Skip to content
You can now search across every topic, entity and event.What's new
Autonomous Systems: Land & Sea
29MAY

First global code for crewless ships

4 min read
08:47UTC

The IMO adopted the first global code for autonomous cargo ships on 22 May in London. It is voluntary until 2032 and keeps a human master legally on the hook from ashore.

TechnologyDeveloping
Key takeaway

Global rules for self-sailing cargo ships now exist, but stay voluntary until 2032 with a human master still liable.

The International Maritime Organization (IMO), the United Nations body that writes shipping safety rules, adopted the first code for Maritime Autonomous Surface Ships (MASS) on 22 May, closing its Maritime Safety Committee (MSC) 111 session in London. 1 A MASS is a cargo vessel that senses, decides and steers with a reduced crew or none aboard. The code enters force on 1 July 2026, applies to cargo ships only, and keeps a human master legally responsible even when that master sits in a control room ashore.

The small print blunts the milestone. The code is non-mandatory until a binding version targeted for 1 January 2032, and the years between open an Experience Building Phase in which flag states collect operational data and decide for themselves what to permit. The Experience Building Phase exists because no regulator yet holds enough crewless-voyage data to write binding rules. The gap is a data-collection device, but it also lets national regimes diverge.

Classification societies already run ahead of it. DNV and Lloyd's Register, the bodies that certify ships as safe and seaworthy, certify autonomous and remotely operated vessels under their own rules today. 2 That inverts the usual order: SOLAS safety rules normally precede the technology, whereas here the IMO is racing to catch up to commercial practice. The risk is a patchwork of national interpretations during the gap, plus a new shoreside regulated entity, the Remote Control Centre, whose liability questions the code defers rather than settles. Nautilus International, the seafarers' union, argues the master should stay aboard while any crew are present, a labour counterweight to the cost case for emptying the bridge.

The same autonomy stack that runs a crewless box ship runs a minehunter and a subsea-cable inspection drone, which is why a shipping safety code matters to a defence procurement reader.

Deep Analysis

In plain English

International rules for shipping are set by a United Nations agency called the IMO, which stands for International Maritime Organization. On 22 May the IMO agreed the first global rules for ships that operate with no crew on the bridge, or with a much smaller crew controlled from an office on land. These rules are currently voluntary: shipping companies can follow them or not. They become compulsory in 2032. The main sticking point is who is legally responsible if a crewless ship crashes or sinks. The new code says a human "master" on shore is still in charge, but seafarers' unions argue that is not safe if that person is managing several ships at once from a screen.

Deep Analysis
Root Causes

The six-year non-mandatory gap reflects a genuine institutional constraint: the IMO operates by consensus among 175 member states with widely different coastguard and port-state control capacity. Flag-of-convenience states account for the majority of global tonnage; several lack the domestic technical regulation needed to enforce a mandatory autonomous vessel standard today.

The deferred timeline also reflects classification society lobbying. DNV and Lloyd's Register have built first-mover advantage through their own autonomous vessel class notations. A fast mandatory standard risks locking in criteria that disadvantage their proprietary frameworks or force immediate retrofits on vessels they have already certified under weaker rules.

What could happen next?
  • Precedent

    The MASS Code's goal-based, deferred-mandatory model sets the template for how the IMO will regulate other emerging maritime technologies, including hydrogen-fuelled vessels and underwater data cables.

    Medium term · Suggested
  • Risk

    Flag-state divergence on remote-master liability during the 2026-2032 voluntary period creates a regulatory arbitrage window: operators may choose flags with the weakest enforcement.

    Short term · Assessed
  • Opportunity

    Classification societies with existing autonomous-vessel class notations, particularly DNV and Lloyd's Register, gain a commercial advantage as the only bodies currently issuing certificates that comply with the MASS Code's technical objectives.

    Immediate · Reported
First Reported In

Update #1 · UK's robot navy sails for Hormuz

International Maritime Organization· 29 May 2026
Read original
Different Perspectives
China (military commentary)
China (military commentary)
Chinese military commentary has called uncrewed maritime equipment 'an excellent force multiplier' that cannot overturn the fundamental logic of naval warfare, the lone voice against the Western consensus that autonomy is the central axis of naval modernisation. Beijing reads the airdrop trial as an incremental logistics fix, not London's claimed doctrinal breakthrough.
Iran (Ministry of Foreign Affairs)
Iran (Ministry of Foreign Affairs)
Spokesman Kazem Gharibabadi said clearance of the Hormuz mines is 'Iran's sole responsibility', rejecting the Omani-authorised allied mine-clearance mission as a jurisdictional dispute rather than a technical favour. Tehran has not ratified UNCLOS, the treaty that would otherwise settle transit-passage rights through the strait.
Norway (Kongsberg Discovery)
Norway (Kongsberg Discovery)
Kongsberg Discovery's Camilla Kiss said the subsea-protection contract shows the industry 'moving from recognising the need to implementing solutions', selling fused sonar and C-Scope software to an unnamed buyer because fragmented cable, pipeline and platform ownership means no single navy commissions this the way it commissions a warship.
Ukraine (Trinity Robotics)
Ukraine (Trinity Robotics)
Trinity Robotics doubled its Konyk One production target to 2,200 units and opened French joint-venture talks, co-founder Oleksii Konik said, because wartime demand outpaces what factories inside a live-fire war zone can safely hold. Ukraine is answering the authority gap other actors face by manufacturing around it.
United Kingdom (Ministry of Defence and Royal Navy)
United Kingdom (Ministry of Defence and Royal Navy)
The Royal Navy proved it can airdrop a mine-hunting robot from any A400M into Sea State 4 waters, working round a front line of just six Type 45 destroyers and eight Type 23/26 frigates rather than waiting for more hulls. First Sea Lord Gwyn Jenkins's 'uncrewed wherever possible' doctrine gets a delivery method; it still lacks a named operational deployment.
Nautilus International
Nautilus International
Nautilus International pressed the unresolved liability gaps as the MASS Code entered force, noting a master stays legally responsible without saying who answers when ashore. Entry into force changed nothing an operator may legally do, leaving the seafarer-displacement question open.