Skip to content
Briefings are running a touch slower this week while we rebuild the foundations.See roadmap
Autonomous Systems: Land & Sea
29MAY

First global code for crewless ships

4 min read
08:47UTC

The IMO adopted the first global code for autonomous cargo ships on 22 May in London. It is voluntary until 2032 and keeps a human master legally on the hook from ashore.

TechnologyDeveloping
Key takeaway

Global rules for self-sailing cargo ships now exist, but stay voluntary until 2032 with a human master still liable.

The International Maritime Organization (IMO), the United Nations body that writes shipping safety rules, adopted the first code for Maritime Autonomous Surface Ships (MASS) on 22 May, closing its Maritime Safety Committee (MSC) 111 session in London. 1 A MASS is a cargo vessel that senses, decides and steers with a reduced crew or none aboard. The code enters force on 1 July 2026, applies to cargo ships only, and keeps a human master legally responsible even when that master sits in a control room ashore.

The small print blunts the milestone. The code is non-mandatory until a binding version targeted for 1 January 2032, and the years between open an Experience Building Phase in which flag states collect operational data and decide for themselves what to permit. The Experience Building Phase exists because no regulator yet holds enough crewless-voyage data to write binding rules. The gap is a data-collection device, but it also lets national regimes diverge.

Classification societies already run ahead of it. DNV and Lloyd's Register, the bodies that certify ships as safe and seaworthy, certify autonomous and remotely operated vessels under their own rules today. 2 That inverts the usual order: SOLAS safety rules normally precede the technology, whereas here the IMO is racing to catch up to commercial practice. The risk is a patchwork of national interpretations during the gap, plus a new shoreside regulated entity, the Remote Control Centre, whose liability questions the code defers rather than settles. Nautilus International, the seafarers' union, argues the master should stay aboard while any crew are present, a labour counterweight to the cost case for emptying the bridge.

The same autonomy stack that runs a crewless box ship runs a minehunter and a subsea-cable inspection drone, which is why a shipping safety code matters to a defence procurement reader.

Deep Analysis

In plain English

International rules for shipping are set by a United Nations agency called the IMO, which stands for International Maritime Organization. On 22 May the IMO agreed the first global rules for ships that operate with no crew on the bridge, or with a much smaller crew controlled from an office on land. These rules are currently voluntary: shipping companies can follow them or not. They become compulsory in 2032. The main sticking point is who is legally responsible if a crewless ship crashes or sinks. The new code says a human "master" on shore is still in charge, but seafarers' unions argue that is not safe if that person is managing several ships at once from a screen.

Deep Analysis
Root Causes

The six-year non-mandatory gap reflects a genuine institutional constraint: the IMO operates by consensus among 175 member states with widely different coastguard and port-state control capacity. Flag-of-convenience states account for the majority of global tonnage; several lack the domestic technical regulation needed to enforce a mandatory autonomous vessel standard today.

The deferred timeline also reflects classification society lobbying. DNV and Lloyd's Register have built first-mover advantage through their own autonomous vessel class notations. A fast mandatory standard risks locking in criteria that disadvantage their proprietary frameworks or force immediate retrofits on vessels they have already certified under weaker rules.

What could happen next?
  • Precedent

    The MASS Code's goal-based, deferred-mandatory model sets the template for how the IMO will regulate other emerging maritime technologies, including hydrogen-fuelled vessels and underwater data cables.

    Medium term · Suggested
  • Risk

    Flag-state divergence on remote-master liability during the 2026-2032 voluntary period creates a regulatory arbitrage window: operators may choose flags with the weakest enforcement.

    Short term · Assessed
  • Opportunity

    Classification societies with existing autonomous-vessel class notations, particularly DNV and Lloyd's Register, gain a commercial advantage as the only bodies currently issuing certificates that comply with the MASS Code's technical objectives.

    Immediate · Reported
First Reported In

Update #1 · UK's robot navy sails for Hormuz

International Maritime Organization· 29 May 2026
Read original
Different Perspectives
HII / US defence industry
HII / US defence industry
HII used the Combined Naval Event to lock in a UK industrial presence through Babcock's ARMOR Force initiative and an expanded Portchester hub, ahead of an expected NATO-wide UUV procurement wave following seabed-infrastructure attacks in 2023-24. The strategic logic is to establish switching costs for Royal Navy procurement before European alternatives secure equivalent reference sales.
Thales / French defence industry
Thales / French defence industry
Thales leads the Anglo-French MMCM programme that produced RNMB Ariadne, and its TSAM sonar is the mine-detection system aboard. A successful Hormuz operational debut converts a development contract into an export reference, and France's naval procurement community has a direct commercial interest in the mission proceeding rather than remaining a deterrence posture.
Ukraine armed forces
Ukraine armed forces
Ukraine's 25,000-robot target reflects a doctrine adapted to drone-saturated airspace above 30 metres, where Russian loitering munitions contest air logistics and ground robots fill the resupply role. The fivefold ARX order is the first confirmed European production response to that demand.
Nautilus International
Nautilus International
The seafarers' union argued at MSC 111 that the master should remain aboard while any crew are present, contesting the bridge-empty model the MASS Code permits. The six-year non-mandatory gap leaves enforcement pressure on seafarers before liability law is settled.
International Maritime Organization
International Maritime Organization
The IMO adopted the MASS Code at MSC 111 on 22 May after years of preparation, but DNV and Lloyd's Register class rules pre-dated it by several years. Secretary-General Arsenio Dominguez's goal-based model deliberately left the technical means to flag states, which is also why the mandatory date was set six years out.
Royal Navy / UK Ministry of Defence
Royal Navy / UK Ministry of Defence
General Sir Gwyn Jenkins set the service's autonomy doctrine on 19 May and the RNMB Ariadne deployment followed eight days later, connecting doctrine to hardware in under a fortnight. For the MoD, a successful Hormuz debut for autonomous mine countermeasures would justify accelerating the uncrewed programme of record and retiring ageing Hunt and Sandown-class manned minehunters sooner.