Skip to content
Iran Conflict 2026
8MAR

Oil swings $30 in a single session

2 min read
13:29UTC

Brent hit $119.50 — the highest since 2012 — then crashed below $90 on a single presidential comment. The most volatile crude session in decades reveals a market trading on words, not barrels.

ConflictDeveloping

Brent Crude hit $119.50 per barrel on Monday morning — the highest since 2022 and a 77% rise from $67.41 on 27 February, the day the war began. WTI reached $119.48. By the US close, Brent had settled at $98.96, sinking below $90 in after-hours trading. WTI settled at $94.77. The $30 intraday reversal was driven by Trump's 'very soon' language on ending the war and profit-taking on overcrowded long positions.

The $30 swing dwarfs normal oil market volatility. Brent's average daily range through 2025 was approximately $2. Even during the 2020 pandemic price collapse, intraday moves rarely exceeded $10. Last Friday, US crude futures posted a 35.63% weekly gain — the largest since the contract began trading in 1983 . Qatar's energy minister warned of $150 per barrel if Hormuz remains closed . The market touched $119 and flinched — but the flinch was triggered by a presidential remark, not by any change in the physical supply picture. Brent had been at $116.08 just three days ago , itself a 72% rise in under two weeks. The 1990 Iraqi invasion of Kuwait doubled oil prices over two months; this war achieved the same effect in ten days and then gave back a third of it in an afternoon.

The underlying supply disruption has not changed. Tanker traffic through Hormuz remains down approximately 70%. Kuwait's force majeure removed 300,000 barrels per day from export markets. Combined with Iraq's curtailments of approximately 1.5 million barrels per day, roughly 3.5 million barrels per day of Gulf production capacity is shut in or unable to reach market. No tanker insurance has been restored. No diplomatic off-ramp for Hormuz has materialised. The fundamental imbalance — supply removed, demand unchanged — is identical to what it was at $119 in the morning. What moved was sentiment, and sentiment moved on words.

The question for Tuesday's Asian open is whether $90 or $100 becomes the new floor. If $90 holds, the oil shock remains a market event — painful but absorbable for import-dependent economies, even those already strained (South Korea's KOSPI triggered two circuit breakers in four sessions, . If $100 holds, it crosses into macroeconomic damage: compressed industrial margins, inflationary pressure on food and transport costs across Asia and Europe, and political pressure on governments to release strategic petroleum reserves or seek bilateral supply deals outside The Gulf. The market is not pricing oil. It is pricing the probability that one man's 'very soon' means what it says.

First Reported In

Update #31 · Iran moves to heavy warheads; China deploys

Euronews· 10 Mar 2026
Read original
Different Perspectives
South Korean financial markets
South Korean financial markets
South Korea, which imports virtually all its crude oil, is absorbing the war's economic transmission most acutely among non-belligerents. The second KOSPI circuit breaker in four sessions — with Samsung down over 10% and SK Hynix down 12.3% — reflects an industrial economy unable to reprice energy costs that have risen 72% in ten days. The market response indicates Korean industry cannot sustain oil above $100 per barrel without margin compression across manufacturing, semiconductors, and shipping.
Migrant worker communities in the Gulf
Migrant worker communities in the Gulf
The first confirmed civilian deaths in Saudi Arabia — one Indian and one Bangladeshi killed, twelve Bangladeshis wounded — fell on communities with no voice in the military decisions that placed them in harm's way. Migrant workers live near military installations because that housing is affordable, not by choice. Bangladesh and India face the dilemma of needing to protect nationals who cannot easily leave a war zone while depending on Gulf remittances that fund a substantial share of their domestic economies.
Azerbaijan — President Ilham Aliyev
Azerbaijan — President Ilham Aliyev
Aliyev treats the Nakhchivan strikes as a direct act of war against Azerbaijani sovereignty, placing armed forces on full combat readiness and demanding an Iranian explanation. The response is calibrated to maximise international sympathy while stopping short of military retaliation — Baku cannot fight Iran alone and needs either Turkish or NATO backing to credibly deter further strikes.
Oil-importing nations (Japan, South Korea, India)
Oil-importing nations (Japan, South Korea, India)
The Hormuz closure is an existential threat. Japan, South Korea, and India receive the majority of their crude through the strait — they will bear the heaviest economic cost of a war they had no part in.
Global South governments (Indonesia, Brazil, South Africa)
Global South governments (Indonesia, Brazil, South Africa)
Neutrality was possible when the targets were military. 148 dead schoolgirls made it impossible — no government can explain that away to its own citizens.
Turkey
Turkey
Has absorbed three Iranian ballistic missile interceptions since 4 March without invoking NATO Article 5 consultation. Each incident narrows Ankara's political room to continue absorbing without Alliance-level response.