Skip to content
You can now search across every topic, entity and event.What's new
Is Britain Actually Broke?
20AUG

Mayors to get 6% to 9% of income tax

2 min read
17:53UTC

The Institute for Fiscal Studies says assigning 6% to 9% of local income-tax revenue to England's mayors from April 2028 would hand them funding clarity and a risk they cannot manage.

EconomicDeveloping
Key takeaway

The IFS warns mayoral income-tax assignment from 2028 would move revenue risk to authorities that cannot control it.

The Institute for Fiscal Studies (IFS), an independent economics research institute, responded on 6 August 2026 to government plans to assign between 6% and 9% of local income-tax revenue to England's mayors from April 2028 1. The arrangement would replace the integrated settlements currently running in the North and the Midlands, under which central government hands a mayoral authority a single consolidated grant.

The Institute for Fiscal Studies sets one gain against one risk in the same response. Assignment gives an authority a longer view of its funding than annual grant settlements allow, which makes multi-year commitments possible. It also exposes that authority to swings in receipts driven by employment, wages and national tax policy, none of which a mayor sets 2. Assignment is not devolution of the tax itself: rates and thresholds would stay in Westminster, while the yield would land locally.

For this desk the arrangement matters as a channel rather than as a policy. Local government distress has come through grant shortfalls and emergency support so far, with 36 councils granted £1.74bn of Exceptional Financial Support for 2026-27 . Assigned income tax adds a second channel that moves with the economic cycle, and it arrives on a date nearly two years out, which is long enough that the size of the sums involved will be set by circumstances nobody can currently observe.

Deep Analysis

In plain English

Regional mayors in England, such as those covering Greater Manchester or the West Midlands, currently receive government funding through a fixed grant settlement. From April 2028, the government plans to replace some of that with a share, 6% to 9%, of the income tax collected in their area instead. That change means a mayor's funding would rise or fall with how much income tax people in the area actually pay, rather than being fixed in advance. The Institute for Fiscal Studies, a research body that analyses tax and spending policy, says this gives more long-term certainty but also more exposure to local ups and downs the mayor cannot control.

Deep Analysis
Root Causes

The IFS's own figures show why the volatility risk falls unevenly: income-tax revenue per person currently varies by more than 3.5 times between Greater London and the West Midlands.

A tax-share model ties each mayoral authority's funding to its own local income-tax base, so authorities in lower-revenue areas would see their funding move more with local economic conditions than authorities in higher-revenue areas, even under an identical percentage share.

What could happen next?
  • Consequence

    Authorities in lower income-tax-base areas would see their mayoral funding move more with local economic conditions than authorities in higher-revenue areas, under the same percentage share.

First Reported In

Update #2 · Three household registers, three answers

Institute for Fiscal Studies· 20 Aug 2026
Read original
Different Perspectives
A Treasury official weighing pre-committed claims
A Treasury official weighing pre-committed claims
The triple lock costed at GBP15.5bn a year by 2029-30 and roughly GBP25bn a year of unfunded defence commitment sit on the sovereign balance sheet regardless of which household register looks best this month. The 28 October forecast, not this week's releases, is where those claims get priced.
A council finance officer awaiting mayoral tax devolution
A council finance officer awaiting mayoral tax devolution
The IFS's warning that assigning 6% to 9% of local income-tax revenue to mayors from April 2028 shifts revenue risk onto authorities that cannot control the tax base concerns every council balance sheet, including those currently comfortable. A council cannot smooth an income-tax downturn the way the Treasury can.
A mortgage lender reading UK Finance's own book
A mortgage lender reading UK Finance's own book
Arrears fell 1% and possessions fell 8% in the second quarter, on both homeowner and buy-to-let books. Fewer households lost a home this quarter than last, and that is the register that measures actual loss rather than a formal-procedure count that includes unsecured debt.
A defined-benefit pension scheme trustee
A defined-benefit pension scheme trustee
The PPF's 7800 index reaching 133.0% funded, a GBP271.3bn surplus across 4,838 schemes, is the strongest position this desk has recorded for the index. A member's pension is more secure than it was a month ago, whatever is happening to household insolvency figures elsewhere.
An investor bidding at the gilt auction
An investor bidding at the gilt auction
Three auctions clearing at bid-to-cover ratios of 3.34 to 3.65, alongside Fitch's AA- affirmation, say the state's own creditworthiness is unchanged. Demand for UK debt three to four times over is not consistent with a sovereign in distress, whatever the household ledger shows.
A household in work and running down its buffer
A household in work and running down its buffer
The insolvency rate reaching 27.8 per 10,000, 2.2 short of the declared trigger, is the reading that matters, because a savings ratio at 8.9% and real pay growth of 0.1% leave no margin for a bad month. Falling mortgage arrears say nothing about a household with no mortgage.