Skip to content
Briefings are running a touch slower this week while we rebuild the foundations.See roadmap
Iran Conflict 2026
24MAY

Missile hits Bahrain BAPCO refinery

3 min read
14:49UTC

An Iranian ballistic missile struck BAPCO's Sitra refinery — Bahrain's primary refining operation — in the first confirmed attack on Gulf energy infrastructure since the conflict began.

ConflictDeveloping
Key takeaway

Targeting BAPCO on Sitra Island — the same island hosting the US Fifth Fleet headquarters — signals Iran is deliberately striking US-allied economic assets within direct range of America's primary Gulf command node, a qualitative shift in targeting geography.

An Iranian Ballistic missile struck the BAPCO Energies refinery at Sitra, Bahrain on Thursday — the first confirmed Iranian strike on Gulf energy infrastructure in this conflict. A fire started and was reported "contained." One hotel and two residential buildings were also hit. Bahraini authorities reported no casualties.

BAPCO is Bahrain's primary refining operation. The official language — "limited material damage," "contained" fire — does not address the operational question. Refineries that process flammable hydrocarbons at high temperature and pressure do not resume operations after a Ballistic missile strike without comprehensive safety inspections, a process that typically requires days. Whether BAPCO is currently producing refined product is unknown.

Bahrain has now absorbed 75 missiles and 123 drones since 28 February . The island — 780 square kilometres, roughly the area of New York City — hosts the US Fifth Fleet headquarters, where satellite imagery already confirmed several buildings destroyed and two AN/GSC-52B satellite communications terminals knocked out . The BAPCO strike extends Iranian targeting from the military infrastructure hosting American forces to the civilian energy infrastructure sustaining the Bahraini economy.

The distinction matters for Iran's strategic messaging. Striking the Fifth Fleet headquarters can be framed as self-defence against the force prosecuting the war. Striking a civilian refinery, a hotel, and residential buildings cannot. If Iran's Decentralised Mosaic Defence doctrine has devolved targeting authority to 31 provincial commanders , the question is whether the BAPCO strike reflects central strategic direction or an autonomous decision by a regional unit — and whether Tehran retains the ability to control that distinction.

Deep Analysis

In plain English

Iran fired a ballistic missile at Bahrain's main oil refinery. The refinery processes nearly all of Bahrain's oil exports and sits on the same island as the US Navy's Gulf headquarters. Even if the fire is contained, refineries that process flammable fuels must pass safety inspections before restarting after a missile strike — a process that takes days minimum. Bahrain is a small island nation that depends on oil revenue for roughly three-quarters of government spending, so even a short shutdown has a meaningful fiscal impact. The strike on a hotel and residential buildings in the same attack package suggests Iran is also trying to pressure Bahraini civilians, not just military and energy targets.

Deep Analysis
Synthesis

The targeting logic — energy infrastructure plus civilian structures in a single package — matches the pattern Iran used against Saudi Arabia in 2019 and mirrors classic coercive bombing theory: imposing economic and psychological costs on a host-nation population to erode domestic support for basing rights. Applied to Bahrain, a state of 1.5 million people with limited strategic depth, this coercive calculus is structurally more viable than against larger states, making Bahrain the most likely testing ground for whether civilian economic pressure can detach a Gulf host from US basing arrangements.

Escalation

Simultaneously targeting a refinery, a hotel, and residential buildings in a single strike package represents a qualitative escalation in Bahrain targeting: Iran is no longer restricting strikes to military and government infrastructure, introducing a civilian coercion dimension distinct from the cumulative quantity metrics already noted in the body.

What could happen next?
  • Consequence

    Mandatory post-strike safety inspections will take the refinery offline for days regardless of physical damage severity, reducing Bahrain's export revenue and potentially requiring emergency Saudi fuel supply arrangements.

    Immediate · Assessed
  • Risk

    Repeated strikes on BAPCO could force Bahrain into deeper economic dependence on Riyadh at a moment when Saudi Arabia is navigating its own neutrality, giving Riyadh leverage over Bahraini basing policy decisions.

    Short term · Suggested
  • Precedent

    The first confirmed Iranian strike on Bahraini energy infrastructure lowers the implicit threshold for future targeting of Gulf state civilian economic assets, signalling other host nations that basing rights carry direct economic costs.

    Short term · Assessed
First Reported In

Update #23 · Iran loses half its navy; China eyes Hormuz

Al Jazeera· 6 Mar 2026
Read original
Causes and effects
This Event
Missile hits Bahrain BAPCO refinery
Iran's targeting has expanded from military installations hosting US forces to civilian energy infrastructure sustaining the Bahraini economy. Whether the strike reflects central strategic direction or autonomous decision-making under Iran's decentralised command doctrine is an open question with implications for escalation control.
Different Perspectives
Lloyd's of London
Lloyd's of London
The Joint War Committee left Hormuz war-risk premiums at $10-14 million per voyage on 25 May, declining to move on Brent's 5% fall. The JWC's protocol requires a UN Security Council resolution or bilateral government certification letter before de-listing, and neither has arrived: a verbal understanding does not satisfy the formal condition the reinsurance market's treaty terms require.
Gulf Arab producers
Gulf Arab producers
Saudi Arabia and UAE depend on Hormuz for their own crude exports; Aramco CEO Nasser has warned no oil market recovery arrives until 2027 if the blockade continues past mid-June. Monday's $98.96 Brent settlement shortens nothing for Gulf producers without a signed instrument and a Pentagon mine-clearance timeline that runs up to six months post-ceasefire.
Qatar
Qatar
Qatar holds $12bn of frozen Iranian assets at the centre of the sequencing dispute but cannot release them without explicit US Treasury authorisation, given the original freeze was a US instrument. As the asset-holding state, Qatar's leverage is real but passive: it is the escrow holder, not the decision-maker, and any resolution requires US Treasury sign-off that Trump has withheld.
Pakistan
Pakistan
With both Prime Minister Sharif and army chief Munir simultaneously in Beijing on 25 May, Pakistan has for the first time consolidated its civilian and military mediation tracks under China's roof. Munir's direct Tehran-to-Beijing flight signals that the security and financial threads of the sequencing problem are now being worked in parallel rather than sequentially.
China
China
Beijing hosted Pakistan's principal mediators and Iran's China envoy Ghalibaf simultaneously on 25 May while its banking regulator capped new state-bank lending to five sanctioned refiners. China is simultaneously the most credible third-party underwriter of the $12bn sequencing and the state whose institutions face live OFAC secondary-sanctions exposure if the deadlock persists through GL V's expiry.
United States
United States
Trump posted on 24 May that the blockade holds until a deal is certified and signed, ruling out the informal MOU structure both sides had been building. The 'certified, and signed' condition is the first operational bar Trump has attached in 87 days, but it arrived without an executive instrument, maintaining the gap between posted ultimatum and signed US policy.