Skip to content
You can now search across every topic, entity and event.What's new
Iran Conflict 2026
6AUG

Trading desks stretch to 21-hour days

2 min read
15:43UTC

European energy trading hours have more than doubled from 10 to 21 hours as volatility forces round-the-clock coverage.

← Back to Two Hormuz deals, neither one publishedJump to analysis ↓
ConflictDeveloping
Key takeaway

Trading hours doubled to 21 per day; bank forecasts diverge by EUR 30/MWh on Hormuz timing.

European gas and power trading hours are extending from 10 to 21 hours per day, according to Bloomberg, a structural adaptation to sustained market volatility. The extension reflects the reality that price-moving events (Hormuz threats, ceasefire announcements, force majeure declarations) arrive outside traditional European trading hours, and desks that are not staffed miss the move.

Standard Chartered forecast TTF could breach the EUR eighty mark if the conflict remains unresolved at summer injection start. Goldman Sachs forecast Q2 TTF at EUR 50/MWh, but that assumes Hormuz normalisation by mid-April, an assumption already overtaken by events. That forecast gap captures the market's fundamental uncertainty: whether the strait reopens in weeks or months is the single variable that separates a manageable injection season from another winter of extreme price spikes.

Deep Analysis

In plain English

European gas and electricity traders are now working much longer days. The markets that allow energy companies, utilities, and industrials to buy and sell gas and power have extended their operating hours from 10 to 21 hours per day. This is because prices are moving so sharply, driven by news about the Hormuz disruption, that participants need more time to respond and manage their risk positions. Standard Chartered bank thinks prices could reach EUR 80/MWh if the disruption continues into summer. Goldman Sachs predicted EUR 50/MWh, but its forecast assumed Hormuz would normalise by mid-April, which has not happened.

Deep Analysis
Root Causes

The shift from 10 to 21 hours of trading reflects a practical response to a structural change in the volatility regime: when geopolitical events can move prices by EUR 5-10/MWh in a single session, and those events arrive on Middle Eastern time zones (which are 2-4 hours ahead of European market open), market participants face unhedgeable overnight gap risk under a 10-hour trading window.

Extended hours reduce the overnight gap risk by allowing participants to react to news as it emerges, but they also require 24-hour desk coverage for energy trading operations, increasing operational costs for smaller trading firms and potentially concentrating market activity among larger participants with the infrastructure to maintain extended desks.

What could happen next?
  • Risk

    Goldman Sachs's EUR 50/MWh Q2 forecast was conditioned on Hormuz normalisation by mid-April. With that deadline passed, a Goldman forecast revision upward would signal that consensus market expectations are moving toward the Standard Chartered EUR 80+/MWh scenario.

  • Consequence

    Extended trading hours concentrate market-making capacity among larger institutions, potentially reducing liquidity during off-peak trading windows and widening bid-ask spreads for smaller energy buyers.

Sources:Bloomberg·OilPrice.com / Standard Chartered·OilPrice.com / Standard Chartered
Mentions:Standard Chartered →Goldman Sachs →Bloomberg →Prima →Russia →Ukraine →TTF →
First Reported In

Update #1 · Europe's thinnest gas cushion since 2018

Bloomberg· 13 Apr 2026
Read original →
Causes and effects
This Event
Trading desks stretch to 21-hour days
The operational shift from 10 to 21-hour trading days is a structural adaptation that increases staffing costs and operational risk across every European energy trading desk.
Led to
TTF trades at EUR 42.26 on ceasefire hope
TTF decline to EUR 42 represents the lower bound of the Standard Chartered EUR 80+ warning range, with the gap dependent on whether the ceasefire holds through late April.
Occurred 15 Apr 2026
Read story →
Different Perspectives
Turkiye
Turkiye
Erdogan followed the Pakistani delegation to Jeddah for an instrument that has not been signed. Ankara's entry widens Saudi Arabia's defence architecture beyond the existing Pakistan pact, adding a second non-Gulf military partner mid-conflict.
Oman
Oman
Muscat is the corridor's broker but has published nothing about the arrangement Fars describes on its behalf. The account leaves Oman administering outbound traffic only, a narrower role than the shared route its mediation has rested on since 1979.
Pakistan
Pakistan
Islamabad sent Sharif, Munir and Dar to Jeddah to widen a defence commitment it has honoured in cheaper registers since March, when Dar invoked the Saudi mutual defence pact. Jeddah tests whether that hedge becomes a binding trilateral instrument with Turkiye.
United States
United States
Washington rejected the Majlis Hormuz bill outright while CENTCOM's own tally kept climbing to 49 vessels redirected since 14 July. Both instruments tightened in the same week Trump promised the strait would reopen soon.
Iran
Iran
Iran's foreign ministry is selling a phased Hormuz corridor through Oman and denying any percentage cargo tariff, while its own Majlis is legislating fines to 20% and a bar on Israeli-linked cargo. The two accounts, from the same government, do not agree with each other.
Saudi Arabia
Saudi Arabia
Riyadh published a target forecast, not an attribution, for the campaign it says the Najran strike previewed. That keeps an Article 51 case available while it formalises a trilateral defence architecture with Pakistan and Turkiye.