A Federal Register query on 4 August for Section 301 digital documents published since 24 July returned nine items, none of them concerning EU digital enforcement, and USTR, the Office of the US Trade Representative, carries nothing newer on its press index than a 23 July statement1. The Section 301 digital-enforcement investigation ordered on 24 July therefore has no docket number, no notice and no comment period on the public record. An investigation can run for weeks before its notice publishes, so the finding bounds the paperwork rather than the policy behind it.
Google shows no visible appeal against the €890m fine imposed on 23 July under the Digital Markets Act, the EU's competition rulebook for large platforms. the Commission's own enforcement pages list nothing since the decision2, and the Court of Justice of the European Union case register runs on a JavaScript form our tooling cannot query. We read the Official Journal C series issues of 3 and 4 August and found no action naming the company3. The actions those issues do carry were lodged six to seven weeks earlier, so this route could not surface a filing made since 23 July even if one exists. The compliance deadline falls on 21 September.
Poland's technology sovereignty test for public contracts is unchecked rather than stalled. The Sejm's listing of new bills returned a CAPTCHA challenge on 4 August and we hold no bill number for a direct query4, so whether the bill has reached the order paper remains unknown. Three separate registries, three different obstacles, and in each case the honest description is that we looked and could not see, not that nothing happened.
