Skip to content
You can now search across every topic, entity and event.What's new
Iran Conflict 2026
16JUN

Brent hits two-month low on deal bets

3 min read
10:20UTC

Brent crude traded near $87.33 on 12 June, a near-two-month low, as futures markets priced roughly an 80 per cent chance the Iran deal closes.

ConflictDeveloping
Key takeaway

Traders priced an 80 per cent chance of an unsigned deal, leaving Brent exposed to a sharp rebound.

Brent Crude, the global oil benchmark, traded near $87.33 on 12 June, a near-two-month low and down about 6 per cent on the week, even as the White House register the market is betting on showed no signature. 1 Futures traders are pricing roughly an 80 per cent chance the Iran deal closes, a senior US official's figure, which means they are discounting the unsigned register almost entirely. 2

The fall was a step-down, not a slide: $96.34 on 10 June , $94.71 on 11 June , $89.25 on 12 June , now below $88. In three sessions the benchmark gave back the entire high it set on Hormuz risk. Traders, not diplomats, are the most confident actors that a deal they cannot see will close, discounting the blockade, the drone combat and the IRGC's review hedge on a bet that Hormuz reopens soon.

The confidence cuts one way. A near-two-month low feeds through to softer fuel and freight costs for importers within weeks if the move holds. But with 80 per cent already in the price, the market holds little cushion: a Vahidi re-suspension or a slipped signing would reprice Hormuz risk sharply and snap Brent back above $90, because the good news has been spent before the paper exists.

Deep Analysis

In plain English

Oil is priced on expectations as much as on actual supply. When traders think a conflict that has been disrupting Middle East oil supply is close to ending, the price falls before a single extra barrel flows. On 12 June, with news of a possible deal circulating, the price of Brent crude, the main global oil benchmark, fell to around $87.33, its lowest in nearly two months. Markets were pricing in about an 80 per cent chance the deal would close and the Strait of Hormuz would reopen. But that calculation rests on an unsigned document and unresolved disagreements: where Iran's enriched uranium goes and whether Iran's most powerful military force, the IRGC, has agreed to the deal at all. If those problems cause a delay, the price will jump back up sharply.

What could happen next?
  • Risk

    Brent near $87.33 on an unsigned deal means a single negative signal, a Vahidi re-suspension or a public IRGC contradiction, would produce a $5-$8 upward snap in one trading session.

    Immediate · Assessed
  • Opportunity

    If Hormuz fully reopens and Iran's 67 million stranded barrels clear, Brent could settle in the $80-$83 band within six to eight weeks, reducing fuel and freight inflation across oil-importing economies.

    Medium term · Suggested
  • Consequence

    Lloyd's of London has not de-listed Hormuz from its war-risk register despite the price drop; insurance premiums remain elevated and shipping diversions at 139 vessels continue regardless of futures pricing.

    Short term · Reported
First Reported In

Update #126 · The weekend signing that never reached paper

oilprice.com· 13 Jun 2026
Read original
Different Perspectives
G7 Leaders (ex-US)
G7 Leaders (ex-US)
Kananaskis ended without a joint communique for the first time in the body's history; Macron credited G7 pressure with speeding the ceasefire while Trump publicly denied the summit played any role. The split between US and European G7 partners over what the memorandum means for sanctions relief was the direct cause of the text failure.
Protection-and-Indemnity insurers
Protection-and-Indemnity insurers
London-based P&I mutual clubs declined to underwrite Hormuz crossings while the IRGC Strait Authority remained operational, making the passage commercially impassable regardless of the memorandum's terms. Shipping operators said they would wait weeks for on-water conditions to change before routing tankers through.
IRGC Persian Gulf Strait Authority
IRGC Persian Gulf Strait Authority
P&I mutual insurers declined to underwrite Hormuz crossings on 15-16 June while the IRGC's Strait Authority remained in operation, reducing actual transits to two vessels against a pre-war daily rate of 94. The corps' revenue-generating toll mechanism, created 5 May and collecting $1.5-2 million per VLCC in crypto, has not been stood down and cannot be dissolved by Ghalibaf's signature.
Israeli Cabinet
Israeli Cabinet
Netanyahu admitted he had not seen the memorandum's text but confirmed IDF forces would stay in southern Lebanon; Finance Minister Smotrich called for ten Beirut buildings destroyed per Hezbollah drone and National Security Minister Ben-Gvir said the agreement 'does not bind us in any way'. Israel signed nothing in Islamabad and is the central unresolved variable in the Lebanon clause.
Iranian Majlis hardliners
Iranian Majlis hardliners
Around 60 MPs signed a letter demanding Ghalibaf explain the memorandum; Paydari faction MP Sabeti said the deal violates the Supreme Leader's red lines, and MP Aboutorabi argued the document carries binding obligations 'that cannot be resolved by simply changing the name'. President Pezeshkian defended the negotiators against accusations of betrayal, confirming the fracture inside Iran's political class.
US Vice President JD Vance
US Vice President JD Vance
Vance signed on 15 June and said the memorandum was 'not conditioned on Israel withdrawing from Lebanon' while also saying it 'envisioned a ceasefire that covers both Iran and Lebanon'. The two formulations are incompatible and hand Iran's foreign minister a ready-made violation claim before Geneva.