Skip to content
You can now search across every topic, entity and event.What's new
European Oil Markets
31JUL

Gulf jets struck Iran, WSJ reports

2 min read
09:33UTC

The Wall Street Journal says Bahraini and Kuwaiti fighter jets bombed weapons depots inside Iran earlier this month, with Emirati intelligence and air cover behind them. Manama and Kuwait City will not comment.

← Back to Insurers shut Bab el-Mandeb to Saudi hullsJump to analysis ↓
EconomicDeveloping
Key takeaway

Two Gulf states that had only been targets are now reported to have bombed Iran themselves.

The Wall Street Journal reported on 24 July that Bahrain and Kuwait sent fighter jets against drone and missile storage depots inside Iran earlier this month, citing officials familiar with the operation 1. The United Arab Emirates (UAE) supplied intelligence and defensive air cover but flew no strikes of its own, the same report said 2. Neither Bahraini nor Kuwaiti spokespeople would comment when asked. The sorties themselves are undated beyond that window; only the Journal's account carries the 24 July stamp.

Bahrain is a Gulf island kingdom hosting the US Fifth Fleet; Kuwait sits at the head of the Gulf and holds American air assets at Ali Al Salem. Both have appeared in this war so far on the receiving end. Bahrain said it thwarted Iranian missiles and drones on 19 July , and Kuwait counted a fourth day of attacks on its power and desalination stations by 21 July . Flying into Iranian airspace is a different act from intercepting what comes the other way.

The Journal characterises the depot raids as the first direct retaliation either state has flown against Tehran. That wording belongs to the Journal, and nobody in Manama or Kuwait City has confirmed any part of it 3. Abu Dhabi's contribution, intelligence and defensive cover without ordnance, leaves the UAE able to deny participation while still shaping the operation.

If the account holds, Tehran acquires two new addresses for retaliation, both of them hosting American basing and both within a few minutes' missile flight of the Iranian coast. If it does not hold, three governments have chosen silence over denial, and a denial would cost them nothing.

Deep Analysis

In plain English

Bahrain and Kuwait are small Gulf Arab countries that host US military bases and have spent this war on the receiving end of Iranian missile and drone attacks. The Wall Street Journal reported that, for the first time, their fighter jets struck weapons storage sites inside Iran itself earlier in July, with a third Gulf country, the United Arab Emirates, helping with intelligence and air cover but not flying any strikes itself. Neither Bahrain nor Kuwait has confirmed or denied the report. If accurate, it would mean two countries long seen as targets in this war have started fighting back directly, which could change how Iran responds to them.

Deep Analysis
Root Causes

Bahrain and Kuwait each field air forces built around single squadrons of F-16s, sized for point air defence rather than sustained offensive strike packages into hostile territory, so any deep sortie against Iranian depots would structurally require a third party to supply targeting data and top cover, a gap the UAE's larger, better-equipped air force is positioned to fill.

Both kingdoms also host forward US military infrastructure, Bahrain the Fifth Fleet and Kuwait CENTCOM's logistics hub, which gives Tehran an obvious retaliatory target set immediately offshore; that exposure is the more plausible explanation for continued official silence than any doubt about the WSJ account itself.

Escalation

Direction: upward, if confirmed. Two Gulf states previously limited to defensive interception would have crossed into offensive strikes on Iranian soil, a threshold the war has not seen from these countries before. The evidence for the shift rests entirely on WSJ sourcing that neither government will confirm, so the assessment carries the same uncertainty as the underlying report.

What could happen next?
  • Meaning

    If confirmed, Bahrain and Kuwait would be conducting offensive strikes against Iran for the first time in this war, moving beyond the interception role they have held since March.

    Immediate · Reported
  • Risk

    Confirmation of direct Gulf-state strikes could draw a retaliatory Iranian strike specifically targeting Bahraini or Kuwaiti territory rather than shared regional infrastructure.

    Short term · Suggested
  • Precedent

    A confirmed UAE intelligence and air-cover role without direct strikes would establish a template for Gulf states to support offensive action against Iran while retaining diplomatic deniability.

    Medium term · Suggested
Sources:Wall Street Journal
Mentions:Iran →US Fifth Fleet →Abu Dhabi →Wall Street Journal →Gulf War →Tehran →Doha →Emirates →Manama →Bahrain →Kuwait →United Arab Emirates (UAE) →
First Reported In

Update #161 · Bahrain and Kuwait struck Iran, WSJ reports

Wall Street Journal· 25 Jul 2026
Read original →
Causes and effects
Caused by
IRGC sets Kuwait's Shuaiba complex alight
Kuwait's shift to offensive strikes follows the IRGC's earlier attack on its Shuaiba power complex.
Occurred 17 Jul 2026
Read story →
Bahrain says it thwarted a missile wave
Bahrain's reported strikes follow its own account of thwarting Iranian missiles and drones five days earlier.
Occurred 18 Jul 2026
Read story →
This Event
Gulf jets struck Iran, WSJ reports
Two Gulf monarchies that have spent this war absorbing Iranian strikes are now reported to have flown offensive sorties into Iranian territory, which changes who Tehran can plausibly retaliate against.
Different Perspectives
Sanctions compliance officer reviewing a Lukoil International GmbH bid
Sanctions compliance officer reviewing a Lukoil International GmbH bid
OFAC's amended FAQ 1224 gives a compliance desk its first published standard: full severance from Lukoil and a US-jurisdiction blocked account for sale proceeds. The conditions name neither ISAB nor Italy, so a Priolo Gargallo-linked bid answers a different question than a Neftochim Burgas or Petrotel Ploiesti one.
Managed-money funds on Brent Last Day
Managed-money funds on Brent Last Day
CFTC data for the week to 21 July showed managed money flipping 74,400 contracts to a net long of 15,665 against 1,410 short on the Brent Last Day contract, code 06765T. A fund that held that short through July has now covered it, and the spent short base raises the bar for the next leg higher.
Saudi crude exporters
Saudi crude exporters
Saudi-linked tanker transits through Bab el-Mandeb fell to about 7.5 a day after the 24 July underwriting withdrawal, pushing more barrels onto the longer route round the Cape or through the Yanbu terminal. Every diverted barrel ties up a ship for longer, and a fleet that turns slower charges more.
Tanker owners on the Bab el-Mandeb route
Tanker owners on the Bab el-Mandeb route
Lloyd's-market syndicates withdrew war-risk cover from Saudi-linked hulls on 24 July, leaving owners of that class of vessel to sail Bab el-Mandeb uninsured or not at all. Tanker transits on the route fell to roughly 7.5 a day, and cover, once withdrawn, does not return on a shipowner's timetable.
Eni
Eni
Eni's board approved second-quarter results on 29 July, swinging refining EBIT to a EUR0.08bn profit from a year-earlier loss even as group profit doubled, and named Red Sea freight cost as a cap on that improvement. A refiner absorbing higher shipping costs on Saudi-linked crude while its numbers improve treats the freight line as a drag, not a crisis.
Asian buyers (India, Japan, China, South Korea)
Asian buyers (India, Japan, China, South Korea)
Asian refiners are absorbing 62% of Yanbu's 3.75m b/d flow, the bulk of Saudi Arabia's rerouted crude now clearing east rather than into the Atlantic basin. That destination split leaves Asian buyers more exposed to any single Yanbu-specific disruption than under the kingdom's normal multi-terminal export pattern.