Skip to content
You can now search across every topic, entity and event.What's new
Iran Conflict 2026
26JUL

Brent clears $87 as Hormuz traffic thins

2 min read
12:01UTC

Brent crude traded above $87 a barrel on 17 July, up more than 14 per cent on the week, while transits through the Strait of Hormuz fell to eight vessels and war-risk premiums reached 3 to 10 per cent of hull value.

ConflictDeveloping
Key takeaway

Brent passed $87 as Hormuz transits fell to eight vessels and war-risk cover reached 10 per cent.

Brent Crude traded above $87 a barrel on Friday 17 July, a one-month high and a rise of more than 14 per cent on the week 1. Transits through the Strait of Hormuz fell to eight vessels on 16 July, down from 15 the day before and against a pre-war baseline above 100 2. Roughly a fifth of the world's seaborne oil normally passes through that channel.

War-risk premiums, the surcharge underwriters levy for sailing dangerous waters, now run at 3 to 10 per cent of hull value against 0.25 per cent before the war 3. An owner who paid $250,000 to insure a $100m hull through the strait is now quoted between $3m and $10m for the same passage, which exceeds what most single cargoes earn. No physical barrier has been placed across the water. the strait shuts on an underwriter's spreadsheet before it shuts on anything else, and the IRGC's mining claim of 18 July, which CENTCOM called false , moves that spreadsheet whether or not a single mine is ever recovered.

That asymmetry favours Tehran. Laying enough ordnance to physically close Hormuz is beyond what Iran can sustain under nightly bombardment; making insurers behave as though it might is not. Tehran can assert a minefield for the price of a broadcast, and the premium moves on the assertion.

Deep Analysis

In plain English

The price of oil jumped to its highest level in a month, and the number of ships passing through the Strait of Hormuz fell sharply, because insurance companies are charging shipowners far more to sail through the strait than they were before the war. That insurance surcharge, called a war risk premium, has gone from a quarter of one per cent of a ship's value to as much as 10 per cent, which on a $100 million ship can mean paying $10 million just to insure one voyage. Shipowners are choosing not to sail rather than pay that much, which is why fewer ships are passing through even though no one has physically blocked the strait.

Deep Analysis
Root Causes

The Joint War Committee's Listed Areas system exists because individual underwriters cannot each independently assess mine risk in real time; they delegate that judgement to a committee that reviews the area periodically rather than continuously.

That institutional lag is the actual mechanism Iran's unconfirmed mining claim exploits: the claim does not need to be true, it needs only to be plausible enough that the Committee does not remove Hormuz from its list, and removal happens on the Committee's schedule, not on a mine-clearance timetable.

What could happen next?
  • Meaning

    Iran can move global oil prices and shipping insurance by making a claim alone, without needing to sustain the physical capability to close the strait, so long as the claim is not immediately and conclusively disproven.

First Reported In

Update #156 · First American deaths in Jordan

Al Jazeera· 19 Jul 2026
Read original
Different Perspectives
Hormuz shipping and insurance market
Kpler, Lloyd's List and S&P Global each independently put Strait of Hormuz transits at a seventh to a sixth of pre-war levels, against CENTCOM's own position that the strait remains open for transit. War-risk premiums rose from 0.25% to 3-10% of hull value in mid-July and have held steady since.
Pakistan (with China)
Pakistan (with China)
Iran's interior minister met Pakistan's army chief in Islamabad on 25 July, his second visit in ten days, with China separately pushing the same track; Islamabad's stated precondition, a halt to Gulf attacks, broke within hours when the Houthis struck Yanbu and Jazan. The channel inherits Baghdad's opening without yet fixing what broke it.
Saudi Arabia
Saudi Arabia
Saudi Arabia absorbed Houthi strikes on Aramco-linked sites at Jazan and Yanbu on 25 July without confirming them, while holding a 30-year civil nuclear agreement Trump made conditional on joining the Abraham Accords two days after signing it. Riyadh is fighting on one front while being asked to concede on another.
Iran (state security leadership)
Iran (state security leadership)
Iran's security chief said strikes continue until the enemy's "total surrender", and no IRNA, Tasnim or Fars report carries any stand-down language to match Washington's pause. Tehran reads the halt as "strategic decision-making fatigue", not a restraint it needs to reciprocate.
Washington (Pentagon and White House)
Washington (Pentagon and White House)
A Defense Department source called the bombing halt "on a hold", Pentagon spokesman Sean Parnell insisted the US "retains a deep arsenal of capabilities", and the White House credited "successful sanctions" and thirteen days of strikes for the same pause. Three explanations from one government suggest none of them is the whole one.
Oil traders
Oil traders
Sent Brent down 2.29 per cent to $98.38 a barrel on reports that mediation was reviving, moving the price on CENTCOM's quiet night rather than on Trump's same-day promise of a bigger operation with no deadline attached.