13MAY

Mourning and fireworks on Iran streets

3 min read

20:00UTC

While Western cameras fixated on celebrations, pro-regime mourning crowds also gathered across Iran — a country too divided for any single image to represent.

← Back to 800 drones, three ceasefires, one cliff Jump to analysis ↓

ConflictDeveloping

Key takeaway

The coexistence of mourning and celebration crowds in Iran reflects a genuine societal fracture rather than a unified national response, and will shape the political landscape of whatever comes next.

Pro-regime mourning crowds gathered across Iran in the hours after Khamenei's death was confirmed , a parallel reality to the fireworks and 'Death to Khamenei' chants in Tehran, Karaj, Borazjan, and Mamasani (ID:474). Western broadcasters led overwhelmingly with the celebrations. The mourners received less airtime. Both were real.

The Islamic Republic has never lacked a domestic constituency. The Basij and IRGC employ or subsidise millions of families. The bonyads — revolutionary foundations controlling an estimated 20% of Iran's GDP — distribute patronage deep into provincial towns and rural communities. Religious conservatives in Qom, Mashhad, and the smaller shrine cities hold genuine reverence for the velayat-e faqih, the guardianship of the jurist that Khamenei embodied. A framework that treats 87 million Iranians as a monolithic bloc awaiting liberation has failed every time it has been tested — in 1953, in 2003 next door, in 2011 across the Arab world.

Separating genuine grief from orchestrated display is impossible under current conditions. The IRGC's reported deployment of armed members on motorbikes through Tehran — cited by Middle East Eye from unverified sources — means mourning crowds gathered under the watch of the same apparatus that killed an estimated 36,000 protesters in January . A crowd assembled under visible armed surveillance is not the same as one assembled freely, and no camera resolves that ambiguity.

Iran is fighting two simultaneous crises: external military attack and internal state fracture. The National Security Council's instruction for Tehran residents to evacuate, the empty supermarket shelves in northern Tehran, and the IRGC's street patrols all indicate the security apparatus considers domestic control at least as urgent as the foreign threat. During the Iran-Iraq War (1980–1988), the Khomeini government weaponised external conflict to consolidate internal power. Whether a decapitated state can execute the same manoeuvre is the open question.

Deep Analysis

In plain English

When news of Khamenei's death spread, Iran did not react as one. In some parts of the country, people set off fireworks, took to the streets in joy, and celebrated what they saw as the fall of a repressive regime. In other parts, people gathered to mourn — whether out of genuine grief, religious duty, or fear of what happens next. Both crowds are real. This is not a country that has been 'liberated' and is uniformly grateful, nor is it a country uniformly devastated by a foreign attack. It is a deeply divided society processing an enormous shock through contradictory but equally authentic responses.

Deep Analysis

Synthesis

The dual crowd is the most honest single image of what Iran actually is: a country in which the same event — the death of the supreme leader under foreign bombs — produces both relief and grief, sometimes within the same family. Western media's tendency to amplify the celebrations and authoritarian media's tendency to show only the mourning and the bombs are both acts of political curation rather than journalism. The political implications are profound: any post-Khamenei governance arrangement must reckon with a society that is genuinely split, not one that has been uniformly liberated. The mourning crowds are not simply regime plants or coerced participants — they represent a constituency that will need to be accommodated in any stable settlement, and whose alienation will be a resource for any actor seeking to destabilise whatever comes next.

Root Causes

The pro-regime crowd reflects constituencies with genuine stakes in the survival of the Islamic Republic's order: families of IRGC members, religious conservatives whose identity and community infrastructure is bound to the clerical state, and those who genuinely feared the alternative more than the regime. The January 2026 massacre (Event 10) did not eliminate these constituencies; it radicalised both sides of the divide simultaneously. Decades of state investment in religious and ideological infrastructure — mosques, seminaries, state media — have produced a genuine social base for the Islamic Republic that cannot be dismissed as pure performance, even if its size relative to the opposition is uncertain.

Escalation

The existence of organised pro-regime mourning crowds alongside street celebrations creates conditions for inter-communal confrontation. If IRGC units (Event 2) are protecting or facilitating mourning gatherings while simultaneously intimidating celebratory crowds, the potential for direct violent clashes between the two groups increases significantly. Historical transitions from authoritarian regimes in which the security apparatus retains armed capacity — Iraq 2003, Libya 2011 — demonstrate that dual-crowd dynamics can rapidly transition from parallel protest to active conflict. The interim council's ability to prevent such confrontation is uncertain given the disruption to command structures following the strikes.

What could happen next?

1 meaning2 risk1 consequence1 precedent

Meaning
The dual crowd reveals that Iran is not experiencing a unified liberation but a contested societal fracture that will define the political character of whatever governance follows.
Immediate · Assessed
Risk
Direct confrontation between mourning and celebration crowds, particularly if IRGC units align with one side, could trigger inter-communal violence in Tehran and other major cities.
Immediate · Assessed
Consequence
Pro-regime constituencies, even if currently a minority, represent a durable political base that any interim or successor government will need to manage rather than simply suppress.
Medium term · Assessed
Risk
The societal fracture visible in dual crowds will be exploited by external actors — Russia, China, and regional proxies — to sustain instability and prevent consolidation of any pro-Western successor government.
Medium term · Assessed
Precedent
If mourning crowds provide a social base for IRGC remnants to reconstitute political authority, Iran could follow a trajectory similar to post-2003 Iraq, where regime remnants became the nucleus of sustained insurgency.
Long term · Suggested

Source Landscape

This story draws on mixed-leaning sources from United Kingdom

United Kingdom×2

The simultaneous existence of mourning and celebration crowds following the death of an authoritarian leader is not unprecedented.

After the death of Joseph Stalin in 1953, Soviet citizens publicly mourned while many privately celebrated; the distinction between performed and genuine grief was later documented extensively.

Following Saddam Hussein's capture in 2003, Iraq similarly split between those who mourned the old order and those who celebrated its fall, with the split broadly tracking sectarian and ethnic lines.

Why it’s relevant now

The Iranian parallel is more complex than either precedent because the split does not map cleanly onto ethnicity or sect — it reflects the depth of polarisation produced by a government that killed tens of thousands of its own citizens six weeks before its leader's death.

Political scientists studying authoritarian transitions — including those at the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace and the European Council on Foreign Relations — have consistently found that post-authoritarian fracture along loyalist/opposition lines is more dangerous when the incumbent security apparatus remains armed and the opposition lacks unified leadership. Iran's situation is complicated further by the absence of a credible domestic opposition organisation capable of channelling either crowd toward a political process.

The coexistence of mourning and celebration in the same city simultaneously is a diagnostic indicator of what transitional justice scholars call a 'contested legitimacy' environment, in which neither side accepts the other's right to define the national narrative.

Sources:Middle East Eye·Iran International

Mentions:Qom →National Security Council (Iran) →United Nations Security Council (UNSC) →Karaj →European Council on Foreign Relations →Iran-Iraq War →Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC) →Basij →Iran →Tehran →Middle East Eye →

First Reported In

Update #5 · Bread lines and IRGC fear inside Iran

Middle East Eye· 1 Mar 2026

Read original →

Causes and effects

Caused by

Iran confirms Khamenei killed by Israel

Confirmation of Khamenei's death generated both celebrations and pro-regime mourning — polarised domestic response

Occurred 1 Mar 2026

Read story →

This Event

Mourning and fireworks on Iran streets

The simultaneous mourning and celebrating reveals that Iran's population is deeply fractured along lines that predate the strikes, complicating any narrative — Western or Iranian government — that claims to speak for 'the Iranian people' as a whole.

Different Perspectives

NATO eastern flank (B9 + Nordics)

The B9+Nordic Bucharest joint statement on 13 May reaffirmed Ukraine's sovereignty within internationally recognised borders and backed NATO eastern flank reinforcement; the summit accepted Zelenskyy's bilateral drone deal proposal as a structural alternative to the stalled US export approval pathway, treating it as a European defence architecture question rather than aid delivery.

IAEA / Rafael Grossi

Grossi is still negotiating a sixth ZNPP repair ceasefire with no agreement after 50 days of 750 kV line disconnection; the 3 May ERCL drone strike that destroyed environmental monitoring equipment represents a qualitative escalation in infrastructure degradation that the IAEA has documented but cannot compel either party to halt.

Péter Magyar / Hungary

Magyar's incoming foreign minister pledged on 12 May that Hungary will stop abusing EU veto rights; the pledge is a statement of intent rather than a binding legal commitment, and Magyar's MEPs voted against the €90 billion loan as recently as April, while a planned referendum on Ukraine's EU accession preserves a downstream blocking lever.

EU Council and European Commission

The Magyar cabinet formation on 12 May removes the Hungary veto that had blocked the €9.1 billion first tranche since February; the Commission is now coordinating the three-document disbursement package for an early-June vote. The structural blocker is gone; the disbursement question is now scheduling, not politics.

Donald Trump / White House

Trump announced a 9-11 May three-day ceasefire with a 1,000-for-1,000 prisoner exchange attached, then called peace 'getting very close' on 11-13 May while Russia's 800-drone barrage was under way; his public framing adopted Russian diplomatic language without securing any Russian operational concession or verifying the exchange was agreed.

Vladimir Putin / Kremlin

Putin told reporters on 9 May the war is 'coming to an end' while Peskov confirmed on 13 May that territorial demands are unchanged and Russia requires full Ukrainian withdrawal from all four annexed regions; the verbal accommodation costs Moscow nothing and conditions any summit on a pre-finalised treaty Kyiv cannot accept.