Skip to content
You can now search across every topic, entity and event.What's new
Iran Conflict 2026
12AUG

Trump says talks, Tehran says none

3 min read
14:52UTC

Washington's action record since 26 July runs to two items: the bombing pause held, and a casualty category was renamed. Trump told Axios the US is in deep conversations with Iran; Tehran's foreign ministry says there are none.

ConflictDeveloping
Key takeaway

The bombing pause and a renamed database field are Washington's whole action record since 26 July.

The bombing pause that followed Gen Dan Caine's munitions warning to the President held through Tuesday 28 July , and the Pentagon renamed the category under which it logs Iran war casualties on 26 July. Those are the two things Washington did since 26 July1.

What Washington said covered more ground. Donald Trump told Axios the United States is "engaged in deep conversations with Iran", and told a Michigan rally of the same government: "You cannot bribe them. You must defeat them, and we will defeat them decisively"2. Iranian foreign ministry spokesman Esmaeil Baghaei said Iran is conducting no negotiations with the United States, allowing only that mediators may be relaying messages3.

Tehran and Washington ran this exchange once already. Parliamentary speaker Mohammad Bagher Ghalibaf issued a categorical denial of talks on 23 March, calling Trump's claims an attempt to "manipulate markets and escape the quagmire", while a senior foreign ministry official told CBS News that US points had arrived through mediators and were being reviewed . Baghaei himself drew the same distinction then that he draws now, between direct negotiation and relayed messages. The Islamic Republic's political system requires that engagement with Washington look imposed rather than sought, which makes the public denial a fixed feature rather than a signal about what is happening in Muscat or Islamabad.

Al Jazeera's account also has US officials telling Reuters that available target sets were depleting, a reading Trump disputed to ABC News4. Read against the actions rather than the words, the pause and the recategorisation point the same way: one buys operational time while munitions stocks recover, the other buys legal time on the War Powers clock. Talks that one party denies are still talks the other can take credit for, and the pause runs on either way.

Deep Analysis

In plain English

President Trump told Axios the United States is in deep conversations with Iran. The same day, an Iranian government spokesman said Iran is not negotiating with the US at all, only allowing that go-betweens might be passing messages back and forth. Meanwhile Washington's actual actions have stayed the same as before: the bombing pause held and a casualty database category got renamed, nothing bigger. Separately, unnamed US officials reportedly told Reuters that the list of Iranian targets left to strike is shrinking, something Trump disputes.

What could happen next?
  • Meaning

    A gap between what Trump describes as deep conversations and Tehran's flat denial suggests any real contact, if it exists, is running through intermediaries neither government will confirm.

First Reported In

Update #163 · Pentagon puts four dead back, renames war

Al Jazeera Arabic· 28 Jul 2026
Read original
Causes and effects
Different Perspectives
Anwar Gargash, UAE presidential diplomatic adviser
Anwar Gargash, UAE presidential diplomatic adviser
Gargash warned the region cannot stay trapped between "neither war nor peace", naming the stalemate itself as unsustainable for a Gulf state hosting US forces and absorbing the shipping-risk cost without being party to either the strike decisions or the corridor talks.
Shipping and insurance underwriters
Shipping and insurance underwriters
War-risk premiums are still set against an active blockade and a fatal Bab el-Mandeb attack with an unresolved vessel identity. A disabling strike and a diplomatic "advanced" claim pulling in opposite directions gives underwriters no single signal to reprice cover against.
Pakistan and Qatar (Oman corridor mediators)
Pakistan and Qatar (Oman corridor mediators)
Pakistan's defence minister said matters are "shaping up in favor of peace" on Hormuz and a Qatari spokesperson called the Iran-Oman reopening talks advanced. Both are publicly ahead of Tehran's own security council, which has just disowned the deal's significance.
United States Central Command / President Trump
United States Central Command / President Trump
CENTCOM confirmed a helicopter strike disabled a container ship that tried to evade the blockade, and Trump said the US "totally controls" the Strait of Hormuz. Washington is treating evasion of the blockade as grounds for disabling fire rather than the redirection tactic CENTCOM used through July.
Mohsen Rezaei, Iran's Supreme National Security Council
Mohsen Rezaei, Iran's Supreme National Security Council
Rezaei told China's ambassador Hormuz reopens only when the US ends the war and unblocks Iran's funds, and that the Oman transit deal "will have no impact" on that decision. He is drawing a hard line between the technical corridor track and the political settlement his council controls.
Yemen's internationally recognised government and affected communities
Yemen's internationally recognised government and affected communities
SABA reported at least 17 soldiers killed at Saudi-backed camps in eastern Yemen as tanker use of Bab el-Mandeb fell. The fighting adds civilian and supply risks to a route ships use when Hormuz is unsafe.