Skip to content
You can now search across every topic, entity and event.What's new
Iran Conflict 2026
11JUN

Oil swings $30 in a single session

2 min read
09:17UTC

Brent hit $119.50 — the highest since 2012 — then crashed below $90 on a single presidential comment. The most volatile crude session in decades reveals a market trading on words, not barrels.

ConflictDeveloping

Brent Crude hit $119.50 per barrel on Monday morning — the highest since 2022 and a 77% rise from $67.41 on 27 February, the day the war began. WTI reached $119.48. By the US close, Brent had settled at $98.96, sinking below $90 in after-hours trading. WTI settled at $94.77. The $30 intraday reversal was driven by Trump's 'very soon' language on ending the war and profit-taking on overcrowded long positions.

The $30 swing dwarfs normal oil market volatility. Brent's average daily range through 2025 was approximately $2. Even during the 2020 pandemic price collapse, intraday moves rarely exceeded $10. Last Friday, US crude futures posted a 35.63% weekly gain — the largest since the contract began trading in 1983 . Qatar's energy minister warned of $150 per barrel if Hormuz remains closed . The market touched $119 and flinched — but the flinch was triggered by a presidential remark, not by any change in the physical supply picture. Brent had been at $116.08 just three days ago , itself a 72% rise in under two weeks. The 1990 Iraqi invasion of Kuwait doubled oil prices over two months; this war achieved the same effect in ten days and then gave back a third of it in an afternoon.

The underlying supply disruption has not changed. Tanker traffic through Hormuz remains down approximately 70%. Kuwait's force majeure removed 300,000 barrels per day from export markets. Combined with Iraq's curtailments of approximately 1.5 million barrels per day, roughly 3.5 million barrels per day of Gulf production capacity is shut in or unable to reach market. No tanker insurance has been restored. No diplomatic off-ramp for Hormuz has materialised. The fundamental imbalance — supply removed, demand unchanged — is identical to what it was at $119 in the morning. What moved was sentiment, and sentiment moved on words.

The question for Tuesday's Asian open is whether $90 or $100 becomes the new floor. If $90 holds, the oil shock remains a market event — painful but absorbable for import-dependent economies, even those already strained (South Korea's KOSPI triggered two circuit breakers in four sessions, . If $100 holds, it crosses into macroeconomic damage: compressed industrial margins, inflationary pressure on food and transport costs across Asia and Europe, and political pressure on governments to release strategic petroleum reserves or seek bilateral supply deals outside The Gulf. The market is not pricing oil. It is pricing the probability that one man's 'very soon' means what it says.

First Reported In

Update #31 · Iran moves to heavy warheads; China deploys

Euronews· 10 Mar 2026
Read original
Different Perspectives
Oil markets and Lloyd's of London
Oil markets and Lloyd's of London
Brent fell to $89.25 on ceasefire probability, not new barrels, with traders voting for Trump's deed over Tehran's denial. Lloyd's has not repriced Hormuz war-risk cover because its trigger requires a UN Security Council resolution or government certification, so tanker insurance costs remain elevated regardless of the spot move.
Pakistan and Qatar mediators
Pakistan and Qatar mediators
Pakistan's Mohsin Naqvi was in Tehran for his second visit in under a week, using the Pakistan-Qatar channel that delivered April's ceasefire after an identical public-denial cycle. The channel carries both civilian and military buy-in from Islamabad, the only configuration Iran's split command cannot dismiss as a partial signal.
India
India
India summoned the US Deputy Chief of Mission after three Indian sailors were killed aboard MT Settebello, the first formal grievance from a major non-belligerent directed at US enforcement. Indian seafarers supply roughly 12 per cent of the global maritime workforce; their presence on third-flag Gulf tankers is structurally inevitable regardless of bilateral diplomacy.
Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC)
Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC)
The IRGC declared Hormuz closed on 11 June while civilian negotiators were on the same mediation channel, then issued no public comment on the MoU framework. Its silence on the framework, rather than any foreign ministry statement, is the operative approval signal; the corps' unilateral Hormuz closure shows it did not treat the diplomatic track as binding on its operations.
Iran foreign ministry (Baghaei)
Iran foreign ministry (Baghaei)
Esmail Baghaei told IRNA that reports of a finalised deal were 'merely speculation' and that Iran had 'not yet made a final decision'. The denial is structurally identical to Iranian foreign ministry statements during the April ceasefire talks, which produced a binding text within 48 hours of the same language.
Trump administration / CENTCOM
Trump administration / CENTCOM
Trump cancelled the third strike day and called the MoU 'very strong' and almost ready to sign, while CENTCOM kept tanker enforcement running in the same 24-hour window. The administration is simultaneously withdrawing the military pressure it claims drove the deal and sustaining the enforcement campaign it is trying to trade away.