Skip to content
You can now search across every topic, entity and event.What's new
AB 2656
LegislationUS

AB 2656

California Assembly Bill 2656, requiring state and local public employers to give 45 days' written notice before deploying AI within unionised job classifications.

California's AB 2656, requiring 45 days' notice before deploying AI in unionised public-sector roles, passed the Assembly 72-2 on 26 May 2026 and cleared the Senate Labor Committee 5-0 on 17 June, advancing to the Senate Privacy Committee.

Last refreshed: 27 July 2026 · Appears in 1 active topic

Key Question

Will California's 45-day AI notice rule survive Newsom's veto pen this time?

Timeline for AB 2656

#16 1 Jul
#14 17 Jun

Cleared Senate Labor committee 5-0 on 17 June after Assembly 72-2 on 26 May

AI: Jobs, Power & Money: California eyes 45-day AI notice rule
View full timeline →

Background

AB 2656 is the most advanced AI labour-protection bill in California's 2025-26 legislative session targeting the public sector, authored by Assembly Member Petrie-Norris. It would require state and local public employers to give at least 45 days' written notice before deploying generative AI within unionised job classifications.

The bill is modelled on AB 339, in force since 1 January 2026, which mandates 45-day notice for public agency contract solicitations touching represented work; AB 2656 extends that transparency framework specifically to AI deployment. It is narrowly scoped to state and local public employers and unionised workers, and does not apply to private-sector employers or non-represented classifications.

That narrow scope makes AB 2656 more likely to survive the legislative calendar than broader private-sector AI-employment bills, which face heavier employer opposition; it sits alongside SB 951, which targets a 25% workforce-displacement threshold across all employers, and AB 2545, which would have the state Employment Development Department collect AI-impact data.

Key Issues
AI notice law

It requires 45 days' notice before AI

AB 2656 passed the California Assembly 72-2 on 26 May 2026 and cleared the Senate Labor, Public Employment and Retirement Committee 5-0 on 17 June, advancing to the Senate Privacy Committee. It would require state and local public employers to give recognised employee organisations at least 45 days' written notice before developing, purchasing, implementing or using generative AI within represented job classifications.

The bill is one of three California AI-employment measures advanced through committee by 1 July, alongside a companion bill collecting AI-impact data, while Congress still has no federal AI-employment law on the table and the EU pushed its own AI Act workplace Deadline back to December 2027 over the same fortnight.

Common Questions
When did AB 2656 pass the California Assembly?
AB 2656 passed the California Assembly on 26 May 2026 by a vote of 72-2, then cleared the Senate Labor Committee 5-0 on 17 June 2026.Source: California Legislature
How does California AB 2656 differ from SB 951?
AB 2656 targets public-sector employers and requires 45-day notice before any AI deployment in unionised roles. SB 951 has a broader scope covering private employers and triggers at a 25% workforce displacement threshold.Source: California Legislature
Does AB 2656 apply to private companies in California?
No. AB 2656 applies only to state and local public employers with unionised workforces. Private-sector employers are not covered by this bill.Source: California Legislature / AB 2656 bill text
What does California AB 2656 require employers to do before using AI?
AB 2656 would require state and local public employers to give recognised employee organisations at least 45 days' written notice before deploying generative AI to perform work within unionised job classifications.Source: California Legislature
Will Newsom sign AB 2656 into law?
Unclear. Governor Newsom vetoed several AI regulation bills in 2024 citing economic competitiveness concerns. AB 2656's narrow public-sector scope may improve its chances, but his position on the bill had not been stated publicly as of mid-June 2026.Source: California Legislature
Source Material