Skip to content
You can now search across every topic, entity and event.What's new
Iran Conflict 2026
21SEP

Brent jumps 6% as oil ends its shrug

2 min read
15:34UTC

Brent crude rose about 6 per cent to roughly $78.67 a barrel on 8 July, its biggest jump since the war's opening spike in March.

ConflictDeveloping
Key takeaway

Brent jumped about 6 per cent, its biggest since the war's March spike, pricing escalation it had spent months ignoring.

Brent Crude rose to about $78.67 a barrel on 8 July, up roughly 6 per cent, with West Texas Intermediate (WTI) at about $74.82, its sharpest single-day rise since the war's opening spike in March . 1 Brent is the benchmark that prices about two-thirds of internationally traded crude, so a move of this size feeds petrol, diesel and airline fares within weeks. It had sat near $73 after the Al Rekayyat strike alone .

Prices fell through every earlier shock of this conflict. Brent dropped to $71.99 through the June bombing of Qeshm Island , and the second quarter closed down about 30 per cent, the steepest quarterly fall since 2020 . What moved the market this time was not one more incident but a strike and a retaliation landing in the same cycle, which raises the probability traders assign to an actual closure of the strait of Hormuz.

Saudi Arabia floated an expansion of a Red Sea pipeline to route crude around Hormuz, and tankers began making U-turns in the Gulf, according to trade reporting. 2 The thirty-five tankers that cleared the strait at pre-war rates on 2 July now move under a threat level the market has finally chosen to price. A Saudi pipeline, if pursued, is a multi-year structural hedge rather than a quick fix, and tanker diversions tighten Gulf supply just as OPEC+ was adding barrels.

Deep Analysis

In plain English

Brent Crude and West Texas Intermediate (WTI) are the two main global oil price benchmarks. Brent jumped about 6 per cent in a single day, its biggest one-day rise of the whole war, after the CENTCOM strikes and Iran's Gulf retaliation raised fears that tankers moving through the Strait of Hormuz, the narrow waterway carrying roughly a fifth of the world's oil, could come under attack or be blocked. Saudi Arabia responded by floating a plan to expand a pipeline that would let its oil bypass Hormuz entirely by crossing overland to the Red Sea instead.

Deep Analysis
Root Causes

Oil traders price Hormuz risk through tanker insurance and freight rates as much as through headline events: P&I Clubs had already kept their Hormuz war-risk exclusion in force after the 7 July Al Rekayyat strike, meaning underwriters were signalling elevated risk before Brent moved.

Saudi Arabia's floated Red Sea pipeline expansion revives bypass capacity the kingdom has held since the 1980s Petroline system; reviving it now signals Riyadh expects further volatility rather than a one-off shock.

What could happen next?
  • Consequence

    Saudi Arabia's Red Sea pipeline expansion, if pursued, would give Riyadh a durable hedge against future Hormuz disruption independent of any US or Iranian action.

  • Risk

    A sustained price spike above $80 would test whether P&I Clubs' war-risk exclusion pushes tankers to demand naval escort before transiting Hormuz.

First Reported In

Update #149 · The first thing Washington signed on Iran: a revocation

The National· 8 Jul 2026
Read original
Different Perspectives
Shipping and insurance industry
Shipping and insurance industry
UKMTO counted about 20 US-facilitated Hormuz transits a day to 11 September against only 6 visible on AIS, with traffic still around 90% below the 138-a-day pre-war baseline. War-risk underwriters cannot price hulls they cannot see, or resolve whether the tanker El Gaia hit a mine, as Iran claims, or a missile and drone, as CENTCOM says.
European refiners
European refiners
European refiners, including Poland's Orlen, absorbed a roughly $26 gap between Dated Brent at $130.80 on 15 September and ICE Brent futures settling at $103.87 on 18 September, a spread that widened from $13.45 on 9 September rather than newly opening. Their futures hedges no longer cover what they now pay for physical barrels.
Saudi Arabia
Saudi Arabia
Saudi Aramco zeroed European term customers' October allocations and rerouted roughly 60 million barrels to Asia through Ras Tanura and Sohar, using Red Sea and Gulf terminal capacity built years ago to cut Hormuz exposure. Riyadh reallocated existing supply rather than negotiating a shortfall with Europe.
Qatar
Qatar
Qatar's energy minister Saad al-Kaabi told Bloomberg at the Qatar Economic Forum on 20 September that Bessent's two-year Hormuz-obsolescence forecast is wrong, and that Doha has deliberately built no bypass pipeline. Qatar's gas exports run through one waterway by choice, not oversight.
Iran (foreign ministry and Majlis)
Iran (foreign ministry and Majlis)
Iran's foreign ministry and 130 Majlis deputies moved toward NPT withdrawal this week, with lawmaker Hossein-Ali Haji Deligani filing a triple-urgency bill on 20 September that Speaker Qalibaf has not yet scheduled. Tehran treats treaty membership as leverage still on the table, not yet spent.
Russia and China
Russia and China
Moscow and Beijing vetoed the Panel of Experts' renewal, maintaining Resolution 2231 lapsed in October 2025 and the 2025 snapback was never validly triggered, so the sanctions architecture the Panel enforces has no current legal standing. Both governments frame the veto as upholding law, not shielding Tehran.