Skip to content
You can now search across every topic, entity and event.What's new
Iran Conflict 2026
7AUG

Brent slips to $98.38 on talks reports

1 min read
12:08UTC

Brent crude closed at $98.38 a barrel on 24 July, down 2.29 per cent, one day after crossing $100 for the first time since May. Reports of reviving mediation did the work.

ConflictDeveloping
Key takeaway

Brent gave back its move above $100 within a day, on mediation reports rather than any signed agreement.

Brent Crude, the global benchmark for seaborne oil, settled at $98.38 a barrel on 24 July, down 2.29 per cent, as reports circulated that mediation between Washington and Tehran was reviving 1. The fall came a day after the contract crossed $100 for the first time since May .

Donald Trump spent 24 July telling Axios he was weighing a larger operation, and the price still fell. Traders priced the pause rather than the promise: a quiet night over Iranian airspace and mediation chatter around the Iraqi channel moved the benchmark down more than two per cent in a session, while the rhetoric moved it not at all.

Roughly a fifth of the world's seaborne crude passes through the Strait of Hormuz, so the conflict premium embedded in that $98.38 is a function of shipping risk rather than of barrels lost to date. The 24 July session showed that premium responding to diplomatic signals, which matters to refiners hedging cargoes and to Gulf producers setting budgets against a number that can move two dollars on a report neither government has confirmed.

Deep Analysis

In plain English

Brent crude is the main global price used for oil bought and sold by sea, and it affects what people pay for petrol and heating. It dropped by about 2 per cent on 24 July, to $98.38 a barrel, after reports suggested that US and Iranian mediators were talking again. The day before, the price had gone above $100 for the first time since May. Oil traders tend to react quickly to any hint of peace talks in this war, even before anyone confirms whether the talks are real, so prices can jump around a lot on rumour alone.

What could happen next?
  • Consequence

    A one-day price fall on mediation rumours, rather than a confirmed diplomatic breakthrough, leaves Brent vulnerable to snapping back if the reports prove unfounded.

First Reported In

Update #161 · Bahrain and Kuwait struck Iran, WSJ reports

Trading Economics· 25 Jul 2026
Read original
Different Perspectives
Shipping and insurance industry
Shipping and insurance industry
UKMTO counted about 20 US-facilitated Hormuz transits a day to 11 September against only 6 visible on AIS, with traffic still around 90% below the 138-a-day pre-war baseline. War-risk underwriters cannot price hulls they cannot see, or resolve whether the tanker El Gaia hit a mine, as Iran claims, or a missile and drone, as CENTCOM says.
European refiners
European refiners
European refiners, including Poland's Orlen, absorbed a roughly $26 gap between Dated Brent at $130.80 on 15 September and ICE Brent futures settling at $103.87 on 18 September, a spread that widened from $13.45 on 9 September rather than newly opening. Their futures hedges no longer cover what they now pay for physical barrels.
Saudi Arabia
Saudi Arabia
Saudi Aramco zeroed European term customers' October allocations and rerouted roughly 60 million barrels to Asia through Ras Tanura and Sohar, using Red Sea and Gulf terminal capacity built years ago to cut Hormuz exposure. Riyadh reallocated existing supply rather than negotiating a shortfall with Europe.
Qatar
Qatar
Qatar's energy minister Saad al-Kaabi told Bloomberg at the Qatar Economic Forum on 20 September that Bessent's two-year Hormuz-obsolescence forecast is wrong, and that Doha has deliberately built no bypass pipeline. Qatar's gas exports run through one waterway by choice, not oversight.
Iran (foreign ministry and Majlis)
Iran (foreign ministry and Majlis)
Iran's foreign ministry and 130 Majlis deputies moved toward NPT withdrawal this week, with lawmaker Hossein-Ali Haji Deligani filing a triple-urgency bill on 20 September that Speaker Qalibaf has not yet scheduled. Tehran treats treaty membership as leverage still on the table, not yet spent.
Russia and China
Russia and China
Moscow and Beijing vetoed the Panel of Experts' renewal, maintaining Resolution 2231 lapsed in October 2025 and the 2025 snapback was never validly triggered, so the sanctions architecture the Panel enforces has no current legal standing. Both governments frame the veto as upholding law, not shielding Tehran.