Skip to content
Briefings are running a touch slower this week while we rebuild the foundations.See roadmap
Russia-Ukraine War 2026
5APR

Brent's worst month since the Covid crash

3 min read
19:51UTC

Brent Crude settled at $92.05 on Friday 29 May, down more than 19% across the month, its steepest monthly fall since the March 2020 Covid crash, on deal optimism alone.

ConflictDeveloping
Key takeaway

Futures and war-risk insurers read the same war apart: oil down nearly a fifth, yet Lloyd's unchanged.

Brent Crude settled at $92.05 per barrel on Friday 29 May, down more than 19% across May, its steepest monthly fall since the March 2020 Covid crash 1. That is roughly $20 below the $112.10 peak of Monday 18 May, a drop booked in 11 trading sessions, the fastest repricing of the conflict. WTI (West Texas Intermediate), the US oil benchmark, closed near $87.86.

The fall came on diplomatic optimism alone, with no instrument signed. Brent is the global price benchmark for two-thirds of traded crude, so the relief at the pump rests on a deal that could still collapse.

Two markets are reading the same war and pricing it apart. Futures price the probability of a signed page, and traders have bet heavily on one arriving. War-risk underwriters require the page itself. Lloyd's of London has still not de-listed Hormuz from its war-risk register, holding the divergence it opened when Brent first broke $100 .

When Iranian state television aired draft terms on Wednesday 27 May, Brent briefly touched a sub-$95 low before a White House denial reversed it . Friday's settle went lower and stayed there. The deal-optimism premium is unhedged against an unsigned outcome, so a collapse would reverse the move faster than the original war spike built it.

Deep Analysis

In plain English

Brent crude is the main global oil price benchmark, used to set the cost of petrol, diesel, and heating oil worldwide. In May 2026 it fell more than 19%, its steepest monthly drop since March 2020 when Covid stopped most economic activity. Traders became optimistic about a deal to reopen the Strait of Hormuz, pushing prices down. Trump walked out of his Situation Room meeting without signing it. Lloyd's of London, which insures ships sailing through the strait, kept its 'war-risk' designation in place: that designation requires shipping companies to pay tens of millions of dollars in extra insurance per voyage. Lloyd's changes that designation only when a government certifies the area is safe, not when traders feel optimistic. The result is a $20 gap between what futures markets think and what shipping insurers think.

Deep Analysis
Root Causes

Brent's 19% monthly fall reflects a single pricing event: the market's belief, from 27 May, that a Hormuz reopening was days away. Oil futures markets reprice on probability estimates, not on signed documents. The $20 fall in 11 sessions is the market assigning roughly 70-80% probability to a near-term deal, based on the volume of diplomatic signals and the public statements from both sides.

Lloyd's and the futures market diverge because they face different update mechanisms. A futures desk resets its position in milliseconds on a headline. A Lloyd's Joint Hull Committee changes its war-risk designation on a quarterly review cycle, requiring physical evidence of changed security conditions, not optimistic commentary. The two institutions are pricing the same strait but on entirely different information-update schedules.

What could happen next?
  • Risk

    A deal collapse reprices Brent from $92 toward $110-$115 with no hedging floor in place, as the entire $20 fall was deal-optimism premium rather than supply recovery.

  • Consequence

    European hauliers and airline fuel desks that locked forward contracts during the $92-$95 window face margin exposure if the kinetic track resumes.

First Reported In

Update #113 · Trump signs nothing as a Hellfire hits a hull

CNBC· 31 May 2026
Read original
Different Perspectives
North Korea / DPRK
North Korea / DPRK
ISW confirmed the first mounting of DPRK Type-75 MLRS on Russian autonomous UGVs near Kharkiv on 7 June, the latest step in a supply axis that escalated from shells in 2023 to troops in 2024. Pyongyang gains live battlefield data on its ordnance and on Russia's uncrewed-systems programme.
IAEA / Rafael Grossi
IAEA / Rafael Grossi
Grossi confirmed Chornobyl structural damage with nuclear material metres away and could not attribute the ZNPP 15-hour blackout during the agreed repair window. Six ceasefires brokered and broken at ZNPP, compounded by Rosatom's May attack on IAEA neutrality, have eroded his ability to enforce the windows he negotiates.
Emmanuel Macron / France
Emmanuel Macron / France
Macron co-signed the E3 framework whose line-of-contact baseline marks Europe's first formal acceptance that 1991 borders are not the opening position. France's role carries weight because Macron had previously proposed a European force for Ukraine, and the framework's multinational force point is the vehicle for that.
Keir Starmer / E3
Keir Starmer / E3
Starmer, Macron and Merz met Zelenskyy on 7 June and backed a five-point framework taking the line of contact as the talks baseline, conceding roughly one fifth of Ukraine in exchange for a multinational force and frozen assets. With US mediation ended, the NATO Ankara summit on 7-8 July is the next test.
Vladimir Putin / Kremlin
Vladimir Putin / Kremlin
Putin used SPIEF to reject Zelenskyy's summit letter, citing 'elements of rudeness', and repeated the pre-agreed treaty precondition that has frozen every diplomatic round since May. The SPIEF platform's message of investor confidence was punctured by naval fires visible from St Petersburg, which Moscow declined to dispute in scale.
Ukraine / Unmanned Systems Forces
Ukraine / Unmanned Systems Forces
Commander Brovdi confirmed USF units tracked and set fire to Boikyi at Kronstadt, while Code 9.2 struck the Chonhar Bridge the following day. Ukraine is sequencing strikes for rear-area interdiction and political timing rather than ground gains, trading the Baltic Fleet's home base for the logistics squeeze Russia cannot absorb without rationing its own occupied territory.