Lower Costs Now reported $7.37m in Kansas on 24 and 25 October, part of $65.65m in Senate races since its first independent expenditure on 1 October, including $17.21m for Josh Turek in Iowa. Its FEC filings show $50.18m raised by 14 October.
MAGA Inc
MAGA Inc
MAGA Inc, the super PAC aligned with Donald Trump, filed $7.20m against James Talarico on 22 October, taking its Texas spending to $37.65m. Of that, $30.12m is against Talarico and $7.53m is for Ken Paxton, the Republican nominee.
Senate Majority PAC (SMP)
Senate Majority PAC (SMP)
SMP's pre-general report shows it spent $108.70m from 1 to 14 October, including $65.0m to WinSenate and $10.0m to Texas Forever, and ended with $32.72m. Texas Forever has reported $19.40m against Ken Paxton since 1 October.
Senate Leadership Fund (SLF)
Senate Leadership Fund (SLF)
SLF's pre-general report shows $88.42m in cash on 14 October and $18.98m raised in the fortnight, none of it from Elon Musk. It has since reported $12.07m against Sherrod Brown in Ohio, and its $2.7m to Plains PAC preceded that committee's first Kansas buy on 25 October.
National Republican Senatorial Committee (NRSC)
National Republican Senatorial Committee (NRSC)
The NRSC's pre-general report shows nothing spent with Ashley Hinson in Iowa, or with its nominees in six other states, from 1 to 14 October, after $5.54m with Hinson in September. It took no new loan and ended the fortnight with $25.20m in cash and $20m of debt.

Written with AI from Lowdown's published reporting. Not individually reviewed by an editor. Editorial standards.