Skip to content
Briefings are running a touch slower this week while we rebuild the foundations.See roadmap
UK Local Elections 2026
26APR

RPA Bill misses the wash-up window

3 min read
13:33UTC

The Hansard Society's bulletin for the week of 27 April lists four bills the government is fast-tracking through wash-up. The Representation of the People Bill, which carries the retrospective crypto donation ban, is not among them.

PoliticsDeveloping
Key takeaway

Reform UK enters 7 May with the funding rulebook the bill was written to replace.

The Representation of the People Bill sits at its 9th Commons committee sitting on 16 April with no future stage scheduled, according to the Parallel Parliament tracker 1. The Hansard Society confirms Parliament is expected to prorogue no earlier than 29 April and no later than 6 May, with the Leader of the House signalling the earlier date 2. The four wash-up bills the government is pushing through are the English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill, the Pensions Schemes Bill, the Crime and Policing Bill, and the Children's Wellbeing and Schools Bill. Those four together exclude the Representation of the People Bill from the polling-day statute book.

The wash-up convention is bilateral: government picks the bills it judges essential, and the official opposition agrees not to oppose them in exchange for amendments. A bill the opposition wants but the government has deprioritised falls because the government holds the order paper. After committee, the bill still needs Commons report stage, third reading, four Lords stages and any ping-pong before Royal Assent. None of that is scheduled.

Royal Assent before polling day was already arithmetically impossible . The prorogation timeline now confirms a sharper outcome: the bill may fall entirely and require reintroduction in the new session. Under its terms, parties would have 30 days from Royal Assent to return unlawful crypto receipts, alongside a £100,000 cap on overseas elector donations and the shell-company restrictions identified by the Rycroft Review . None of those provisions takes effect for 7 May.

Which means Reform UK enters polling day having received roughly £12m from Christopher Harborne in two quarters, having processed crypto donations through the Poland-based processor Radom Pay, and having no statutory obligation to return any of it. The Electoral Commission still cannot verify those donations because Reform has not provided wallet addresses . Spotlight on Corruption's 1 April report named three further enforcement gaps that survive the bill's passage or failure: crypto-to-fiat conversion before donation, direct personal contributions to MPs, and political memecoins. Those gaps now extend into the next Parliament.

Deep Analysis

In plain English

The UK Parliament 'prorogues' , formally closes its session , before a general or local election. In the final days before prorogation, the government and opposition agree a small number of unfinished bills to push through quickly; this is called 'wash-up'. The Representation of the People Bill would have made it illegal for political parties to keep cryptocurrency donations they could not fully verify, and would have imposed a £100,000 limit on donations from British citizens living abroad. It was designed partly in response to Reform UK receiving £12 million from Christopher Harborne, a cryptocurrency investor living in Thailand. Parliament closed on 29 April without including the bill in wash-up. It never became law. So on polling day, 7 May, none of those restrictions apply. The Electoral Commission , the official body that oversees election spending , cannot force Reform to return any donations, because no law requires it.

Deep Analysis
Root Causes

UK parliamentary procedure has no statutory fast-track mechanism for legislation that becomes electorally urgent inside the dissolution window. Wash-up depends on informal bilateral consent between government and official opposition , a single-veto model in which any party that calculates the bill harms it can block progress without needing to state publicly that it is doing so.

The gap between the bill reaching committee stage on 18 March and the prorogation window on 29 April , 42 days , was insufficient for all-party agreement on the most contested clause. The Electoral Commission, which identified the problem in its January 2026 submission, has no power to compel parliamentary scheduling.

Spotlight on Corruption's April report had already documented three enforcement gaps that persist even if the bill had passed, meaning the legislation would have been a partial fix regardless.

What could happen next?
  • Consequence

    Reform UK enters polling day with no legal obligation to return Christopher Harborne's £12 million, leaving the Electoral Commission without a statutory enforcement route.

    Immediate · 0.95
  • Precedent

    The wash-up omission establishes that a contested single-veto on bilaterally agreed legislation can block retrospective financial regulation through an election cycle, potentially encouraging novel donation structures before the next Westminster election.

    Medium term · 0.7
  • Risk

    If Reform wins substantial council representation on 7 May, the political cost of legislating retrospective crypto rules post-election rises significantly, potentially delaying the reform until after the next Westminster cycle.

    Short term · 0.65
First Reported In

Update #5 · 11 Days to Go: Six-of-six, RPA dies, Welsh lead flips

Parallel Parliament· 26 Apr 2026
Read original
Different Perspectives
Green Party
Green Party
Zack Polanski's campaign delivered the Hackney and Lewisham mayoralties and both councils, plus 543 English council seats, establishing the first Green governing base in outer London. The 153-seat MRP undershoot was attributed to FPTP tactical dynamics in marginal wards rather than a polling error in vote share.
UK Labour Government
UK Labour Government
Keir Starmer's government faces the immediate test of whether to intervene in Lancashire's withdrawal from the UK refugee resettlement scheme and the longer question of how to respond if the SNP tables a Section 30 vote. MHCLG's posture on Reform-controlled councils sets the template for the next four years of divided local government.
Scottish National Party (SNP)
Scottish National Party (SNP)
John Swinney committed to a Section 30 vote on the first Holyrood sitting day post-appointment and a draft referendum bill within 100 days, reframing the 58-seat result as a working mandate despite missing his own 65-seat trigger. Westminster's pre-stated refusal of a Section 30 order means the constitutional confrontation is now a matter of timing.
Plaid Cymru
Plaid Cymru
Rhun ap Iorwerth confirmed on 8 May that Plaid would attempt to govern Wales as a minority, ruling out immediate coalition talks and naming budget priorities as the test of cross-party support. The 43-seat result leaves Plaid six seats short of the 49-seat majority threshold.
Reform UK
Reform UK
Nigel Farage claimed 7 May as a historic breakthrough, pointing to 1,448 new councillors and 14 councils won from a near-zero base. The internal reckoning is that transition teams built for 22 councils must now govern 14, and three of those 14 produced immediate governance disputes.
Wales Governance Centre
Wales Governance Centre
The Centre framed Wales's mid-campaign Green-to-Plaid consolidation as 'consolidation, not conversion' in April, meaning voters did not migrate ideologically but regrouped tactically inside the same bloc because closed-list PR made it arithmetically rational. The final MRP result confirms that framing.