Skip to content
Welcome, thoughtbot's Giant Robots listeners!Start here
Russia-Ukraine War 2026
18MAR

Russian arms exports down 64% — SIPRI

4 min read
11:41UTC

Russia held the world's second-largest arms export market for three decades. SIPRI data shows it has lost 64% of that trade while EU exports outpace even America's growth.

ConflictDeveloping
Key takeaway

Russian arms exports have structurally collapsed — demand destruction, not production failure, is the primary driver.

SIPRI data released on 9 March confirmed that Russian arms exports fell 64% over the most recent five-year measurement period⁠1. The decline ends three decades in which Russia held the world's second-largest arms export market, supplying India, Algeria, Egypt, Vietnam, and dozens of states that chose Soviet-legacy platforms for cost, strategic autonomy, or both.

Three forces drove the collapse. The war in Ukraine consumes domestic production — armoured vehicles, artillery systems, and precision munitions that would fill export contracts are absorbed by a front line that has destroyed thousands of platforms. Western sanctions on microelectronics and machine tools have constrained manufacturing; the strike on the Kremniy El semiconductor plant in Bryansk hit one of Russia's few remaining domestic sources of military-grade microelectronics. And battlefield performance has eroded buyer confidence — Russian air defence systems, armour, and electronic warfare equipment have failed against Ukrainian countermeasures in conditions prospective customers can observe through open-source intelligence.

India, historically Russia's largest arms customer, has accelerated diversification. New Delhi now flies French Rafale fighters, operates American Apache helicopters, and is expanding domestic Tejas production. The S-400 system — once Russia's flagship export programme — has faced repeated delivery delays. When a supplier's own military consumes output faster than factories can produce, commercial reliability erodes regardless of price.

EU member states' arms exports grew 36%, outpacing the US at 27% and China at 11%⁠2. Gulf states that historically purchased American or Russian systems are now buying Ukrainian interceptor drones at $1,000–$2,000 per unit, and Saudi Arabia has signed a separate deal for Ukrainian interceptor missiles. The global arms market is reorganising around the two active wars consuming its inventory — and Russia is losing customers to competitors whose equipment those wars are simultaneously validating.

Deep Analysis

In plain English

Russia was one of the world's top arms sellers for decades, exporting fighter jets, tanks, and air defence systems to customers across Asia, Africa, and the Middle East. The war in Ukraine changed that in two distinct ways. First, customers watching Russian equipment — tanks, helicopters, missiles — fail against Ukrainian forces concluded that Russian arms were less effective than advertised. Second, the threat of US and EU sanctions on buyers of Russian military equipment made procurement politically risky even for governments that wanted to buy. The combined result is a 64% fall in Russian arms exports over five years. Meanwhile, European defence companies that were minor global exporters before 2022 are now growing faster than either the US or China — absorbing orders that would previously have gone to Moscow.

Deep Analysis
Synthesis

The SIPRI data marks the structural end of Russia as a peer competitor in the global arms market. More significantly, EU export growth of 36% — outpacing both the US and China — signals the emergence of a genuinely competitive European defence industrial base. This was a stated goal of the EU Strategic Compass adopted in 2022 but was not expected to materialise within a single procurement cycle. The Ukraine war has compressed a generation of industrial development, validating EU platforms in combat conditions and creating order backlogs that will sustain European defence industries into the 2030s regardless of how the conflict ends.

Root Causes

Three structural forces drive the decline, none addressed in the body. First, demonstrated battlefield performance failures — T-72 and T-80 tank losses at scale, Kinzhal missile intercepts by Patriot, Ka-52 helicopter attrition — destroyed the export marketing value of Russia's flagship platforms; arms buyers purchase on combat reputation. Second, US and EU secondary sanctions on purchasers of Russian military equipment made procurement politically costly even for non-aligned states, with India's S-400 purchase triggering CAATSA scrutiny and deterring subsequent buyers. Third, Russia diverted export-designated inventory to domestic use, breaching delivery contracts with India, Algeria, and Egypt — permanently impairing its reliability as a supplier in ways that outlast any single political calculation.

What could happen next?
  • Consequence

    Countries with deep maintenance dependencies on Russian platforms — India, Algeria, Vietnam — face progressively costly fleet transitions as spare-parts sanctions ground existing inventories.

    Medium term · Assessed
  • Precedent

    EU export growth at 36% establishes European defence industry as a genuine third tier in global arms markets, ending the effectively bipolar US-Russia structure that dominated from 1991 to 2022.

    Long term · Suggested
  • Opportunity

    Countries cancelling or deferring Russian contracts — particularly in fighter aircraft and integrated air defence — represent an immediate sales opportunity for EU manufacturers before Chinese alternatives consolidate those markets.

    Short term · Suggested
  • Risk

    EU export acceleration to conflict-adjacent regions could draw Brussels into secondary proliferation accountability debates currently focused on Russian and Chinese transfer patterns.

    Medium term · Suggested
First Reported In

Update #5 · Trump frees 124m barrels; Russia earns €6bn

SIPRI· 18 Mar 2026
Read original →
Different Perspectives
Government of Latvia
Government of Latvia
Latvia abstained on 22 September when the EU renewed its individual sanctions for 36 months at the price of delisting Alisher Usmanov and Mikhail Fridman, and promised national sanctions of its own. Riga's abstention marks how far a frontline member state will go to keep listed names listed.
India's Ministry of External Affairs
India's Ministry of External Affairs
After the House passed the Graham bill on 16 September, India's foreign ministry said it would keep buying energy on market terms and protect its trade. Russia supplied 30.3% of India's crude imports in fiscal 2026, so the tariff decision due around 18 October falls directly on New Delhi.
Kaja Kallas, EU foreign policy chief
Kaja Kallas, EU foreign policy chief
Kallas answered the US licence on 10 October by saying Europe would not ease pressure, and EU ministers adopted a 22nd package of nearly 1,600 listings two days later. Brussels is tightening as Washington loosens, though TASS reported the package adds no significant new trade restrictions.
Donald Trump and the US Treasury
Donald Trump and the US Treasury
The Treasury licensed Russian diesel imports until 7 April 2027 on the day of Trump's call with Putin, and Trump then told reporters Ukraine should find a new leader. Washington is trading sanctions relief for fuel supply while pressing Kyiv to halt the refinery strikes behind the shortage.
Kremlin and Deputy Prime Minister Alexander Novak
Kremlin and Deputy Prime Minister Alexander Novak
After the 9 October call the Kremlin said Russia was ready to supply oil and petroleum products to American and global markets, and Novak brought forward the end of diesel export curbs. Moscow is selling the shortage back as goodwill, with volumes that Decree No. 686 now hides from outside checks.
Volodymyr Zelenskyy, President of Ukraine
Volodymyr Zelenskyy, President of Ukraine
Zelenskyy called GL 135 an investment in prolonging the war and offered to stop striking Russian refineries if Russia stops destroying Ukraine's energy system. Answering Trump's call for a new leader, he set a total 60-day ceasefire as the condition for elections, which puts the next move on Moscow.