Skip to content
You can now search across every topic, entity and event.What's new
European Tech Sovereignty
26JUL

Assembly schedules vote for Mojtaba

3 min read
10:21UTC

The Assembly of Experts moved its emergency session to announce Mojtaba Khamenei to a website and a shrine — after Israel destroyed the building where it last voted.

TechnologyDeveloping
Key takeaway

Conducting the succession online from a shrine rather than in a formal institutional venue confirms that Israeli targeting has partially achieved its strategic objective of disrupting the succession process, even if it has not halted it.

Iran International reported that the Assembly of Experts scheduled an emergency online session for 5 March to formally announce Mojtaba Khamenei as Supreme Leader, accelerating from the "next week" timeline reported earlier Wednesday. The session is being held from a location near the Fatima Masumeh shrine in Qom — one of Shia Islam's holiest sites, chosen to lend religious gravity to a succession that lacks it on clerical terms, and because Israel struck the Assembly's Qom headquarters during the succession vote earlier this week , killing or wounding multiple members.

The Assembly had already confirmed Mojtaba as successor , but that vote occurred under contested circumstances. Whether it took place before the Israeli strike on the headquarters, in its aftermath, or in a dispersed emergency session remains unclear and cannot be independently verified during Iran's internet blackout, now in its sixth day . Iranian state media described the selection as "divine will." The formal announcement session is intended to provide the public legitimacy that the initial vote, conducted under fire, could not deliver.

At least eight Assembly members plan to boycott, citing "heavy pressure" from the IRGC. Their objection is substantive: Mojtaba, 56, does not hold marja ("source of emulation") status — the highest rank in Shia clerical hierarchy. Article 109 of the Islamic Republic's constitution requires The Supreme Leader to possess senior jurisprudential scholarship. His father faced a similar objection when elevated from hojatoleslam in 1989; the clerical establishment resolved it by retroactively upgrading Khamenei's rank, a manoeuvre critics called political rather than scholarly. Mojtaba's credentials are thinner still. His power base is the IRGC and Basij, not the seminaries of Qom.

The earlier plan to delay the announcement — linked to postponement of Ali Khamenei's burial and security concerns about any public ceremony presenting a targeting opportunity — has been overridden. The IRGC's calculation appears to be that a state at war without a formally announced head of state is more vulnerable than one with a contested leader. Iran has now restructured its military into 31 autonomous commands and is attempting to formalise its supreme political authority — both under active bombardment, both improvised responses to Israeli strikes designed to decapitate the chain of command. From exile, Reza Pahlavi — the late Shah's son — stated that whoever is announced "will lack legitimacy and will be considered an accomplice to the bloody record" of the Islamic Republic, a framing aimed at the internal Iranian audience the internet blackout is designed to isolate.

Deep Analysis

In plain English

Iran is choosing its most powerful leader — the Supreme Leader sits above the president and controls the military, judiciary, and state media — but instead of a formal ceremony in their parliament building (which was bombed), they are doing it online from near a holy site, rushed to prevent further attacks. The person being chosen (Mojtaba Khamenei) is the current leader's son, which is politically awkward in a system that claims to reject dynastic rule and requires the leader to be a qualified Islamic scholar — a qualification he is widely considered to lack.

Deep Analysis
Synthesis

The dispersed, covert session reveals that Israel's targeting strategy has achieved a secondary effect the body does not articulate: it has transformed Iran's most consequential institutional act into an underground process, reducing its religious and procedural defensibility precisely when maximum legitimacy is needed to govern through a wartime crisis.

Root Causes

Iran's constitution requires the Supreme Leader to be a qualified Islamic jurist (faqih); Mojtaba lacks this standing. The IRGC's willingness to coerce the Assembly reflects a decade-long structural shift in which the Guards' economic interests — estimated at 20–30% of Iran's GDP through affiliated conglomerates — have made them the dominant institutional power, with the theological rationale for the system increasingly subordinate to their security calculus.

Escalation

The acceleration signals the IRGC and regime inner circle want Mojtaba formally installed before either a ceasefire negotiation or continued military pressure removes their ability to control the outcome — suggesting the regime expects the conflict to continue long enough to make the succession a live variable in any talks.

What could happen next?
  • Consequence

    A Supreme Leader installed through a coerced, boycotted, digitally-conducted session will face persistent internal legitimacy challenges that make governance dependent on IRGC enforcement rather than clerical authority.

    Medium term · Assessed
  • Precedent

    Conducting a constitutional process online under targeting pressure establishes that Iranian state institutions can be physically dispersed and degraded by external military action — a capability demonstration that will inform future Israeli and US targeting doctrine.

    Long term · Suggested
  • Risk

    A legitimacy-challenged new Supreme Leader may pursue aggressive military postures in the short term to consolidate authority and demonstrate strength to the IRGC constituency that installed him.

    Short term · Suggested
First Reported In

Update #22 · IRGC drones hit Azerbaijan; CIA link cut

Iran International· 5 Mar 2026
Read original
Causes and effects
This Event
Assembly schedules vote for Mojtaba
The acceleration of Mojtaba's formal announcement — conducted online, relocated for security, and facing an eight-member boycott — reflects the IRGC's judgement that establishing leadership continuity during active bombardment outweighs the legitimacy costs of a contested, hurried process.
Different Perspectives
China's Ministry of Commerce
China's Ministry of Commerce
Spokesperson He Yadong said on 16 July that Beijing and the Netherlands should let firms settle the Nexperia dispute through consultation, after a Dutch ministerial visit to Beijing. The conciliatory tone contrasts with the confrontational US trade response to the same fortnight's DMA enforcement.
Samsung Electronics
Samsung Electronics
Samsung entered talks reported 22 July to invest up to €1 billion in Mistral AI, part of a round valuing the French lab at roughly €20 billion alongside EQT, Novo Holdings and Santander. The Korean conglomerate, not an EU financing instrument, is positioned to anchor Europe's flagship AI lab.
Poland (Tusk government)
Poland (Tusk government)
Donald Tusk's government proposed a mandatory sovereignty test on 21 July for state technology contracts above 5 million zloty, scoring bids on AI model-weight rights and vendor lock-in rather than waiting for an EU-wide procurement rule. The threshold targets a 20-30 per cent domestic-alternative share.
United States administration
United States administration
Donald Trump ordered a Section 301 investigation into EU digital-enforcement practices on 24 July, a day after USTR's Jamieson Greer said the Google fine created massive uncertainty for US exports, noting Google's cumulative EU fines already exceed 2 per cent of the bloc's budget.
Ecosia
Ecosia
Ecosia said the 16 July FRAND ranking-data order would take it from answering two-thirds of queries to all of them once the obligation activates in January 2027. The Berlin-based challenger has not called the enforcement package adequate, only workable if Google complies rather than appeals.
European Commission
European Commission
Teresa Ribera and Henna Virkkunen announced the €890m fine on 23 July, saying products should succeed on merit, not platform ownership; four days earlier a separate Article 6(7) order compelled Android interoperability. The Commission expects both to hold on appeal after the Court of Justice upheld its earlier €4.1bn Android fine on 2 July.