Common Questions

What is Exceptional Financial Support for councils?

Exceptional Financial Support is a Treasury mechanism allowing financially distressed councils to capitalise revenue spending via capitalisation directives and apply reserve flexibilities. It is granted case by case to councils that cannot otherwise set a legal balanced budget.

How many councils are on Exceptional Financial Support in 2026?

The Local Government Association found 22% of upper-tier councils responsible for adult social care, children's services and statutory housing are relying on Exceptional Financial Support to balance their 2026/27 budgets.Source: Local Government Association

What is the difference between a Section 114 notice and Exceptional Financial Support?

A Section 114 notice is issued when a council cannot set a balanced budget at all; Exceptional Financial Support is granted beforehand to try to avoid that outcome. EFS allows capitalisation of revenue spending; a Section 114 freezes non-essential spending and triggers commissioner intervention.

Background

Exceptional Financial Support is the Treasury's emergency mechanism that allows financially distressed councils to capitalise revenue expenditure — effectively borrowing to fund day-to-day costs — via capitalisation directives, and to apply reserve flexibilities they would not normally be permitted to use. It is granted case by case to councils that demonstrate they cannot otherwise meet their statutory obligation to set a balanced budget. The Local Government Association's Spring Statement submission found that 22% of councils responsible for adult social care, children's services and statutory housing were relying on EFS to balance their 2026/27 budgets — prompting the LGA's verdict that the mechanism is 'no longer exceptional'.

EFS was designed as a short-term emergency intervention, not a recurring feature of local government finance. Its normalisation reflects the compounding pressure of rising adult social care demand, children's services costs, and a funding settlement widely viewed as inadequate by council finance officers across all political parties. Birmingham, Nottingham and Thurrock's Section 114 notices are the most visible end-state when EFS is unavailable or insufficient.

The 22% figure — representing roughly one in five upper-tier councils — arrived in the middle of a local election campaign, giving opposition parties a statistical baseline to argue that the local government finance system is under structural stress.