Skip to content
You can now search across every topic, entity and event.What's new
Iran Conflict 2026
18JUL

Brent hits two-month low on deal bets

3 min read
13:17UTC

Brent crude traded near $87.33 on 12 June, a near-two-month low, as futures markets priced roughly an 80 per cent chance the Iran deal closes.

ConflictDeveloping
Key takeaway

Traders priced an 80 per cent chance of an unsigned deal, leaving Brent exposed to a sharp rebound.

Brent Crude, the global oil benchmark, traded near $87.33 on 12 June, a near-two-month low and down about 6 per cent on the week, even as The White House register the market is betting on showed no signature. 1 Futures traders are pricing roughly an 80 per cent chance the Iran deal closes, a senior US official's figure, which means they are discounting the unsigned register almost entirely. 2

The fall was a step-down, not a slide: $96.34 on 10 June , $94.71 on 11 June , $89.25 on 12 June , now below $88. In three sessions the benchmark gave back the entire high it set on Hormuz risk. Traders, not diplomats, are the most confident actors that a deal they cannot see will close, discounting the blockade, the drone combat and the IRGC's review hedge on a bet that Hormuz reopens soon.

The confidence cuts one way. A near-two-month low feeds through to softer fuel and freight costs for importers within weeks if the move holds. But with 80 per cent already in the price, the market holds little cushion: a Vahidi re-suspension or a slipped signing would reprice Hormuz risk sharply and snap Brent back above $90, because the good news has been spent before the paper exists.

Deep Analysis

In plain English

Oil is priced on expectations as much as on actual supply. When traders think a conflict that has been disrupting Middle East oil supply is close to ending, the price falls before a single extra barrel flows. On 12 June, with news of a possible deal circulating, the price of Brent crude, the main global oil benchmark, fell to around $87.33, its lowest in nearly two months. Markets were pricing in about an 80 per cent chance the deal would close and the Strait of Hormuz would reopen. But that calculation rests on an unsigned document and unresolved disagreements: where Iran's enriched uranium goes and whether Iran's most powerful military force, the IRGC, has agreed to the deal at all. If those problems cause a delay, the price will jump back up sharply.

What could happen next?
  • Risk

    Brent near $87.33 on an unsigned deal means a single negative signal, a Vahidi re-suspension or a public IRGC contradiction, would produce a $5-$8 upward snap in one trading session.

    Immediate · Assessed
  • Opportunity

    If Hormuz fully reopens and Iran's 67 million stranded barrels clear, Brent could settle in the $80-$83 band within six to eight weeks, reducing fuel and freight inflation across oil-importing economies.

    Medium term · Suggested
  • Consequence

    Lloyd's of London has not de-listed Hormuz from its war-risk register despite the price drop; insurance premiums remain elevated and shipping diversions at 139 vessels continue regardless of futures pricing.

    Short term · Reported
First Reported In

Update #126 · The weekend signing that never reached paper

oilprice.com· 13 Jun 2026
Read original
Causes and effects
This Event
Brent hits two-month low on deal bets
Traders have priced a deal the White House register has not confirmed. With 80 per cent already in the price, the downside is asymmetric: a slipped signing snaps Brent back above $90.
Different Perspectives
Jordan
Jordan
Jordan has not addressed the IRGC's claim that Jordanian civilians and soldiers supplied targeting intelligence for the 20 July Aqaba strike, even as its deputy prime minister received a condemnation call over Iran's earlier missile fire. The base has now produced the war's first confirmed American deaths on Jordanian soil.
CENTCOM
CENTCOM
CENTCOM confirmed a third American service member died in northern Iraq on 19 July clearing unexploded ordnance from a downed Iranian drone, and recovered unidentified remains at Muwaffaq Salti Air Base in Jordan. The Pentagon has framed its Khuzestan strikes as degrading IRGC capacity, a rationale that stretches to explain a reactor foundation with no nuclear material in it.
Kuwait
Kuwait
Kuwait's military said it was confronting Iranian attacks after the Shuaiba power and desalination complex burned for the second time in two days on 19 July, following an earlier ministry request that households ration water. Roughly 90 per cent of Kuwait's drinking water depends on the same generating units Iran keeps hitting.
IRGC
IRGC
The IRGC claimed a 21st wave of Operation Nasr-2 struck Aqaba Airport and Azraq on 20 July, destroying hangars and aircraft, and thanked Jordanians for supplying intelligence. No US, Jordanian or Kuwaiti source has confirmed any part of the claim, which Press TV alone carried.
IAEA
IAEA
The IAEA said it is looking into reports of a 19 July strike on the Darkhovin nuclear plant construction site, confirming inspectors found no nuclear material there on their last visit. Grossi again called for restraint near nuclear sites, a faster response than the four months of silence that followed the disputed Bushehr strike.
Shipping and war-risk insurers
Shipping and war-risk insurers
War-risk premiums for Hormuz transits reached 3 to 10 per cent of hull value on 17 July, against 0.25 per cent before the war, as Brent cleared $87 and daily transits fell to eight vessels. Underwriters are pricing the confirmed UKMTO mine near the Traffic Separation Scheme, not the IRGC's unconfirmed 18 July mining claim, which CENTCOM called false.