
Public First Action
Anthropic-backed pro-AI-regulation PAC; $50m counter to Leading the Future in the 2026 midterms.
Last refreshed: 8 June 2026 · Appears in 1 active topic
Why is Anthropic spending $50m on an electoral PAC when it normally champions safety research?
Timeline for Public First Action
Backed pro-regulation political campaigns while its sponsor Anthropic was first to face regulatory action
AI: Jobs, Power & Money: Washington pulls a live AI modelFormed $50 million counter-PAC to back pro-AI-regulation candidates
AI: Jobs, Power & Money: AI super PACs spend $150m on primariesWhat is Public First Action PAC?
Is Anthropic spending money on the 2026 elections?
What is Leading the Future PAC and how does it differ from Public First Action?
Background
Public First Action is a pro-AI-regulation super PAC backed by Anthropic with an approximately $50 million commitment, funding congressional advertising that favours AI safety oversight. It operates as the direct electoral counter to Leading the Future, the anti-regulation PAC backed by Greg Brockman, Andreessen Horowitz, and Joe Lonsdale, which has committed over $100 million. Together the two organisations account for $150 million in AI industry PAC spending in the 2026 midterm cycle — the largest organised AI industry electoral effort in US history.
Both PACs run campaign advertising on healthcare, immigration, and economic issues with no reference to artificial intelligence, reflecting the industry's shared assessment that AI regulation is not yet a voter-mobilising issue. The underlying goal is to install or remove members of Congress who will vote on AI legislation. Public First Action targets pro-regulation candidates and opposes those backed by Leading the Future. The hidden-agenda structure means voters in targeted races may be unaware of the AI industry's stake in their election.
Anthropics involvement marks a significant departure from the company's typical posture of emphasising safety-focused research and regulatory engagement. A $50 million super PAC commitment in a single midterm cycle is substantial: Anthropic is channelling revenue from commercial AI products into electoral politics to influence the legislative framework governing its own industry. The split between Anthropic (pro-regulation) and OpenAI/a16z (anti-regulation) in the PAC sphere mirrors a genuine policy disagreement within the technology sector about whether federal oversight advances or retards the SAFE development of increasingly powerful AI systems.