Skip to content
Briefings are running a touch slower this week while we rebuild the foundations.See roadmap
Multilevel Regression and Post-stratification (MRP)
Concept

Multilevel Regression and Post-stratification (MRP)

Polling technique projecting seat-level results from demographic data; suffered its worst UK election failure on 7 May 2026.

Last refreshed: 9 May 2026 · Appears in 1 active topic

Key Question

Why did MRP predict 2,342 Reform council seats when the actual result was 1,448?

Timeline for Multilevel Regression and Post-stratification (MRP)

View full timeline →
Common Questions
What does MRP stand for in polling?
Multilevel Regression and Post-stratification. It combines a national survey sample with local demographic data to project seat-by-seat results rather than just national vote shares.Source: uk-elections-2026 briefing
How accurate is MRP polling?
YouGov's MRP has come within five seats of the final result at every UK general election since 2017, giving it a strong track record in first-past-the-post elections.
What does the Senedd 2026 MRP project?
YouGov's MRP projects Plaid Cymru on 43 seats, Reform UK on 30, Welsh Labour on 12, Greens on 10 and Welsh Conservatives on 1 in the 96-seat Senedd.
What does the Scotland 2026 MRP project?
Electoral Calculus (7 April 2026) projects the SNP on 67 seats — two above the 65-seat majority threshold — with Reform UK on 14 regional seats and the Conservatives falling to 9.
Who produces MRP polls for UK elections?
YouGov, Electoral Calculus, and More in Common are the main producers. Academic teams at universities also produce MRP models for research purposes.
How wrong was the MRP projection for Reform UK in 2026?
The PollCheck/YouGov MRP projected Reform UK would win 2,342 England council seats; the actual result was 1,448, an 894-seat (38%) undershoot, the worst MRP projection failure in modern UK polling.Source: Update 339
Why did MRP polling get the 2026 local election results so wrong?
MRP assumes uniform swing within demographic cells. Reform UK's vote concentrated in specific ward types rather than distributing uniformly, causing the model to systematically overstate Reform's reach across English councils.Source: Update 339
How accurate was MRP in the 2026 Welsh and Scottish elections?
Highly accurate. YouGov's Senedd MRP projected Plaid Cymru at 43 seats — the exact result under D'Hondt. The Holyrood MRP was 7 seats off (projected 62 SNP, actual 58) under AMS. Only the English FPTP local election saw the major miss.Source: Update 339
Who uses MRP polls in UK elections?
YouGov, Electoral Calculus, and More in Common are the main producers. Academic teams at UK universities also produce MRP models for research purposes.Source: uk-elections-2026 briefing

Background

Multilevel Regression and Post-stratification (MRP) is a statistical polling technique that combines a large national survey with granular demographic data to produce constituency-level or ward-level vote projections rather than a single national vote share. The method has become central to UK election forecasting: YouGov has used it at every UK general election since 2017, coming within five seats of the final result each time, giving MRP a reputation as the most reliable tool for fragmented multi-party elections. Electoral Calculus, More in Common, and academic teams also produce MRP models.

The 7 May 2026 English local elections delivered MRP's most significant failure in modern British polling. The PollCheck/YouGov MRP projected Reform UK to win 2,342 England council seats; the actual result was 1,448 — an 894-seat undershoot, a 38% miss, the largest single-election gap between MRP projection and outcome on record. The same YouGov model projected SNP at 62 Holyrood seats (actual: 58) — a 7-seat miss on AMS — and the Senedd MRP projected Plaid Cymru at 43 seats, which matched the actual result exactly. The contrast is stark: MRP's first-past-the-post application failed at scale in fragmented English local elections, while its performance on proportional systems (D'Hondt Wales, AMS Scotland) was accurate.

The failure has technical roots in MRP's core assumption of uniform swing within demographic groups. When Reform UK's vote concentrated in specific ward types rather than distributing uniformly across demographic cells, the model overstated its reach systematically. The 2026 episode will benchmark the limits of MRP in high-fragmentation multi-candidate FPTP environments, and will be the reference point in any 2028 UK general election modelling discussion.