Skip to content
You can now search across every topic, entity and event.What's new
Iran Conflict 2026
19JUL

Brent clears $87 as Hormuz traffic thins

2 min read
14:05UTC

Brent crude traded above $87 a barrel on 17 July, up more than 14 per cent on the week, while transits through the Strait of Hormuz fell to eight vessels and war-risk premiums reached 3 to 10 per cent of hull value.

ConflictDeveloping
Key takeaway

Brent passed $87 as Hormuz transits fell to eight vessels and war-risk cover reached 10 per cent.

Brent Crude traded above $87 a barrel on Friday 17 July, a one-month high and a rise of more than 14 per cent on the week 1. Transits through the Strait of Hormuz fell to eight vessels on 16 July, down from 15 the day before and against a pre-war baseline above 100 2. Roughly a fifth of the world's seaborne oil normally passes through that channel.

War-risk premiums, the surcharge underwriters levy for sailing dangerous waters, now run at 3 to 10 per cent of hull value against 0.25 per cent before the war 3. An owner who paid $250,000 to insure a $100m hull through the strait is now quoted between $3m and $10m for the same passage, which exceeds what most single cargoes earn. No physical barrier has been placed across the water. the strait shuts on an underwriter's spreadsheet before it shuts on anything else, and the IRGC's mining claim of 18 July, which CENTCOM called false , moves that spreadsheet whether or not a single mine is ever recovered.

That asymmetry favours Tehran. Laying enough ordnance to physically close Hormuz is beyond what Iran can sustain under nightly bombardment; making insurers behave as though it might is not. Tehran can assert a minefield for the price of a broadcast, and the premium moves on the assertion.

Deep Analysis

In plain English

The price of oil jumped to its highest level in a month, and the number of ships passing through the Strait of Hormuz fell sharply, because insurance companies are charging shipowners far more to sail through the strait than they were before the war. That insurance surcharge, called a war risk premium, has gone from a quarter of one per cent of a ship's value to as much as 10 per cent, which on a $100 million ship can mean paying $10 million just to insure one voyage. Shipowners are choosing not to sail rather than pay that much, which is why fewer ships are passing through even though no one has physically blocked the strait.

Deep Analysis
Root Causes

The Joint War Committee's Listed Areas system exists because individual underwriters cannot each independently assess mine risk in real time; they delegate that judgement to a committee that reviews the area periodically rather than continuously.

That institutional lag is the actual mechanism Iran's unconfirmed mining claim exploits: the claim does not need to be true, it needs only to be plausible enough that the Committee does not remove Hormuz from its list, and removal happens on the Committee's schedule, not on a mine-clearance timetable.

What could happen next?
  • Meaning

    Iran can move global oil prices and shipping insurance by making a claim alone, without needing to sustain the physical capability to close the strait, so long as the claim is not immediately and conclusively disproven.

First Reported In

Update #156 · First American deaths in Jordan

Al Jazeera· 19 Jul 2026
Read original
Different Perspectives
China's foreign ministry
China's foreign ministry
Spokesman Lin Jian rejected Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent's 25 August warning that Iranian oil buyers face an "economic D-Day", saying sanctions do not help and that Beijing would safeguard its own rights and interests. China's Iranian crude imports had already halved for unrelated reasons.
Iraq's government and Erbil authorities
Iraq's government and Erbil authorities
Erbil authorities said 10 explosive-laden drones were shot down over the city on 1-2 September with no casualties. Iraq's government condemned the attacks without naming Iran as their source, and neither Washington nor Baghdad confirmed the IRGC's claim to have hit US bases there.
Bahrain Defence Force
Bahrain Defence Force
The General Command said air defences intercepted several Iranian missiles and drones on 1-2 September and called the use of such weapons against civilians and private property a flagrant violation of international humanitarian law.
Kuwait's Fire Force and foreign ministry
Kuwait's Fire Force and foreign ministry
KUNA reported a hostile Iranian drone struck a residential complex in Kuwait City on 2 September; Fire Force spokesman Brigadier General Mohammad Al-Gharib said losses were confined to property. Kuwait's foreign ministry called the attack a clear breach of its sovereignty.
Jordan's Armed Forces
Jordan's Armed Forces
Petra carried a statement that air defences intercepted eight missiles violating Jordanian airspace early on 31 August and 10 of 13 fired on 1 September. The statement named no target and did not address the IRGC's claim to have struck Camp Titin and killed US personnel.
CENTCOM
CENTCOM
CENTCOM's 1 September target list named IRGC air defence, radar, maritime and mine-laying sites in Iran but no tanker, after Axios reported anonymous officials describing a Trump-approved "tanker for tanker" drone policy. A CENTCOM spokesman declined to confirm the policy and referred questions to policymakers.