Skip to content
You can now search across every topic, entity and event.What's new
Iran Conflict 2026
11SEP

Brent hits two-month low on deal bets

3 min read
09:25UTC

Brent crude traded near $87.33 on 12 June, a near-two-month low, as futures markets priced roughly an 80 per cent chance the Iran deal closes.

ConflictDeveloping
Key takeaway

Traders priced an 80 per cent chance of an unsigned deal, leaving Brent exposed to a sharp rebound.

Brent Crude, the global oil benchmark, traded near $87.33 on 12 June, a near-two-month low and down about 6 per cent on the week, even as The White House register the market is betting on showed no signature. 1 Futures traders are pricing roughly an 80 per cent chance the Iran deal closes, a senior US official's figure, which means they are discounting the unsigned register almost entirely. 2

The fall was a step-down, not a slide: $96.34 on 10 June , $94.71 on 11 June , $89.25 on 12 June , now below $88. In three sessions the benchmark gave back the entire high it set on Hormuz risk. Traders, not diplomats, are the most confident actors that a deal they cannot see will close, discounting the blockade, the drone combat and the IRGC's review hedge on a bet that Hormuz reopens soon.

The confidence cuts one way. A near-two-month low feeds through to softer fuel and freight costs for importers within weeks if the move holds. But with 80 per cent already in the price, the market holds little cushion: a Vahidi re-suspension or a slipped signing would reprice Hormuz risk sharply and snap Brent back above $90, because the good news has been spent before the paper exists.

Deep Analysis

In plain English

Oil is priced on expectations as much as on actual supply. When traders think a conflict that has been disrupting Middle East oil supply is close to ending, the price falls before a single extra barrel flows. On 12 June, with news of a possible deal circulating, the price of Brent crude, the main global oil benchmark, fell to around $87.33, its lowest in nearly two months. Markets were pricing in about an 80 per cent chance the deal would close and the Strait of Hormuz would reopen. But that calculation rests on an unsigned document and unresolved disagreements: where Iran's enriched uranium goes and whether Iran's most powerful military force, the IRGC, has agreed to the deal at all. If those problems cause a delay, the price will jump back up sharply.

What could happen next?
  • Risk

    Brent near $87.33 on an unsigned deal means a single negative signal, a Vahidi re-suspension or a public IRGC contradiction, would produce a $5-$8 upward snap in one trading session.

    Immediate · Assessed
  • Opportunity

    If Hormuz fully reopens and Iran's 67 million stranded barrels clear, Brent could settle in the $80-$83 band within six to eight weeks, reducing fuel and freight inflation across oil-importing economies.

    Medium term · Suggested
  • Consequence

    Lloyd's of London has not de-listed Hormuz from its war-risk register despite the price drop; insurance premiums remain elevated and shipping diversions at 139 vessels continue regardless of futures pricing.

    Short term · Reported
First Reported In

Update #126 · The weekend signing that never reached paper

oilprice.com· 13 Jun 2026
Read original
Causes and effects
This Event
Brent hits two-month low on deal bets
Traders have priced a deal the White House register has not confirmed. With 80 per cent already in the price, the downside is asymmetric: a slipped signing snaps Brent back above $90.
Different Perspectives
Turkey
Turkey
Golden Global Portfoy Yonetimi closed three funds to new money a day after telling regulators they were legally separate from its sanctioned parent, and the central bank held its rate at 37 per cent citing energy-driven inflation risk. Ankara is absorbing balance-sheet and monetary costs from a war it is not fighting.
Qatar
Qatar
Qatar's foreign ministry said it was coordinating with China during a Beijing visit to restart negotiations, while filing hundreds of letters at the UN documenting Iranian strikes on its own civilian facilities. Doha is mediating for a neighbour it is also formally accusing, a contradiction the referral's clean vote count does not show.
China and Russia
China and Russia
China and Russia voted against the IAEA referral alongside Niger, and Iran's ambassador told the Board that inspections were impossible during a war Iran did not start. Beijing is separately mediating between Doha and Tehran, meaning the same power blocking the West's legal track is running the diplomatic one that might actually end the war.
Jordan
Jordan
Jordan said it intercepted 18 of the 20 Iranian ballistic missiles fired at its territory on 8 September, the war's first sustained salvo against a state that is not a combatant. Amman's 90 per cent interception rate held, but a tenfold jump in missiles fired in a single volley raises what the next one might carry.
United States
United States
CENTCOM said its strikes disabled five Iranian tankers only after two failed missile attempts on a US warship, and Treasury moved the same week to a presumption of denial on all Iran licences. Washington now treats commercial shipping and financial plumbing as one enforcement front rather than two separate tracks.
Iran / IRGC
Iran / IRGC
Iran's foreign ministry called the CENTCOM tanker strikes a war crime and a breach of the UN Charter, while the IRGC named two US destroyers it says it damaged without releasing images. Tehran expects the claims, unverifiable either way, to sustain domestic morale after losing five tankers in a single day.