Skip to content
Artemis II Moon Mission
10APR

Two Storm Forecasting Models Get Their First Live Test

2 min read
11:48UTC

A machine-learning model and a physics simulation are competing to predict solar storms for a crewed mission. The G2 storm arrived on schedule to test them.

ScienceDeveloping
Key takeaway

The G2 storm provides the first live validation test for deep-space solar forecasting models.

University of Michigan researchers deployed 2 solar storm forecasting models for operational testing during the Artemis II transit on 1 April 1. The first is a machine-learning model that uses imagery from SDO (Solar Dynamics Observatory) and SOHO (Solar and Heliospheric Observatory) to generate daily storm probability estimates. The second is a physics-based simulation offering up to 24 hours' advance warning, requiring 3,000 processing units on a NASA supercomputer.

The G2 storm now active provides a live test environment that the research team could not have guaranteed. Apollo had no equivalent forecasting capability. The August 1972 solar particle event that fell between Apollo 16 and 17 arrived without warning. Had a crew been in transit, the consequences could have been severe.

Only the top 5% of solar particle events produce nausea-level radiation exposure 2. The current storm does not appear to approach that threshold. But the value of these models lies not in the storm that does not harm, but in the warning that arrives before the one that could.

If the models issue actionable warnings that align with observed conditions over the next 48 hours, they validate a prediction capability for all future crewed deep-space operations. If they miss, the gap between forecast and reality will itself be instructive data.

Deep Analysis

In plain English

Scientists at the University of Michigan have two different computer systems designed to predict dangerous solar storms before they happen. One uses pattern recognition on satellite images of the Sun, similar to how facial recognition software works. The other runs a detailed physics simulation of how solar activity develops. Both are running right now during this mission. The G2 storm that developed provides the first real test of whether their predictions match what is actually happening. If they work, future astronauts could get up to 24 hours warning before a dangerous storm arrives.

What could happen next?
  • Validated solar forecasting models would enable future deep-space crews to pre-position in shielded compartments before storm arrival, potentially halving crew radiation exposure on high-activity missions.

First Reported In

Update #2 · Solar storm threatens Orion beyond Earth

Phys.org / University of Michigan· 3 Apr 2026
Read original
Causes and effects
This Event
Two Storm Forecasting Models Get Their First Live Test
If either model delivers actionable warnings during the current G2 storm, it validates a new forecasting capability that Apollo entirely lacked.
Different Perspectives
Dual-framework nations
Dual-framework nations
Signing both the Artemis Accords and the ILRS framework is rational hedging, not defection; smaller nations maximise access without exclusive commitment. Lunar governance is genuinely multipolar, and the US coalition count of 61 overstates exclusivity.
ESA
ESA
ESA Director General Aschbacher is holding his Gateway recovery response until the June 2026 Council meeting, keeping $4.4bn in partner contracts in strategic limbo. The European Service Module's flawless performance throughout Artemis II gives ESA genuine technical leverage for that negotiation.
NASA
NASA
NASA declared Artemis II a complete mission success: splashdown on schedule, crew safe, lofted return trajectory validated for the first time with crew aboard. The agency framed the result as proof the architecture can deliver humans to deep space and bring them home. Post-recovery heat shield and bolt inspection is the next gate.
Boeing / Northrop Grumman
Boeing / Northrop Grumman
SLS component production spans more than 40 US states, giving the industrial base strong political protection regardless of commercial alternatives. Congressional mandates guarantee contracts through FY2029, insulating the supply chain from technical programme changes.
NASA Office of Inspector General
NASA Office of Inspector General
The IRB heat shield findings should have been published before launch. The Starship HLS is two years behind schedule with a worsening manual control dispute. NASA has no crew rescue capability for lunar surface operations. The programme is proceeding with documented, unresolved risks.
US: NASA, White House, Congress
US: NASA, White House, Congress
NASA cleared five anomalies with no public dose data and no mention of the cabin alarm. Isaacman's FY2027 proposal designates Artemis the sole protected programme while cutting science 47%; Congress rejected the identical FY2026 top-line, and over 100 members already requested more science funding. OIG audit IG-26-004 found Starship HLS two years late with no crew rescue capability.