Lord Alton
Crossbench peer and JCHR chair, a long-standing China and Hong Kong human-rights campaigner.
Lord Alton, a crossbench peer and JCHR chair, has a transnational-repression amendment before the Cyber Security and Resilience Bill's Lords committee as of 23 July 2026; whether it has been tabled, debated or adopted is not yet confirmed.
Last refreshed: 3 August 2026 · Appears in 1 active topic
Could a Lords amendment stop the UK sharing data with regimes that target dissidents abroad?
Timeline for Lord Alton
Cyber resilience bill at Lords committee
Cybersecurity: Threats and DefencesMentioned in: Police press for a 'digital prison'
Cybersecurity: Threats and DefencesBackground
Lord Alton is a crossbench member of the House of Lords and chair of the Joint Committee on Human Rights, with a long record campaigning on China and Hong Kong human rights, covering forced labour, religious persecution and the treatment of Hong Kong activists living overseas.
His interest in transnational repression, the pursuit or intimidation of dissidents and diaspora communities by foreign states beyond their own borders, predates the Cyber Security and Resilience Bill and reflects that wider human-rights focus rather than any specialism in cyber policy.
He has a history of using amendments to bills whose primary subject lies elsewhere as a vehicle for human-rights concerns, a pattern consistent with attaching a transnational-repression amendment to cyber-security legislation rather than to a bill focused on human rights directly.
Amendment's fate remains unconfirmed
Lord Alton has tabled, or is seeking to table, an amendment on transnational repression to the Cyber Security and Resilience Bill; the amendment paper accompanying the bill's Lords committee stage, dated 23 July 2026, records the subject as under consideration. For a peer whose record runs through China, Hong Kong and the intimidation of diaspora communities rather than critical-infrastructure security, the bill is a vehicle he has reached for, not his usual ground: he is attaching a human-rights concern to legislation moving through the Lords for reasons that have nothing to do with him.
Whether the amendment has actually been debated or adopted could not be confirmed from the published record available to this page. An unconfirmed amendment is not a defeated or withdrawn one, and readers should not infer either outcome. This page will be updated once the committee record or a later stage of the bill clarifies the amendment's progress.