Skip to content
You can now search across every topic, entity and event.What's new
Iran Conflict 2026
3SEP

Brent jumps 7%, rial hits record low

2 min read
16:40UTC

Brent crude spiked almost 7% intraday to $97.47 on 1 June after Iran suspended talks, settling at $94.98; the rial hit a record 1,746,000 to the dollar as Lloyd's held its Hormuz war-risk line.

ConflictDeveloping
Key takeaway

Oil and the rial both moved on Iran's walkout, yet Lloyd's kept Hormuz war-risk locked.

Brent Crude, the global oil benchmark, spiked almost 7% intraday to $97.47 on Monday 1 June once Iran suspended talks, its highest since the $98.83 Bandar Abbas bounce on 26 May , yet it settled lower at $94.98, up 4.2% on the day, as the Lebanon ceasefire pared the gain 1. The jump came on a formal Iranian diplomatic act, not a missile, so the risk premium now tracks the negotiating table rather than the battlefield. A 7% move translates to roughly 12 to 15p a litre for UK drivers within a fortnight.

The Iranian rial hit a record 1,746,000 to the dollar on Iran's open market by 2 June, from 1,705,000 on 31 May , a 2.4% depreciation in two days that accelerated after the suspension 2. Imported food, medicine and fuel cost more in rial overnight, and for Iranians on fixed wages savings erode in days. The same Iranian act split the two markets: Brent rallied while the rial fell, because traders read deal-breakdown risk where ordinary Iranians read a worsening economy.

Lloyd's of London kept its Hormuz war-risk designation unchanged , holding the two-market split that has run since the conflict began. Lloyd's Joint War Committee can de-list the strait of Hormuz only on a UN Security Council resolution or a government certification letter, a structural trigger no sentiment can shift; futures, by contrast, price the odds of a press release. So crude can rally on a thaw while marine insurance stays frozen, because the two answer to different triggers.

Deep Analysis

In plain English

Two different markets were tracking the same conflict on 1 June and reached opposite conclusions. The oil futures market, where traders bet on the price of crude oil, drove Brent crude up by nearly 7% when Iran suspended talks, then back down when the Lebanon ceasefire was announced, ending the day 4.2% higher. Oil futures respond to headlines within minutes because traders can buy or sell in seconds. Lloyd's of London, founded in London in 1688, runs the specialist market that insures ships against war damage. It left its high-cost 'war-risk' designation on the Strait of Hormuz unchanged, as it has throughout the conflict. Lloyd's cannot de-list Hormuz just because a ceasefire looks possible; it needs a formal UN Security Council resolution or a government certification letter. None has arrived. The result is that oil traders think the risk is easing while the insurers who cover the actual ships think nothing has changed. The Iranian rial (Iran's currency) fell to a record low of 1,746,000 per dollar on Iran's open market by 2 June. That means ordinary Iranians buying imported food, medicine or electronics face rapidly rising prices, regardless of what diplomats are negotiating.

Deep Analysis
Root Causes

The Lloyd's/futures split has a specific institutional cause: Lloyd's Joint War Committee operates on the basis of 'listed areas' that require a formal government certification process to de-list. That process requires either a UN Security Council resolution certifying the end of hostilities, or a letter from a government with jurisdiction over the area.

Neither the US government, which runs the blockade, nor Iran, which controls the strait, has issued such a letter. With Russia and China vetoing any UNSC resolution, the bureaucratic unlock is structurally blocked for the duration of the conflict. This is not risk-model inertia; it is a deliberate institutional design that was built after the 1988 Tanker War specifically to prevent Lloyd's from being repriced by political headlines rather than verified security conditions.

First Reported In

Update #115 · Iran moves first, Trump moves by phone

CBS News· 2 Jun 2026
Read original
Different Perspectives
China's foreign ministry
China's foreign ministry
Spokesman Lin Jian rejected Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent's 25 August warning that Iranian oil buyers face an "economic D-Day", saying sanctions do not help and that Beijing would safeguard its own rights and interests. China's Iranian crude imports had already halved for unrelated reasons.
Iraq's government and Erbil authorities
Iraq's government and Erbil authorities
Erbil authorities said 10 explosive-laden drones were shot down over the city on 1-2 September with no casualties. Iraq's government condemned the attacks without naming Iran as their source, and neither Washington nor Baghdad confirmed the IRGC's claim to have hit US bases there.
Bahrain Defence Force
Bahrain Defence Force
The General Command said air defences intercepted several Iranian missiles and drones on 1-2 September and called the use of such weapons against civilians and private property a flagrant violation of international humanitarian law.
Kuwait's Fire Force and foreign ministry
Kuwait's Fire Force and foreign ministry
KUNA reported a hostile Iranian drone struck a residential complex in Kuwait City on 2 September; Fire Force spokesman Brigadier General Mohammad Al-Gharib said losses were confined to property. Kuwait's foreign ministry called the attack a clear breach of its sovereignty.
Jordan's Armed Forces
Jordan's Armed Forces
Petra carried a statement that air defences intercepted eight missiles violating Jordanian airspace early on 31 August and 10 of 13 fired on 1 September. The statement named no target and did not address the IRGC's claim to have struck Camp Titin and killed US personnel.
CENTCOM
CENTCOM
CENTCOM's 1 September target list named IRGC air defence, radar, maritime and mine-laying sites in Iran but no tanker, after Axios reported anonymous officials describing a Trump-approved "tanker for tanker" drone policy. A CENTCOM spokesman declined to confirm the policy and referred questions to policymakers.