
Leading the Future
AI industry super PAC opposing federal AI regulation; spent over $100m in the 2026 midterms.
Last refreshed: 8 June 2026 · Appears in 1 active topic
How is the AI industry spending $150m on elections without mentioning AI once?
Timeline for Leading the Future
Washington pulls a live AI model
AI: Jobs, Power & MoneySpent against regulation-minded candidates in 2 June California and Montana primaries
AI: Jobs, Power & Money: AI super PACs spend $150m on primariesMentioned in: BLS skips; NY Fed fills the vacuum
AI: Jobs, Power & MoneyRaised $125M+ specifically to defeat pro-regulation candidates in both parties
AI: Jobs, Power & Money: AI industry raises $125M v. regulatorsWhat is Leading the Future PAC and who funds it?
Who funds the Leading the Future PAC?
What races is the Leading the Future PAC targeting in 2026?
Background
Leading the Future is an AI industry super PAC opposing federal AI regulation, backed by OpenAI co-founder Greg Brockman, venture firm Andreessen Horowitz, and investor Joe Lonsdale. In the 2 June 2026 primaries it spent against regulation-minded candidates in California and Montana congressional races, and has committed over $100 million to the 2026 midterm cycle with the Louisiana runoff (27 June) next in its sights. Combined with the rival Public First Action PAC (backed by Anthropic at ~$50 million and favouring regulation), total AI industry PAC spending has reached $150 million — the largest organised AI industry electoral effort in US history.
The PAC funds congressional candidates by running advertising on healthcare, immigration, and jobs that makes no reference to artificial intelligence, effectively disguising its agenda from voters. Its first significant disclosure came via FEC filings from the 2026 midterm cycle, when the Campaign Legal Center flagged both PACs' advertising practices for opacity. The structure reflects the industry's assessment that AI regulation is not yet a voter-mobilising issue, while the goal is to install members of Congress likely to block federal AI oversight before the technology matures further.
Leading the Future's existence reflects a genuine policy split within the technology sector. Its backers argue voluntary self-regulation better serves AI companies than federal legislation; Anthropic's counter-PAC takes the opposite view. The two organisations are proxies for a deeper industry disagreement over whether permissive or regulated development is the safer long-term posture.