Skip to content
Briefings are running a touch slower this week while we rebuild the foundations.See roadmap
Iran Conflict 2026
9APR

Collins, Tillis back Murkowski's Iran AUMF draft

3 min read
11:02UTC

Republican senators Susan Collins and Thom Tillis publicly signalled support for Lisa Murkowski's pre-committee Iran AUMF on 25 April. The draft remains pre-referral with six days to the 1 May War Powers deadline.

ConflictDeveloping
Key takeaway

Two Republican signatures bring Murkowski's AUMF closer to markup before the 1 May War Powers deadline.

Senator Lisa Murkowski's Iran AUMF draft has not formally reached committee, but Susan Collins and Thom Tillis publicly signalled support on 25 April 1. Tillis told reporters he has been "in conversations with Murkowski about her proposal" and said it "would put to bed this whole narrative about whether Congress supports ongoing action". John Curtis of Utah signalled similar reservations about war authority. Josh Hawley's earlier AUMF push has gone quiet.

The Authorisation for the Use of Military Force is the formal congressional instrument that licenses the executive branch to keep US forces in hostilities. Without it, the War Powers Resolution of 1973 imposes a 60-day clock from the introduction of US Armed Forces into hostilities; the Senate rejected the fifth WPR by 51-46 on 22 April and Murkowski drafted the AUMF in the same week . If the vehicle reaches markup before 1 May it creates a bipartisan signed instrument the executive branch does not control, potentially binding operational authorities the President has so far exercised verbally.

Senate Democrats hold a further eight WPR resolutions in procedural reserve, which extends pressure into May regardless of what Murkowski produces by Friday 1 May. The exact start date for the WPR clock is contested, with 28 February (first CENTCOM engagement), 4 March (first confirmed hostile fire exchange), or a later date The Administration may argue. If the trigger date is challenged before the courts, the 1 May deadline could be extended without a Senate vote.

Deep Analysis

In plain English

The US Constitution gives Congress the power to declare war, but since the 1970s, presidents have fought wars using executive authority without a formal declaration. To put limits on this, Congress passed the War Powers Resolution in 1973, which says the president must get congressional approval within 60 days of starting military action, or stop. Trump launched strikes on Iran on 28 February 2026. The 60-day clock expires on 1 May 2026. Five Senate votes to end the war have failed. Now Senator Lisa Murkowski is working on a different approach: an AUMF (Authorization for Use of Military Force), which is a congressional vote to formally authorise the war already in progress, rather than to end it. The difference matters. A WPR vote to end the war is politically difficult (senators are seen as siding with Iran). An AUMF authorising the war is easier to vote for, but gives Congress a formal stake in how the war is conducted, including requiring disclosure and transparency Trump has so far avoided.

Deep Analysis
Root Causes

Two structural forces are pushing Senate Republicans toward the Murkowski AUMF rather than continued WPR rejection.

The first is the 51-46 WPR margin from 22 April. Five WPR votes have failed, but the margin is narrowing: the fourth vote failed 47-52, the fifth 51-46. John Fetterman crossing to Republicans and Rand Paul crossing to Democrats on the same vote confirms the coalition is unstable. Republicans who cannot hold the WPR line have an incentive to pre-empt further WPR votes by passing an AUMF that formally settles the legal question.

Thom Tillis announced he will not seek a third term, converting his North Carolina seat into an open contest. A senator with no re-election constraint is more willing to publicly support an independent oversight vehicle; Tillis's endorsement of Murkowski signals that the retiring-senator caucus may be the most tractable Republican constituency for any war-constraint measure.

What could happen next?
  • Opportunity

    If Murkowski's AUMF reaches the floor before 1 May and passes, it would produce the first formal signed Iran war instrument of the conflict, creating a legal baseline any subsequent diplomatic settlement would need to address.

    Immediate · 0.52
  • Risk

    An AUMF that passes without meaningful disclosure conditions would entrench the war's legal basis and reduce future congressional leverage, despite its proponents' stated transparency goals.

    Medium term · 0.68
  • Consequence

    Hawley's AUMF push has gone quiet (ID:2676); if Murkowski's vehicle advances, it consolidates the congressional war-authorisation debate around a transparency-focused text rather than Hawley's earlier harder-line version.

    Short term · 0.75
First Reported In

Update #79 · Islamabad 3 collapses; Witkoff grounded, talks stall

The Hill· 25 Apr 2026
Read original
Different Perspectives
Civilians and prisoners inside Iran
Civilians and prisoners inside Iran
Mojtaba Kian was hanged in under 50 days from arrest, the fastest wartime espionage case in Hengaw's record, as Trump announced a peace deal. Amnesty places Iran's 2026 execution count above 200 at its fastest pace in 44 years; the diplomatic track has not altered the internal enforcement tempo.
China
China
Beijing accepted a Pakistani civilian briefing mission on the same day OFAC's GL V expired, keeping itself inside the deal architecture without being a named signatory. How Chinese banks respond to Monday's Hengli dollar-clearing decision is the first real-world test of whether the verbal MOU carries any institutional weight.
Pakistan
Pakistan
Islamabad split its highest-level delegation: army chief Munir to Tehran on the security track, Prime Minister Sharif and Foreign Minister Dar to Beijing before Monday's GL V-driven bank compliance decision. The architecture routes the deal's hardest problem, IRGC buy-in, through the general-officer channel that has extracted every wartime concession.
Israeli government
Israeli government
An unnamed Israeli official told the Times of Israel that Trump privately told Netanyahu the deal will dismantle Iran's nuclear programme and remove all its uranium, terms incompatible with what Tehran and a Reuters source describe. If Netanyahu believes he was promised full dismantlement and the deal delivers less, Israel holds a sabotage veto before any signature.
Iranian Foreign Ministry
Iranian Foreign Ministry
Spokesman Esmail Baghaei told state agency IRNA that nuclear issues are 'not in the current negotiations text' and the sequencing is: end the war first, then negotiate nuclear over two months. Baghaei's formulation preserves Khamenei's 21 May uranium-stay directive while letting the civilian diplomacy track continue.
Donald Trump / White House
Donald Trump / White House
Trump declared the Iran deal 'largely negotiated' on 23 May via Truth Social and signed nothing; the White House's only paper was a Memorial Day proclamation. The verbal-track method converts maximum political signalling into minimum legal exposure: no congressional notification, no Senate treaty ratification, no instrument for Iran to formally reject.