Skip to content
You can now search across every topic, entity and event.What's new
Iran Conflict 2026
17AUG

Brent closes $107.05 into Beijing summit

3 min read
15:37UTC

Brent crude closed $107.77 on 12 May on Trump's verbal rejection of Iran's 10-point MOU reply via Pakistan, then settled at $107.05 on 13 May. Goldman Sachs and Morgan Stanley flagged a structural Hormuz premium that will outlast any ceasefire.

ConflictDeveloping
Key takeaway

Brent closed $107.05 on 13 May, $2.84 above the 11 May ceasefire-alive baseline.

Brent Crude closed at $107.77 on 12 May 2026, a 3.4 per cent jump on Trump's verbal rejection of Iran's 10-point MOU reply via Pakistan , then settled at $107.05 on 13 May 1. That is $2.84 above the $104.21 close that priced the ceasefire as still alive . The verbal rejection had no signed instrument behind it; the price still moved as if one had been signed against the ceasefire.

Brent is the global oil benchmark; roughly two-thirds of internationally traded crude prices off it, as do European retail diesel and the wholesale gas contracts that feed UK household bills. For UK drivers that translates to a pump price around £1.55 per litre through summer; for UK consumers on index-linked tariffs it adds roughly £180 a year to a typical household gas bill via the wholesale contracts that price off Brent. Traders are pricing both Trump's 11 May "life support" remarks on the ceasefire and the OFAC Hong Kong designations two days later .

Goldman Sachs and Morgan Stanley both noted on 13 May that the structural Hormuz premium will persist beyond any ceasefire because P&I (Protection and Indemnity) insurers cannot reopen war-risk cover for the strait until written rules of engagement exist for the European mission and the US blockade. The insurance freeze, not summit hope, sets the floor for Brent through the rest of May. The market is pricing the absence of signed paper for the rest of May.

Deep Analysis

In plain English

The price of oil on world markets is tracked via a benchmark called Brent crude. When Brent goes up, everything that uses oil, including petrol, diesel, home heating, and many food products, tends to get more expensive too. Brent closed at $107.05 on 13 May. Before the Iran conflict began about 75 days ago, it was around $67. That $40 difference is being called the "Hormuz premium", the extra cost the market adds because nobody can get war-risk insurance to ship oil through the strait right now. Two big investment banks, Goldman Sachs and Morgan Stanley, said on 13 May that this premium will not go away just because a ceasefire is signed. The shipping insurance industry needs to see written rules about how the strait will be managed before they will insure tankers again. Until that paperwork exists, oil stays expensive.

What could happen next?
  • Consequence

    The two-layer Brent premium, kinetic and structural insurance, means a signed ceasefire alone will not restore pre-war pump prices; the insurance layer requires a separate written rules-of-engagement document from the European coalition.

  • Risk

    UK Q3 2026 Ofgem price-cap calculations will incorporate the current Brent forward curve, locking elevated household energy costs through September 2026 regardless of any ceasefire signed in May or June.

First Reported In

Update #96 · Hegseth: no AUMF needed. Trump flies east

CNBC· 13 May 2026
Read original
Different Perspectives
Shipping and insurance underwriters
Shipping and insurance underwriters
Kpler counted five Hormuz transits on 16 August against 31 the previous weekend, while Windward logged four vessels going AIS-dark for up to a month; underwriters price both the attacks and a sanctions register that names their counterparties in unreadable scanned images. Two trackers now measure only the ships that consent to be seen.
China
China
China sits at the end of the payment chain the 14 August designation targets: Iran's shadow banking network exists to convert sanctioned oil sales, much of it to Chinese refiners, into usable funds. Beijing has previously refused to recognise OFAC's jurisdiction over its own entities buying Iranian crude, leaving this designation to test compliance rather than change trade.
Qatar
Qatar
Qatar's foreign ministry denied on 16 August holding any Iranian pilots alive, contradicting Iranian General Mohammad Bagherzadeh's claim that Doha holds three Su-24 aircrew, and said it had recovered only one set of remains. Qatar carries Iran's messages to Washington, and this is a public break with Tehran over a fact only one aircrew inquiry can settle.
Oman
Oman
Oman's shipping-map talks, covering monitoring, environment and maritime services, were publicly decoupled from any Hormuz reopening by Iran's own foreign minister on 17 August. Muscat's mediation channel keeps functioning on the narrow file it was given, while the political decision it hoped to unlock stays with Iran's security council.
Saudi Arabia
Saudi Arabia
Saudi Arabia separately called the recurrence of tanker attacks on Emirati shipping a dangerous escalation, breaking from the UAE's repeated formula. Riyadh speaking in its own name over an attack on another state's vessels signals it reads the pattern differently from Abu Dhabi's flat statements.
United Arab Emirates
United Arab Emirates
The UAE foreign ministry condemned a third ADNOC-linked tanker attack on 15 August in language identical, word for word, to its statement the day before. Three consecutive strikes on Emirati shipping have not moved Abu Dhabi's public wording by a single adjective.