Skip to content
You can now search across every topic, entity and event.What's new
Iran Conflict 2026
22JUL

Hegseth prices the war at $37.5bn

3 min read
12:09UTC

Pete Hegseth gave the Senate Appropriations Committee the first official cost of the Iran campaign, $37.5 billion, and no basis for what the number counts.

ConflictDeveloping
Key takeaway

Washington's first official price for the Iran war arrived with no accounting basis attached.

Pete Hegseth, the US Secretary of War, told the Senate Appropriations Committee on Tuesday 21 July that the Iran campaign has cost $37.5 billion so far, the first official figure Washington has attached to this war 1. He gave no accounting basis for it. Not obligated, not appropriated, not incremental: the number arrived bare, under questioning, with Joint Chiefs Chairman General Dan Caine sitting beside him.

The request the committee was examining had been on the table since 24 June. Russell Vought, director of the Office of Management and Budget (OMB), wrote to Speaker Mike Johnson that day asking for $87.6 billion, of which $67 billion is the Defence component covering Iran 2. An OMB letter is a request rather than a bill, and Congress has to draft and pass the appropriation itself. No markup or vote date has been set.

Reporting on the request describes $32.7 billion of it, roughly half, as direct war operations 3. No public itemisation of the remainder holds together as a breakdown, and the figures circulating for the individual lines do not reconcile against the total. Ranking member Patty Murray said the committee would not "rubber-stamp a request to bankroll this war", noting the department received over $1 trillion last year and is asking $1.3 trillion for the current fiscal year 4. Dick Durbin said the two witnesses "can't explain how this money is going to be spent" 5.

Washington has looked elsewhere for the money before. Donald Trump floated a 20% toll on Hormuz shipping in mid-July, then dropped it inside a day in favour of Gulf states investing billions in the United States in exchange for naval protection . Neither idea produced a dollar, and both left the bill where it started, with an appropriations committee that has now said aloud it cannot tell what it would be funding.

The timing sharpens the ask. Washington is being pressed to pay for naval protection of one chokepoint in the same week a second one closed to Saudi traffic at the cost of a transmitter.

Deep Analysis

In plain English

The US Defense Secretary, Pete Hegseth, told a Senate committee that fighting the war with Iran has cost $37.5 billion so far. This is the first time the US government has put an official price tag on the war. Hegseth did not explain what exactly that money paid for, and two senators on the committee said publicly that he and the top US general, Dan Caine, could not explain how the money had been or would be spent. Separately, the White House has already asked Congress for $67 billion more, as part of a bigger $87.6 billion request that also includes money for farmers and for an Ebola outbreak response. Congress has not yet voted on that request.

Deep Analysis
Root Causes

The $67 billion Defense component sits inside OMB Director Russell Vought's 24 June letter to Speaker Mike Johnson seeking $87.6 billion, which also bundles $11.1 billion in farm assistance, $1.4 billion for Ebola response, and smaller items for DC restoration and Penn Station modernisation, structurally raising the political cost of blocking war funding without also blocking unrelated domestic spending.

The itemised breakdown reported around the hearing does not reconcile with the headline ask: components cited as $32.7bn for direct operations, $21bn for munitions, $17.3bn for operations, and $12.1bn for classified programmes sum closer to $95.8 billion against a stated $67.1 billion request, leaving no single authoritative accounting of what the money actually covers.

What could happen next?
  • Consequence

    Without a committee markup or vote date set, the $67 billion Defense component of the supplemental request could stall in Congress through the current fiscal year, leaving war funding reliant on existing appropriations.

  • Risk

    Continued inability to reconcile itemised cost figures against the headline ask gives appropriators grounds to demand a formal accounting before releasing further funds.

First Reported In

Update #159 · A second strait closes by radio alone

Spectrum News· 22 Jul 2026
Read original
Different Perspectives
Jordan
Jordan
Jordan's armed forces downed three Iranian missiles on Tuesday with no casualties, a second successful interception since the 19 July strike on Muwaffaq Salti that killed three US service members. Amman has neither confirmed nor denied ISW's assessment that its intelligence sharing is a Russia-China cover story.
Operation Aspides
Operation Aspides
Operation Aspides has not needed to intervene against the Houthi Bab al-Mandab embargo: six vessels, including the Chinese VLCC Xin Long Yang, reversed course after radio hailing alone, with no vessel boarded, fired on or stopped by force.
Pete Hegseth, US Secretary of War
Pete Hegseth, US Secretary of War
Hegseth told the Senate Appropriations Committee the campaign has cost $37.5 billion so far, without saying whether the figure is obligated, appropriated or incremental. It is the first cost Washington has put on the war, arriving as OMB seeks $87.6 billion for the wider supplemental.
Iran's IRGC and Artesh
Iran's IRGC and Artesh
Iran's IRGC and Artesh reported destroying radar and Patriot installations at four Gulf bases on Tuesday night, the fifth dated iteration of the same claim against the same sites since 13 July. Neither Kuwait nor Bahrain has named or confirmed a single base as destroyed.
Saudi Arabia
Saudi Arabia
Riyadh has pressed Washington to end the Hormuz blockade specifically to remove Tehran's incentive for the Houthis to escalate Bab al-Mandab beyond radio warnings. It treats the embargo as coordinated pressure on Saudi shipping tied to the Hormuz campaign, not an independent Yemeni action.
Kuwait's Ministry of Electricity, Water and Renewable Energy and defence ministry
Kuwait's Ministry of Electricity, Water and Renewable Energy and defence ministry
Kuwait reported power and desalination stations struck for a fourth consecutive day and four cruise missiles plus 21 drones intercepted since dawn Wednesday, while its defence ministry statement used only the word interception, never destruction. Kuwait has confirmed no Iranian claim of a destroyed base.