Skip to content
Welcome, thoughtbot's Giant Robots listeners!Start here
Russia-Ukraine War 2026
20MAR

Ukraine gains 400 sq km in February

3 min read
17:04UTC

Commander-in-Chief Syrskyi says Ukrainian forces reclaimed 300–400 sq km in the south during February — more than Russia gained in the same period. Independent verification is pending.

ConflictDeveloping
Key takeaway

Ukraine's southern advance forces Russia to choose between Donetsk encirclement and southern flank defence.

Commander-in-Chief Oleksandr Syrskyi reported on 2 March that Ukrainian forces captured approximately 300–400 sq km in the Zaporizhzhia–Dnipropetrovsk sector during February — more territory than Russia took in the same period⁠1. President Zelenskyy confirmed the gains on the war's fourth anniversary. Independent satellite verification from open-source intelligence groups had not emerged at the time of reporting⁠2.

The claim requires context. Through 2025, Russian forces advanced at roughly 171 square miles per month across the front, built on infantry-wave tactics and glide-bomb superiority that had ground down Ukrainian defensive lines since the failure of the 2023 counter-offensive. February's reversal — Ukraine's strongest relative performance since the Kursk incursion of August 2024 — does not mean the front has shifted in Kyiv's strategic favour. It means that in one sector, Ukraine's drone-and-artillery integration temporarily outpaced Russia's adaptation cycle.

The location matters. The Zaporizhzhia–Dnipropetrovsk axis is not the Donetsk front where Russia has concentrated its forces since Pokrovsk fell in December 2025. Ukraine exploited thinner Russian lines in the south while Russian command kept its weight in the east, pressing toward Kostiantynivka with the aim of encircling Kramatorsk and Sloviansk. The gains may reflect Russian overextension across a 1,000 km front as much as Ukrainian offensive capability.

Russia has consistently responded to Ukrainian territorial gains — Kherson in November 2022, the early days of Kursk in August 2024 — with redeployment and counter-attack within weeks. If Moscow pulls forces from the Donetsk axis to contest the southern gains, it relieves pressure on Ukraine's eastern anchor cities. If it does not, Ukraine consolidates ground that becomes a bargaining chip in any resumption of the Abu Dhabi process. Either outcome gives Kyiv something it has lacked for months: the initiative to force a Russian choice.

Deep Analysis

In plain English

Picture the front line as a 1,000-kilometre rope in a tug-of-war. Most months Russia pulls more rope its way. In February, Ukraine pulled back enough to match or beat Russia's gains — the first time that's happened since the Kursk incursion in August 2024. This doesn't mean the war is turning. Russia still holds 20% of Ukraine and is pressing hard toward two major cities in the east. What it means is that Ukraine found a way to make its drones and artillery work together more effectively in the flatter southern terrain, where coordination is easier than in Donetsk's bombed-out urban battlespace. The question now is whether Russia will pull forces away from its eastern push to defend the south — a choice with real costs either way.

Deep Analysis
Synthesis

Ukraine appears to be applying a lateral-pressure strategy: advancing in the south while defending in the east to stretch Russian force allocation across incompatible simultaneous demands. This mirrors Soviet deep-battle doctrine — apply pressure at multiple points to prevent the enemy concentrating decisive mass anywhere. Whether Ukraine has the logistical depth to sustain both simultaneously is the test the coming weeks will answer.

Root Causes

The Zaporizhzhia-Dnipropetrovsk sector's open, flat terrain amplifies Ukrainian drone-artillery coordination advantages relative to Donetsk's urban battlespace, where close combat and rubble degrade targeting cycles. Russia's force density in the south has been deliberately thinned since late 2025 to sustain the primary Donetsk axis — February's Ukrainian gains partly exploit a self-created Russian gap rather than a frontline collapse.

Escalation

Russia's most probable response is intensified aerial bombardment of newly captured positions rather than major force redeployment from Donetsk. Full redeployment would sacrifice the Kramatorsk encirclement timeline, which has been Moscow's primary operational objective since late 2025. Aerial escalation is lower-cost and consistent with Russia's established doctrine of using glide bombs and drones to deny Ukrainian consolidation. Expect localised armoured counterattacks in the south alongside continued Donetsk pressure — not an either/or force shift.

What could happen next?
  • Consequence

    Russia will intensify aerial bombardment of the Zaporizhzhia sector to deny Ukrainian consolidation of newly captured positions, likely within days.

    Immediate · Assessed
  • Risk

    Ukrainian overextension — advancing beyond what mine-clearance and logistics can support — could expose newly held ground to rapid Russian armoured counterattack in March.

    Short term · Suggested
  • Opportunity

    Sustained southern pressure forces Russia into a force-allocation dilemma that could slow the Kostiantynivka advance and buy time for Kramatorsk-Sloviansk defences.

    Medium term · Suggested
  • Meaning

    Ukraine has demonstrated simultaneous offensive and defensive capability across multiple sectors, a qualitative threshold it had not clearly met since 2022.

    Short term · Assessed
First Reported In

Update #1 · Ukraine best month as Russia triples drones

Kyiv Independent· 3 Mar 2026
Read original →
Different Perspectives
Government of Latvia
Government of Latvia
Latvia abstained on 22 September when the EU renewed its individual sanctions for 36 months at the price of delisting Alisher Usmanov and Mikhail Fridman, and promised national sanctions of its own. Riga's abstention marks how far a frontline member state will go to keep listed names listed.
India's Ministry of External Affairs
India's Ministry of External Affairs
After the House passed the Graham bill on 16 September, India's foreign ministry said it would keep buying energy on market terms and protect its trade. Russia supplied 30.3% of India's crude imports in fiscal 2026, so the tariff decision due around 18 October falls directly on New Delhi.
Kaja Kallas, EU foreign policy chief
Kaja Kallas, EU foreign policy chief
Kallas answered the US licence on 10 October by saying Europe would not ease pressure, and EU ministers adopted a 22nd package of nearly 1,600 listings two days later. Brussels is tightening as Washington loosens, though TASS reported the package adds no significant new trade restrictions.
Donald Trump and the US Treasury
Donald Trump and the US Treasury
The Treasury licensed Russian diesel imports until 7 April 2027 on the day of Trump's call with Putin, and Trump then told reporters Ukraine should find a new leader. Washington is trading sanctions relief for fuel supply while pressing Kyiv to halt the refinery strikes behind the shortage.
Kremlin and Deputy Prime Minister Alexander Novak
Kremlin and Deputy Prime Minister Alexander Novak
After the 9 October call the Kremlin said Russia was ready to supply oil and petroleum products to American and global markets, and Novak brought forward the end of diesel export curbs. Moscow is selling the shortage back as goodwill, with volumes that Decree No. 686 now hides from outside checks.
Volodymyr Zelenskyy, President of Ukraine
Volodymyr Zelenskyy, President of Ukraine
Zelenskyy called GL 135 an investment in prolonging the war and offered to stop striking Russian refineries if Russia stops destroying Ukraine's energy system. Answering Trump's call for a new leader, he set a total 60-day ceasefire as the condition for elections, which puts the next move on Moscow.