Skip to content
Briefings are running a touch slower this week while we rebuild the foundations.See roadmap
US Midterms 2026
28APR

Daines exits; Bodnar leads Montana race

3 min read
16:18UTC

Steve Daines withdrew from the Montana Republican Senate primary; independent candidate Seth Bodnar leads Q1 fundraising in the state's first open Senate race since 1976.

← Back to 189 Days to Go: Calendar versus courtJump to analysis ↓
PoliticsDeveloping
Key takeaway

An open seat plus an independent fundraising leader breaks the two-way frame Cook still uses for Montana.

Senator Steve Daines withdrew from the Montana Republican primary, vacating the seat ahead of first-quarter fundraising disclosures. Independent candidate Seth Bodnar, the former president of the University of Montana, led Q1 fundraising in what is now Montana's first open Senate race since 1976, according to Daily Montanan reporting. Daines endorsed Republican Kurt Alme, the US Attorney for Montana, on his way out of the primary.

Montana's open seat removes the incumbency advantage that has historically dominated the state's Senate calculus. Montana voted for Trump by 20 points in 2024, but Daines's withdrawal eliminates the incumbent factor that polling models built around incumbent-versus-challenger frames had priced in. Bodnar is running as an independent rather than seeking a major-party nomination; in Montana, that places him on the November ballot directly without a primary, while Republicans contest their open primary among Alme and several second-tier candidates.

A three-way contest is structurally different from a two-way one. Cook Political Report did not include Montana in its 13 April Senate rating shifts . The forecaster's models price Montana as a Republican-likely seat on the assumption that any well-funded Republican holds against any Democratic challenger. An independent leading Q1 fundraising disrupts that assumption without converting Montana into a Democratic-likely seat. Counter-view from Republican strategists: Bodnar's fundraising lead is a single-quarter snapshot, Alme has institutional advantages still to deploy, and the historical record on independent Senate candidates winning in red states is thin. Either reading makes Montana more competitive in May than it was in March.

Deep Analysis

In plain English

Republican senator Steve Daines withdrew from the Montana Republican primary, opening the state's Senate race for the first time since 1976. Independent candidate Seth Bodnar, the former president of the University of Montana, is leading early fundraising. Montana voted for Donald Trump by 20 points in 2024, so it should be a comfortable Republican hold. But with no incumbent and an independent in the lead on fundraising, the race is less predictable than it appears on paper.

Deep Analysis
Root Causes

Daines's withdrawal reflects the same electoral pressure visible in Tillis's SAVE Act vote: Republican senators in states where Trump's margin is declining face a primary-versus-general calculation.

Daines, as the National Republican Senatorial Committee chair, had structural reasons to avoid a primary that might expose him to a Bodnar-type independent in the general while also damaging his NRSC credibility. His withdrawal redirects the question to whether Alme, a US Attorney without statewide name recognition, can build the committee infrastructure and donor network to beat an independent who enters the race already leading on fundraising.

What could happen next?
  • Opportunity

    A competitive Montana three-way race would force the National Republican Senatorial Committee to defend a seat it had not budgeted for, pulling resources from Georgia, North Carolina, and Ohio, the three states Cook moved toward Democrats in mid-April.

  • Risk

    Bodnar's independent candidacy without major-party infrastructure may collapse in the final two months of the campaign, when television advertising and ground operations require scale that Q1 fundraising does not guarantee.

Sources:Daily Montanan
Mentions:Cook Political Report →Donald Trump →Maine →Sabato's Crystal Ball →England →Steve Daines →Seth Bodnar →Montana →Daily Montanan →Kurt Alme →Angus King →
First Reported In

Update #4 · 189 Days to Go: Calendar versus court

Daily Montanan· 28 Apr 2026
Read original →
Different Perspectives
EU trade and sanctions policy analysts
EU trade and sanctions policy analysts
EU observers are tracking whether a larger Republican House majority after November 2026 reduces domestic pressure on the White House to negotiate tariff relief. Redistricting-locked Republican committee majorities have historically resisted rollbacks framed as concessions; a Democratic House flip, if the wave overcomes the maps, would restore committee leverage on Financial Services and Ways and Means.
Canadian USMCA trade watchers
Canadian USMCA trade watchers
Canadian trade observers track House committee composition because the Ways and Means Committee processes USMCA tariff schedules. A net Republican redistricting gain of 12-15 seats would consolidate Republican committee chairs through 2028, reducing bipartisan leverage on the 2026 USMCA review window Canada's government has flagged as a priority.
V-Dem Institute and Chatham House
V-Dem Institute and Chatham House
V-Dem's Anna Grzymala-Busse assessed Callais as completing a 13-year constitutional rollback: Shelby County removed preclearance, Brnovich narrowed vote-denial claims, Callais retires the affirmative duty, leaving the VRA practically inoperative in states where all three mechanisms operated together. Chatham House analysts are logging the judgment-forthwith mechanism as a qualitative escalation in procedural acceleration.
Democratic opposition and civil rights plaintiffs
Democratic opposition and civil rights plaintiffs
House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries named New York, Illinois, and Maryland as retaliation targets; the structural problem is that New York requires court action or a constitutional referendum, neither compatible with November 2026. Brennan Center plaintiffs whose Callais forthwith application was rejected around 6-7 May now face a Court that has already declined to stay its own order.
WSJ editorial board: conservative backfire warning
WSJ editorial board: conservative backfire warning
The WSJ editorial board warned that aggressive Republican redistricting in a D+5.9 generic-ballot environment risks backfiring: maps that eliminate competitive districts can energise the opposing base beyond what the drawn-in margins absorb. The warning is the cross-ideological dissent the broader conservative consensus on Callais is not publicly engaging.
Trump administration and Republican state executives
Trump administration and Republican state executives
The White House signed zero election-related executive orders between 28 April and 7 May; presidential influence ran through the Supreme Court majority, the DOJ voter-data litigation, and Article III confirmations. DeSantis, Lee, and Reeves called redistricting sessions within 24 hours of Callais, each acting on executive timetables requiring no referendum or bipartisan agreement.