Skip to content
You can now search across every topic, entity and event.What's new
Iran Conflict 2026
3SEP

Ghalibaf: hungry Iran will not endure

2 min read
16:40UTC

Iran's parliamentary Speaker told a Baghdad business meeting that military power counts for nothing if the population is hungry. Hardliners turned on him within a day, not for being wrong but for saying it abroad.

ConflictDeveloping
Key takeaway

Tehran's leadership is arguing about disclosure of the economic damage, not about the damage itself.

Mohammad Bagher Ghalibaf, Speaker of the Majlis, Iran's parliament, told a business meeting in Baghdad on Thursday 20 August that no matter how much military power Iran holds, it will not endure if its people are hungry 12. Ghalibaf has sat close to the ceasefire negotiations with Washington, which makes him an unusual source for a concession of this kind, and he made it in a neighbouring capital rather than at home.

Hardliners turned on him within a day. A former state television presenter accused him on X of sending a message of weakness 3. In Iran's factional politics, conceding economic distress in a foreign capital reads as a bargaining weakness to those who reject negotiation with Washington, whatever the state's own statistics office publishes 4.

Four days earlier the same man had told parliament's security commission that Iran had won the war . Nobody in the exchange contests the underlying figures, which Iran's government publishes itself. What is being fought over is the audience: whether a senior official may say out loud, in Baghdad, that the war has reached the household budget. A Speaker who has justified the point in public cannot easily vote down a food coupon expansion built on it, which is why the backlash arrived so fast.

Deep Analysis

In plain English

Mohammad Bagher Ghalibaf is the Speaker of Iran's parliament, its most senior elected official after the presidency. He told a business meeting in Iraq that Iran's people are going hungry and that military strength alone cannot fix that. Hardliners in Iran, who oppose talks with Washington, accused him of making Iran look weak by admitting the problem abroad. The row shows how even naming a food shortage has become politically dangerous inside Iran.

Deep Analysis
Root Causes

Iran's factional system ties economic candour to the unresolved question of who controls negotiating authority with Washington. Figures who concede hardship abroad are read by hardliners as legitimising talks Iran ruled out extending only days earlier .

Ghalibaf's position as Speaker, rather than an economic minister, adds a separate structural problem: he holds no portfolio to answer for the shortage he named, so hardliners can attack the messenger without rebutting a policy.

What could happen next?
  • Risk

    Public hunger warnings from senior officials give hardliners a recurring pretext to challenge anyone seen as softening Iran's negotiating position.

First Reported In

Update #174 · A $22.9bn missile order, and a hunger row

Iran International· 23 Aug 2026
Read original
Causes and effects
This Event
Ghalibaf: hungry Iran will not endure
The argument inside Tehran is over whether an official may admit the economic damage, not over whether it is real.
Different Perspectives
China's foreign ministry
China's foreign ministry
Spokesman Lin Jian rejected Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent's 25 August warning that Iranian oil buyers face an "economic D-Day", saying sanctions do not help and that Beijing would safeguard its own rights and interests. China's Iranian crude imports had already halved for unrelated reasons.
Iraq's government and Erbil authorities
Iraq's government and Erbil authorities
Erbil authorities said 10 explosive-laden drones were shot down over the city on 1-2 September with no casualties. Iraq's government condemned the attacks without naming Iran as their source, and neither Washington nor Baghdad confirmed the IRGC's claim to have hit US bases there.
Bahrain Defence Force
Bahrain Defence Force
The General Command said air defences intercepted several Iranian missiles and drones on 1-2 September and called the use of such weapons against civilians and private property a flagrant violation of international humanitarian law.
Kuwait's Fire Force and foreign ministry
Kuwait's Fire Force and foreign ministry
KUNA reported a hostile Iranian drone struck a residential complex in Kuwait City on 2 September; Fire Force spokesman Brigadier General Mohammad Al-Gharib said losses were confined to property. Kuwait's foreign ministry called the attack a clear breach of its sovereignty.
Jordan's Armed Forces
Jordan's Armed Forces
Petra carried a statement that air defences intercepted eight missiles violating Jordanian airspace early on 31 August and 10 of 13 fired on 1 September. The statement named no target and did not address the IRGC's claim to have struck Camp Titin and killed US personnel.
CENTCOM
CENTCOM
CENTCOM's 1 September target list named IRGC air defence, radar, maritime and mine-laying sites in Iran but no tanker, after Axios reported anonymous officials describing a Trump-approved "tanker for tanker" drone policy. A CENTCOM spokesman declined to confirm the policy and referred questions to policymakers.