Skip to content
Lord Hermer KC
PersonGB

Lord Hermer KC

UK Attorney General; advised the Iran operation is unlawful, shaping Starmer's base access limits.

Last refreshed: 28 March 2026 · Appears in 1 active topic

Key Question

The UK's top lawyer said the Iran war is illegal. The PM authorised bases anyway. Who decides?

Latest on Lord Hermer KC

Common Questions
What did Lord Hermer say about the Iran war?
Lord Hermer advised that the US-Israeli operation does not accord with international law. The 'imminent threat' threshold for preemptive strikes was not met.Source: event
Who is Lord Hermer KC?
Richard Hermer KC (Baron Hermer of Caerphilly) is the UK Attorney General, appointed July 2024. A human rights barrister from Matrix Chambers, the set Starmer co-founded.
Is UK involvement in Iran legal?
The Attorney General advised the wider operation is unlawful but covered 'specific and limited defensive operations' under collective self-defence. Chatham House argued this blurs the line between self-defence and war.Source: Chatham House
Why did Starmer refuse Akrotiri for offensive strikes?
Lord Hermer's legal advice drew the line between defensive and offensive base use. Akrotiri was refused for offensive operations; Diego Garcia and RAF Fairford were authorised for defensive purposes only.Source: event

Background

Richard Hermer KC (Baron Hermer of Caerphilly) was appointed Attorney General in July 2024 when Starmer formed a Labour government. A human rights barrister at Matrix Chambers (the set Starmer co-founded), he built his practice around International humanitarian law and the European Court of Human Rights. After Iran struck Gulf States on 1 March, Starmer reversed course and authorised "specific and limited defensive operations" from Diego Garcia and RAF Fairford. Hermer's advice covered this narrower scope under collective self-defence.

Lord Hermer advised that the US-Israeli operation against Iran does not accord with international law, establishing that preemptive strikes require an "imminent threat" to Britain that Operation Epic Fury on 28 February did not meet. The advice shaped PM Starmer's initial refusal of US base access and continues to underpin the legal line between "defensive" and "offensive" operations from British territory.

Hermer's legal framework is now the foundation for both sides of the UK debate. The government cites it to justify limited defensive use; the opposition cites the same advice to argue the operation itself is unlawful. Chatham House argued the distinction "blurs the line between lawful self-defence and unlawful war on Iran." 58% of Britons oppose base access and Corbyn has tabled a bill requiring parliamentary approval.

Source Material