Skip to content
You can now search across every topic, entity and event.What's new
Iran Conflict 2026
23JUN

Navy buys seven years of Tomahawks

2 min read
11:42UTC

The US Navy signed a $22.9 billion contract with Raytheon on 17 August, lifting Tomahawk production from about 60 missiles a year to more than a thousand. It is the first hard number anyone has put on sustaining this war.

ConflictDeveloping
Key takeaway

The contract's seven-year term, not its value, is what states Washington's expectation about this war.

The US Navy signed a $22.9 billion, seven-year contract with Raytheon on Monday 17 August to lift Tomahawk production from about 60 missiles a year to more than a thousand 12. A Tomahawk is a long-range cruise missile launched from ships and submarines against targets hundreds of miles inland. US Central Command (CENTCOM), the American military command responsible for the Middle East, had fired 850 of them by 1 April, the most in any single American operation on record .

Do the sum. At 60 missiles a year, replacing those 850 alone takes 14 years. At more than a thousand a year, it takes about ten months. The award runs to 2033 and sits inside the Department of War's Arsenal of Freedom initiative, the department's programme for expanding munitions production, which means the Navy has priced this war past two presidential budget cycles 34.

Nobody had put a price on sustaining this war until the Navy signed one. A contract carries a value, a term and a rate, which a statement does not, and this one buys the capacity to keep firing at the pace of the past six months for the rest of the decade. Congress now has a recurring line item to attach conditions to, which is a lever the war powers votes have not produced.

Acting Secretary of the Navy Hung Cao wrote on X that industry had been asked to scale munitions output rapidly and that RTX was delivering 5. That is a social media post rather than a department release, and it is the only comment from a named official in either account of the award. Raytheon also dates the decision earlier than the war's heaviest month of firing: the company says it delivered three times more Tomahawks in the first half of 2026 than in the first half of 2025, and the 17 August award firms up a framework agreement signed with the military back in February 67. A build-out planned before the worst of this year's firing rate is a different thing from an emergency backfill.

Deep Analysis

In plain English

A Tomahawk is a long-range cruise missile the US Navy fires from ships and submarines at targets hundreds of miles away. The Navy has been firing them faster than factories could replace them. This $22.9 billion deal pays Raytheon, the manufacturer, to build far more of them each year, for the next seven years, so the stockpile does not run out.

Deep Analysis
Root Causes

Tomahawk production runs through a single Raytheon line in Tucson, Arizona, built around specialised components, including turbofan engines sourced from Williams International, that cannot be doubled by adding shifts alone.

The Department of War's Arsenal of Freedom initiative exists because the Pentagon's peacetime procurement cycle assumed replenishment over years rather than months; committing to 2033 locks in supplier investment the department could not otherwise guarantee year to year, the same industrial constraint already visible in the JASSM-ER cruise missile programme .

What could happen next?
  • Consequence

    Locking Tomahawk output through 2033 commits US defence budgets to sustaining this war's munitions pace well past any near-term ceasefire.

First Reported In

Update #174 · A $22.9bn missile order, and a hunger row

RTX· 23 Aug 2026
Read original
Causes and effects
This Event
Navy buys seven years of Tomahawks
A signed seven-year contract states an expectation about the war's length that no statement from either capital has.
Different Perspectives
Shipping and insurance industry
Shipping and insurance industry
UKMTO counted about 20 US-facilitated Hormuz transits a day to 11 September against only 6 visible on AIS, with traffic still around 90% below the 138-a-day pre-war baseline. War-risk underwriters cannot price hulls they cannot see, or resolve whether the tanker El Gaia hit a mine, as Iran claims, or a missile and drone, as CENTCOM says.
European refiners
European refiners
European refiners, including Poland's Orlen, absorbed a roughly $26 gap between Dated Brent at $130.80 on 15 September and ICE Brent futures settling at $103.87 on 18 September, a spread that widened from $13.45 on 9 September rather than newly opening. Their futures hedges no longer cover what they now pay for physical barrels.
Saudi Arabia
Saudi Arabia
Saudi Aramco zeroed European term customers' October allocations and rerouted roughly 60 million barrels to Asia through Ras Tanura and Sohar, using Red Sea and Gulf terminal capacity built years ago to cut Hormuz exposure. Riyadh reallocated existing supply rather than negotiating a shortfall with Europe.
Qatar
Qatar
Qatar's energy minister Saad al-Kaabi told Bloomberg at the Qatar Economic Forum on 20 September that Bessent's two-year Hormuz-obsolescence forecast is wrong, and that Doha has deliberately built no bypass pipeline. Qatar's gas exports run through one waterway by choice, not oversight.
Iran (foreign ministry and Majlis)
Iran (foreign ministry and Majlis)
Iran's foreign ministry and 130 Majlis deputies moved toward NPT withdrawal this week, with lawmaker Hossein-Ali Haji Deligani filing a triple-urgency bill on 20 September that Speaker Qalibaf has not yet scheduled. Tehran treats treaty membership as leverage still on the table, not yet spent.
Russia and China
Russia and China
Moscow and Beijing vetoed the Panel of Experts' renewal, maintaining Resolution 2231 lapsed in October 2025 and the 2025 snapback was never validly triggered, so the sanctions architecture the Panel enforces has no current legal standing. Both governments frame the veto as upholding law, not shielding Tehran.