Skip to content
You can now search across every topic, entity and event.What's new
2026 FIFA World Cup
25JUL

Iran squad cleared for US visas

3 min read
11:57UTC

US officials confirmed on 5 June that the embassy in Ankara issued visas to Iran's World Cup squad, one day after the team flew to its Tijuana base without them.

SportDeveloping

Three unnamed US officials confirmed on Friday 5 June that the US Embassy in Ankara issued visas to Iran's World Cup squad, covering players, coaches and what the government called "necessary support staff" 1. US Ambassador to Turkey Tom Barrack credited the Ankara embassy for the processing. The approval reverses the picture from a day earlier, when the squad had boarded an Antalya flight bound for Tijuana without those visas in hand .

FFIRI president Mehdi Taj said every passport had been submitted to Ankara on FIFA's instruction, adding that his assessment was that all visas would be issued in full 2. FFIRI is the Football Federation of the Islamic Republic of Iran, the body managing the squad's travel. The clearance arrives after Mexico granted its own visas on 2 June while the US file stayed open, with striker Mehdi Taremi's 2010-2012 service in the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps named as the bar .

Waiver authority over that bar, Section 212(a)(3)(B) of US immigration law, sits with the Secretary of State rather than with consular officers. Barrack crediting the embassy reads as a political processing decision, not a legal clearance of the IRGC question. That distinction is why squad-level approval can stand while individual files remain open, and why the team still faces the harder problem the visas do not solve: a Tijuana base requiring three separate US border crossings during the group stage.

Deep Analysis

In plain English

Iran's football squad needed special US government permission to enter the country for the World Cup. The problem was that some players had previously served in Iran's Revolutionary Guard, a military organisation the US government officially considers a terrorist group. That service, even if it was standard military conscription years ago, creates a legal bar under US immigration law. On 5 June, the US Embassy in Ankara, Turkey granted visas to the squad. The squad had been using Ankara as their processing point because Iran and the US have no direct diplomatic relations. This cleared the team to travel to their base camp in Tijuana, Mexico, from which they will cross into the US for their group matches in Los Angeles.

Deep Analysis
Root Causes

The visa impasse traces to a specific statutory gap. Section 212(a)(3)(B) of the US Immigration and Nationality Act bars entry to members of organisations designated as foreign terrorist organisations. The IRGC received that designation in April 2019. FIFA's 2026 host agreement does not include a blanket athlete-visa guarantee, unlike the IOC's host-city contract template which reserves visa facilitation rights for participating nations.

The Tijuana base camp decision was itself a symptom of this gap: by grounding the squad in Mexico, FFIRI reduced the number of individual US border crossings from a permanent residence requirement to a match-day transit pass, lowering the legal threshold each player needed to clear.

The Ankara routing closed the remaining procedural gap by using a consular post in a NATO ally state where State Department waiver authority applies more flexibly than it would inside Iran's own diplomatic mission.

What could happen next?
  • Precedent

    The Ankara routing establishes that FIFA can use third-country consular posts to resolve squad visa disputes without requiring direct US-Iran diplomatic contact, a template applicable to any future tournament involving sanctioned nations.

    Long term · Assessed
  • Risk

    The individual inadmissibility file for players with IRGC service history remains structurally open; a US administration change or a security incident before the tournament could trigger a retroactive review of the waivers granted through Ankara.

    Short term · Reported
  • Consequence

    Trump's travel ban (ID:1357) continues to bar Iranian fans from attending Group G matches, meaning the squad plays before crowds that cannot include Iranian supporters.

    Immediate · Assessed
First Reported In

Update #15 · Iran's squad in, its staff out

NBC Los Angeles· 6 Jun 2026
Read original
Different Perspectives
Real Madrid
Real Madrid
Operating internally on the basis Rodri joins, according to David Ornstein's reporting, despite no talks having taken place with Manchester City. The gap between internal planning and actual negotiation is itself notable.
Manchester City
Manchester City
Unwilling to sell Rodri, with manager Enzo Maresca stating he returns to the club after back surgery. No club-to-club talks with Real Madrid are taking place, contradicting the framing of a deal in motion.
CONMEBOL
CONMEBOL
Backs the move to a 64-team 2030 tournament co-hosted across South America. Has not engaged publicly with FIFPRO's workload or heat-threshold objections drawn from this tournament's data.
FIFA
FIFA
Points to its 30 June technical and officiating reviews as the authoritative account of the tournament's football, including Collina's rejection of bias claims. Has not publicly responded to the renewed compensation call or disputed FIFPRO's heat-threshold figures.
FIFPRO
FIFPRO
Measures a four-degree gap between its own 28C postponement threshold and FIFA's 32C cooling-break trigger, breached in 19% of matches played. Cites a 70-83 match workload projection to oppose the 64-team 2030 format.
Human Rights Watch
Human Rights Watch
Documents 54 immigration-custody deaths before kickoff and two since, and revives the compensation duty FIFA's own advisers identified after Qatar 2022 and never acted on. Treats the pattern as unresolved FIFA liability, not a closed file.